Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are working on Local Level IV at all schools. Fox Mill starts one next year and the communications that we received on the topic said that every ES would have LLIV in 3 years. That is great but I think that the full time AART at each school would be more beneficial.
I suspect that there are more kids that are advanced in Math or in LA then are advanced in both. A full time AART that could push in to classrooms once a week and work with the Level III kids for LA as well as the Level III pull out would be amazing. Advanced Math starting in third grade across all schools would meet the need for the advanced math kids. Then LLIV becomes the place for kids who are strong in both areas. Gen Ed Teachers get good support so that they can work more with the struggling kids and the kids who are on grade level.
LLIV at all ES would have how many classes for LLIV and LLIII
LIII is a pull out, not a class. A school Fox Mill’s size will have 1 LLIV class, there are 90 kids in third this year, 2 Japanese Immersion classes and 2 Gen Ed classes. I am guessing LLIV will be about 10 kids selected for AAP and 10 Principal Placed kids, with the Principal Placed mainly from Gen Ed. But that is a guess. JI AAP kids will continue with Advanced Math in Japanese and probably join LLIV for LA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are working on Local Level IV at all schools. Fox Mill starts one next year and the communications that we received on the topic said that every ES would have LLIV in 3 years. That is great but I think that the full time AART at each school would be more beneficial.
I suspect that there are more kids that are advanced in Math or in LA then are advanced in both. A full time AART that could push in to classrooms once a week and work with the Level III kids for LA as well as the Level III pull out would be amazing. Advanced Math starting in third grade across all schools would meet the need for the advanced math kids. Then LLIV becomes the place for kids who are strong in both areas. Gen Ed Teachers get good support so that they can work more with the struggling kids and the kids who are on grade level.
LLIV at all ES would have how many classes for LLIV and LLIII
Anonymous wrote:They are working on Local Level IV at all schools. Fox Mill starts one next year and the communications that we received on the topic said that every ES would have LLIV in 3 years. That is great but I think that the full time AART at each school would be more beneficial.
I suspect that there are more kids that are advanced in Math or in LA then are advanced in both. A full time AART that could push in to classrooms once a week and work with the Level III kids for LA as well as the Level III pull out would be amazing. Advanced Math starting in third grade across all schools would meet the need for the advanced math kids. Then LLIV becomes the place for kids who are strong in both areas. Gen Ed Teachers get good support so that they can work more with the struggling kids and the kids who are on grade level.
Anonymous wrote:I wish every school had at least one full time AART. Then there would be more time to allow the AART to push in or pull out to work with the Level III classes for each grade and maybe even a more robust Level II program. Something like the reading specialists that they have at the schools but for the advanced kids. That would allow the Teacher to work more with the struggling and grade level kid while giving the advanced kids some additional attention.
I think our AART is spread between 2 schools, maybe 3. Those hours are split so that there is less time for the kids at each school. If each school had a full time AART then there would be more hours, stronger Level III, and less pressure for Level IV services because kids who do fine but not necessarily thrive in Level IV would be able to have their needs met.
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised no one had sued FCPS about how unequal AAP is across the system. For a system worried about equity...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would strengthen level III though. Bright gen ed and middle of the pack & below in level IV are pretty much the same. But kids who don’t get in don’t get to be challenged. It’s completely unfair.
+1
DP and also agree. It's not delivered equally across schools at all. If we've learned anything this year, it's that certain decisions should not be left up to individual principals because they'll do the absolute bare minimum until/unless they're pushed.
Also strengthening Level III would alleviate some of the push for Level IV. My base ES is a great example - no advanced math until 5th, part time AART, Level III is an hour once a week (at best as it is often the thing dropped for testing, assemblies, etc.). The difference between that and Level IV is massive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would strengthen level III though. Bright gen ed and middle of the pack & below in level IV are pretty much the same. But kids who don’t get in don’t get to be challenged. It’s completely unfair.
+1
DP and also agree. It's not delivered equally across schools at all. If we've learned anything this year, it's that certain decisions should not be left up to individual principals because they'll do the absolute bare minimum until/unless they're pushed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would strengthen level III though. Bright gen ed and middle of the pack & below in level IV are pretty much the same. But kids who don’t get in don’t get to be challenged. It’s completely unfair.
+1
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would strengthen level III though. Bright gen ed and middle of the pack & below in level IV are pretty much the same. But kids who don’t get in don’t get to be challenged. It’s completely unfair.