Anonymous wrote:He goes to work to earn money and that is his job. You stay home and take care if all household/ child duties and this is your job. You probably have a cleaning person as well as a nanny or au pair so why should the person earning the money help you with anything?
Anonymous wrote:He goes to work to earn money and that is his job. You stay home and take care if all household/ child duties and this is your job. You probably have a cleaning person as well as a nanny or au pair so why should the person earning the money help you with anything?
Anonymous wrote:He goes to work to earn money and that is his job. You stay home and take care if all household/ child duties and this is your job. You probably have a cleaning person as well as a nanny or au pair so why should the person earning the money help you with anything?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is childcare work when someone is paid to do it but not work when a parent does it?
Because in one case it’s parenting/living life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, PP? Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Ask the IRS whose money it is.
All of our accounts are joint accounts so I don't understand your point.
I’m sure you dont.
LOL. Please explain it then.
While you’re at it you can also explain why you are so threatened by highly-educated women in modern relationships.
What are you talking about? Modern how?
AKA “progressive and egalitarian” - terms previously used on this thread. Not “retro”.
It’s progressive to cook and clean for a man who has no relationship with his own children? And then get screwed in a divorce? Sounds awesome!
LOL. I guess you missed the whole conversation. No, that is a "retro" relationship.
Please explain the modern relationship where your husband earns the money that supports you.
Anonymous wrote:Why is childcare work when someone is paid to do it but not work when a parent does it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, PP? Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Ask the IRS whose money it is.
All of our accounts are joint accounts so I don't understand your point.
I’m sure you dont.
LOL. Please explain it then.
While you’re at it you can also explain why you are so threatened by highly-educated women in modern relationships.
What are you talking about? Modern how?
AKA “progressive and egalitarian” - terms previously used on this thread. Not “retro”.
It’s progressive to cook and clean for a man who has no relationship with his own children? And then get screwed in a divorce? Sounds awesome!
LOL. I guess you missed the whole conversation. No, that is a "retro" relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, PP? Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Ask the IRS whose money it is.
All of our accounts are joint accounts so I don't understand your point.
I’m sure you dont.
LOL. Please explain it then.
While you’re at it you can also explain why you are so threatened by highly-educated women in modern relationships.
What are you talking about? Modern how?
AKA “progressive and egalitarian” - terms previously used on this thread. Not “retro”.
It’s progressive to cook and clean for a man who has no relationship with his own children? And then get screwed in a divorce? Sounds awesome!
Anonymous wrote:Labor should be divided equally.
So, if SAHM is working (child care, housework, etc) the entire time DH is at work, then they split up the remaining tasks equally at home.
If SAHM is going to the gym and coffee with friends while the kids are at school, that does not count as work time and SAHM should take on more in the evenings and on weekends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, PP? Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Ask the IRS whose money it is.
All of our accounts are joint accounts so I don't understand your point.
I’m sure you dont.
LOL. Please explain it then.
While you’re at it you can also explain why you are so threatened by highly-educated women in modern relationships.
What are you talking about? Modern how?
AKA “progressive and egalitarian” - terms previously used on this thread. Not “retro”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being a SAHM means you’re going to be doing the bulk of childcare, cleaning and cooking. The exception is if you’re wealthy and can outsource all of this. I mean insanely wealthy with live in staff. Weekly cleaners still mean there is cleaning work for the SAHM like cleaning after meals and kids playing.
Most women aren’t interested in being a man’s maid, cook and nanny so they go to work. It’s a better arrangement. You get paid money too.
If you’re a SAHM and you expect your husband to pitch in at home a lot well then you’re not doing your job. He will think you’re a joke. You don’t work and you STILL can’t manage everything at home??
You need to meet better men.
C’mon. What are you even doing if you stay at home and don’t handle most stuff at home? A woman stays home to spend more time with kids, not pay for childcare, not burden the higher earning spouse with chores, etc. It is terrible to admit but a woman stays home to benefit everyone else.
You’re insane if you think your husband should be the sole breadwinner and then come home and split chores with you.
Huh? That is exactly what we do in our family. I only stayed home to be with my kids. Chores are unrelated to job/school status in our family. Everyone helps.
+1
We outsourced chores. We did not outsource childcare. I am a highly educated ( double masters) sahm with tons of certification. My kids benefit by having me as their support, tutor and advisor at home. Chores are low value stuff. Taking care of the kids and guiding them is high value stuff. I am the planner and organizer in the family.
Kids are thriving with no behaviour problems. They are high achievers at school. House is running well because I can manage the people who are responsible for the chores. DH is doing well and out marriage is strong because there is very few stressors.
I have no desire to spend any of my time working for some one else..I am willing to give all my talents and education to my kids. Maybe when they leave for college, I'll go and get a job. For now, I am valuable at home and I want to give my time, love and education to my kids.
Sounds like you’re entire life is your kids. Not all women want this type of life. I enjoy working and having my own identity and interests. Your entire post reads kids kids kids. It’s boring. My own mom was this way and she did herself a disservice.