Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t agree with this, sorry. A planned C section is not the same as an emergency one. Trying to make all forms of birth equal and argue we need better postpartum care doesn’t pass mustard. A planned C section should be a perfectly legitimate choice that is supported and it can be protective of the pelvic floor. Certainly, it comes with other risks so everyone has to choose for themselves. But to act like the pelvic floor is a big mystery means you don’t understand urogynecology. They understand it pretty damn well - and that vaginal and instrumental births are highly associated with PFDs - they just do not have good surgical treatment options right now that don’t fail or cause other problems and good options likely many years away. And yes, pelvic PT is great, but there are plenty of women who aren’t “cured” by it and have to learn to live with really crappy conditions.
My daughter will know that she has a family history of pelvic floor disorders. She will understand the difficulties her grandmother, great grandmother, and mother faced and she will get to choose for herself her mode of delivery and associated risks with full information.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180717-the-pelvic-floor-is-still-a-mystery-in-anatomy - written in 2018 and has direct quotes from urogynecologists at highly regarding teaching hospitals.
If its something anatomically dysfunctional with your specific family then that is different. You cant take your family history and extrapolate out to all planned csections. Also pregnancy itself damages the pelvic floor so maybe just no pregnancy? Csections are supported by and large by being a choice for all women, vaginal births arent getting enough support nor is there enough understanding about how EACH women is different and should be evaluated prior to pregnancy and childbirth.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t agree with this, sorry. A planned C section is not the same as an emergency one. Trying to make all forms of birth equal and argue we need better postpartum care doesn’t pass mustard. A planned C section should be a perfectly legitimate choice that is supported and it can be protective of the pelvic floor. Certainly, it comes with other risks so everyone has to choose for themselves. But to act like the pelvic floor is a big mystery means you don’t understand urogynecology. They understand it pretty damn well - and that vaginal and instrumental births are highly associated with PFDs - they just do not have good surgical treatment options right now that don’t fail or cause other problems and good options likely many years away. And yes, pelvic PT is great, but there are plenty of women who aren’t “cured” by it and have to learn to live with really crappy conditions.
My daughter will know that she has a family history of pelvic floor disorders. She will understand the difficulties her grandmother, great grandmother, and mother faced and she will get to choose for herself her mode of delivery and associated risks with full information.
Anonymous wrote:The word unnecessary indicates that something, in hindsight, was unwarranted or inappropriate. It’s impossible to ever know the outcomes for any other form of birth than the one that delivered the child so let’s not go down that rabbit hole. There are C-sections that are wanted and those that are not. I’m suggesting that women be equally informed of the risks of
Both modes of birth and be allowed to make their own choice. Rather than vaginal birth being the default when it comes
with plenty of life-altering downsides for many women. It is pretty much the default now that you don’t find out about these risks until after you give birth and then have to life with the life-long repercussions if you are one of the unlucky ones.
My own vaginal birth was the worst experience of my entire life. It was not anecdotal. It was the day I became injured so badly that I am no longer able to run or jump without discomfort, sneeze without leaking, wear tampons, have enjoyable and pleasurable sex, wear tampons or cups, and empty my rectum normally. And far too many women like me after vaginal birth have similar injuries. - levator ani injury, nerve injury, fascial tears, vaginal/vulvar injuries, anal and or urinary incontinence, painful sex, prolapse, etc.
If you look at surgical rates among older women for prolapse and incontinence, you will see there is a vast ocean of women who bear the brunt of these injuries silently and suffer. I’m not promoting C-sections, I’m promoting informed consent for women so they can make the right choice for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Also, buy stool softener in advance for your recovery
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I just got emailed instructions from the hospital.
On the topics of medicine it says: "You will receive Tylenol (acetaminophen) every 6 hours throughout your hospital stay. For the first 24 hours you will receive Toradol (ketorolac) through your IV every 6 hours. This is similar to ibuprofen. After the first 24 hours you will receive Motrin (ibuprofen) by mouth every 6 hours. If you continue to have pain, you can ask your nurse for a stronger pain medication (oxycodone)."
I understand the constipation issue and also that medical professionals are trying to keep ppl off addictive pain meds. Does what they describe seem like the right balance? Seems like the only options are mild over the counter or oxycodone. There is nothing in the middle?
Toradol is money. That’s some good stuff. I had no problems getting oxycodone when I asked. Be confident in your own voice. Some doctors and hospitals will make you feel like an addict. You are not. You are a woman who just has her stomach cut open and don’t let them convince you you don’t know your own pain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is such an awesome thread, thank you so much PPs! NP here. Knowing what you know and reading this thread, if you had a choice between an elective C section (for context, DH was born without GD at 12.5 lbs and 24 inches and) would you just...elect for this from the get go? Seems like the ideal is:
1) Vaginal Birth- no issues, no tearing
2) Planned C section
3) Vaginal birth, vaginal trauma
4) Emergency C with hours and hours of pushing and trauma
Is a scheduled c for a first birth nuts? It sounds a heck of a lot better than some of these horrible pelvic floor tearing options.
As someone with major pelvic floor injuries after a low risk pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery, I will 100 percent recommend to my daughter that she have scheduled c sections for her births. The incidence of prolapse, incontinence, pain, etc. after vaginal birth is quite high - let alone anatomical changes to nerve function and vaginal shape/size that really can damage sexual function - is extremely high. Wanting and needing to be able to poop, pee, have sex, exercise, wear tampons/manage periods easily, and orgasm normally for the rest of your life after childbirth really matters and right now no one takes that into account when considering Risks of vaginal delivery.
Birth.
Did you have an induction? Did you have a epidural? What position did you give birth?
I find hers facts immaterial to the conversation. What are you trying to suggest, anyway?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is such an awesome thread, thank you so much PPs! NP here. Knowing what you know and reading this thread, if you had a choice between an elective C section (for context, DH was born without GD at 12.5 lbs and 24 inches and) would you just...elect for this from the get go? Seems like the ideal is:
1) Vaginal Birth- no issues, no tearing
2) Planned C section
3) Vaginal birth, vaginal trauma
4) Emergency C with hours and hours of pushing and trauma
Is a scheduled c for a first birth nuts? It sounds a heck of a lot better than some of these horrible pelvic floor tearing options.
As someone with major pelvic floor injuries after a low risk pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery, I will 100 percent recommend to my daughter that she have scheduled c sections for her births. The incidence of prolapse, incontinence, pain, etc. after vaginal birth is quite high - let alone anatomical changes to nerve function and vaginal shape/size that really can damage sexual function - is extremely high. Wanting and needing to be able to poop, pee, have sex, exercise, wear tampons/manage periods easily, and orgasm normally for the rest of your life after childbirth really matters and right now no one takes that into account when considering Risks of vaginal delivery.
Birth.
Did you have an induction? Did you have a epidural? What position did you give birth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is such an awesome thread, thank you so much PPs! NP here. Knowing what you know and reading this thread, if you had a choice between an elective C section (for context, DH was born without GD at 12.5 lbs and 24 inches and) would you just...elect for this from the get go? Seems like the ideal is:
1) Vaginal Birth- no issues, no tearing
2) Planned C section
3) Vaginal birth, vaginal trauma
4) Emergency C with hours and hours of pushing and trauma
Is a scheduled c for a first birth nuts? It sounds a heck of a lot better than some of these horrible pelvic floor tearing options.
As someone with major pelvic floor injuries after a low risk pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery, I will 100 percent recommend to my daughter that she have scheduled c sections for her births. The incidence of prolapse, incontinence, pain, etc. after vaginal birth is quite high - let alone anatomical changes to nerve function and vaginal shape/size that really can damage sexual function - is extremely high. Wanting and needing to be able to poop, pee, have sex, exercise, wear tampons/manage periods easily, and orgasm normally for the rest of your life after childbirth really matters and right now no one takes that into account when considering Risks of vaginal delivery.
Birth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is such an awesome thread, thank you so much PPs! NP here. Knowing what you know and reading this thread, if you had a choice between an elective C section (for context, DH was born without GD at 12.5 lbs and 24 inches and) would you just...elect for this from the get go? Seems like the ideal is:
1) Vaginal Birth- no issues, no tearing
2) Planned C section
3) Vaginal birth, vaginal trauma
4) Emergency C with hours and hours of pushing and trauma
Is a scheduled c for a first birth nuts? It sounds a heck of a lot better than some of these horrible pelvic floor tearing options.
Most women only get minor tearing and they usually heal just fine. There are risk factors for severe tearing but large baby isn't the biggest. Having a prolonged labor, an induction, a first birth to an AMA mom, an episiotomy, or an operative birth (vacuum, forceps) are much bigger risk factors for severe tears.
I don't think the categories you listed are that clean in reality. The majority of women have tearing with no trauma. I had a tear and I have a pelvic pain disorder so I thought it would be debilitating, but it healed quickly and I never had any issues. More women have severe hemorrhages and emergency hysterectomies from planned c-sections than they do from vaginal birth. Plus, labor and vaginal birth carry benefits for the baby and typically reduce your recovery time. However, c-sections are somewhat more protective of your pelvic floor - prolapse and incontinence issues (although studies show as women age the rates of incontinence are about equal between the two modes of delivery).
There are things you can do to reduce your risks of tearing. Waiting to go into labor on your own, laboring at home until active labor, moving around throughout labor, delaying pushing for up to an hour after transition, and pushing in an upright position are all things that raise your chances of giving birth without trauma.