Anonymous wrote:Elizabeth Warren wants 2% of that $220,000.
Vote - November 2020.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your children pay for grad school. Without that financial incentive, they will make poor decisions.
Do you have any idea how expensive grad school has become? Duke Law is $103K per year. No way my kid is racking up $310K in debt.
What?!? I am just getting my head around DD's college tuition.
Anonymous wrote:You figured us out we are actually part of the secret service :/. Seriously not going to give anymore personal info.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You figured us out we are actually part of the secret service :/. Seriously not going to give anymore personal info.
It does make things more intriguing. If you were career government workers you'd have to be contributing such a high percentage of your government salaries from when you first started to work that it makes you wonder how you managed to live, had a family, bought a house and paid it off and all that.
Anonymous wrote:You figured us out we are actually part of the secret service :/. Seriously not going to give anymore personal info.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we’ve gotten off topic by discussing OP’s astronomical retirement savings, but another reason it doesn’t make sense is that if the funds are truly in retirement accounts, then you’ve been limited in your contributions. Right now, a dual earning couple can contribute 40-some thousand to 401ks and IRAs. The limits were even lower earlier in OP’s career, so even with compounding, the numbers don’t seem to make sense. Does one of you have very generous employer matching? We are in our early 40s and have been maxing 2 401ks and IRAs for since our mid-20s and we are a bit north of 1.5 million in retirement accounts. For the past five years, one of us has had very generous employer matching.
The IRS max is $56,000 (when you combine individual and company match/profit-sharing). So many people think it's just $19,000 per year max.
+1 Also in this area you have people who can combine apply to a 403b/401k, a 457 (govt employees), and then add in an IRA. If you add in employer contributions, it adds up to far more than 40k a year for a household. If both people in a household are in this situation and you can afford it you can have additions of >100k year.
If you have a GS15 employee at the very top of the pay scale they could contribute $18500, the employer match would be $8500 and a Roth IRA would be $6000. That is around $33000
So OP and her husband are CIA or something similar, eh? Would explain why she's so cagey.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we’ve gotten off topic by discussing OP’s astronomical retirement savings, but another reason it doesn’t make sense is that if the funds are truly in retirement accounts, then you’ve been limited in your contributions. Right now, a dual earning couple can contribute 40-some thousand to 401ks and IRAs. The limits were even lower earlier in OP’s career, so even with compounding, the numbers don’t seem to make sense. Does one of you have very generous employer matching? We are in our early 40s and have been maxing 2 401ks and IRAs for since our mid-20s and we are a bit north of 1.5 million in retirement accounts. For the past five years, one of us has had very generous employer matching.
The IRS max is $56,000 (when you combine individual and company match/profit-sharing). So many people think it's just $19,000 per year max.
+1 Also in this area you have people who can combine apply to a 403b/401k, a 457 (govt employees), and then add in an IRA. If you add in employer contributions, it adds up to far more than 40k a year for a household. If both people in a household are in this situation and you can afford it you can have additions of >100k year.
So OP and her husband are CIA or something similar, eh? Would explain why she's so cagey.
Or they work for corporations. Not everyone in DC works for the government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would focus on undergrad and that’s all for now. Who know what your kids will decide to do, if undergrad at all. And as PPs have said, there are a lot of employers who will pay or contribute towards grad school. My DS is premed, we’re funding undergrad, but for medical school - assuming he makes it - he’s on his own.
Who are these employers contributing to grad school? What I know of it's just a token sum. I do know Wall Street firms will cover the MBA expenses of their favorites but that's about as likely as winning the lottery if you're 18 and thinking into the future.
OP said she and her husband both had grad school fully covered by tuition remissions but refused to explain more when asked about it and wouldn't even tell us their occupations because it was too personal.
Point is, no one should plan on employers paying for grad school. If you're lucky you might get a thousand or so if doing a part time masters while still working full time. The grad degrees that promise to return big bucks are the ones least likely to have employer remissions for tuition, methinks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we’ve gotten off topic by discussing OP’s astronomical retirement savings, but another reason it doesn’t make sense is that if the funds are truly in retirement accounts, then you’ve been limited in your contributions. Right now, a dual earning couple can contribute 40-some thousand to 401ks and IRAs. The limits were even lower earlier in OP’s career, so even with compounding, the numbers don’t seem to make sense. Does one of you have very generous employer matching? We are in our early 40s and have been maxing 2 401ks and IRAs for since our mid-20s and we are a bit north of 1.5 million in retirement accounts. For the past five years, one of us has had very generous employer matching.
The IRS max is $56,000 (when you combine individual and company match/profit-sharing). So many people think it's just $19,000 per year max.
+1 Also in this area you have people who can combine apply to a 403b/401k, a 457 (govt employees), and then add in an IRA. If you add in employer contributions, it adds up to far more than 40k a year for a household. If both people in a household are in this situation and you can afford it you can have additions of >100k year.
So OP and her husband are CIA or something similar, eh? Would explain why she's so cagey.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we’ve gotten off topic by discussing OP’s astronomical retirement savings, but another reason it doesn’t make sense is that if the funds are truly in retirement accounts, then you’ve been limited in your contributions. Right now, a dual earning couple can contribute 40-some thousand to 401ks and IRAs. The limits were even lower earlier in OP’s career, so even with compounding, the numbers don’t seem to make sense. Does one of you have very generous employer matching? We are in our early 40s and have been maxing 2 401ks and IRAs for since our mid-20s and we are a bit north of 1.5 million in retirement accounts. For the past five years, one of us has had very generous employer matching.
The IRS max is $56,000 (when you combine individual and company match/profit-sharing). So many people think it's just $19,000 per year max.
+1 Also in this area you have people who can combine apply to a 403b/401k, a 457 (govt employees), and then add in an IRA. If you add in employer contributions, it adds up to far more than 40k a year for a household. If both people in a household are in this situation and you can afford it you can have additions of >100k year.
Anonymous wrote:I would focus on undergrad and that’s all for now. Who know what your kids will decide to do, if undergrad at all. And as PPs have said, there are a lot of employers who will pay or contribute towards grad school. My DS is premed, we’re funding undergrad, but for medical school - assuming he makes it - he’s on his own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know we’ve gotten off topic by discussing OP’s astronomical retirement savings, but another reason it doesn’t make sense is that if the funds are truly in retirement accounts, then you’ve been limited in your contributions. Right now, a dual earning couple can contribute 40-some thousand to 401ks and IRAs. The limits were even lower earlier in OP’s career, so even with compounding, the numbers don’t seem to make sense. Does one of you have very generous employer matching? We are in our early 40s and have been maxing 2 401ks and IRAs for since our mid-20s and we are a bit north of 1.5 million in retirement accounts. For the past five years, one of us has had very generous employer matching.
The IRS max is $56,000 (when you combine individual and company match/profit-sharing). So many people think it's just $19,000 per year max.