Anonymous wrote:This seems relevant. Grenell was working on behalf of Moldova and of course didn’t disclose this or file as a foreign agent with DOJ.
Trump’s New Spy Chief Used to Work for a Foreign Politician the U.S. Accused of Corruption
https://www.propublica.org/article/trumps-new-spy-chief-used-to-work-for-a-foreign-politician-the-us-accused-of-corruption/amp?__twitter_impression=true
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You may not agree with the presidents decision but it is within his discretion to change the appointment of an acting official. Nothing illegal.
The "it's not illegal" crowd is getting so tiresome.
Guess what, segregation wasn't illegal for decades, either. But it was always unethical and something that anyone righteous and with a moral compass and sense of decency would condemn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DNI is far from a ceremonial position. I don’t even know where some of you get this crap from.
I’m guessing most Americans didn’t even know this position exists, so it’s hard to get worked up about something they know nothing about.
It was pretty common knowledge that after 9/11, Congressional oversight demonstrated a lack of coordination among the different agencies. The oDNI and DNI positions were created to fill the gap. I am sorry if people don't remember or know this, but that doesn't make it something to be blase about.
Anonymous wrote:You may not agree with the presidents decision but it is within his discretion to change the appointment of an acting official. Nothing illegal.
Anonymous wrote:You may not agree with the presidents decision but it is within his discretion to change the appointment of an acting official. Nothing illegal.
Anonymous wrote:You may not agree with the presidents decision but it is within his discretion to change the appointment of an acting official. Nothing illegal.
Anonymous wrote:You may not agree with the presidents decision but it is within his discretion to change the appointment of an acting official. Nothing illegal.