Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. We don't make as much as OP's hubby but we had a baby nurse with our two. My parents paid.
Baby nurse is a really common maternity gift from parents.
the out of touch cluelessness of this board never ceases to impress.
Anonymous wrote:So I'm pregnant with our second child. With our first I tried to be "super mom" and did not hire anyone until a few weeks in when I finally broke down and hired a night nurse a couple nights a week. My husband put up a big fight about this but I overruled him since he wasn't getting up at night (I nursed).
Anyway, this time around, I want to hire a 24/7 baby nurse for at least 3 months since we'll have a toddler to take care of too.
My husband doesn't want to hire anyone even though we can afford it. When I point out that I'm the one who is going to be doing all the work so I don't think it is something he should be able to just veto, he says "I'll help out more this time."
But realistically I don't see that happening.
Our HHI is ~ 775k so we can afford this luxury. I'm really anxious about what it's going to be like taking care of a toddler and a baby at the same time. I think knowing that I'll have this level of support will help calm me down. H doesn't want to spend the money on it though and says that we should just "power through."
How should we resolve this?
Anonymous wrote:PP here. We don't make as much as OP's hubby but we had a baby nurse with our two. My parents paid.
Baby nurse is a really common maternity gift from parents.
Anonymous wrote:There's tons of space between 24/7 help for three months and zero help. Sure, get a 24/7 baby nurse until you're physically recovered and can get a routine going with the baby. That sounds very reasonable. From there, most agree that it's helpful to have some help during the day so you aren't alone with two kids with different needs all day, every day. I'd probably want this person to be a nanny who could take the older one to the playground while I napped or fed the baby. I had sleepy infants, so I'd play with the older one when the baby was napping.
Personally I wouldn't find a night nanny to be very helpful since I nursed (so I would still need to be awake) and had pretty good sleepers, but you could play this by ear. I found that the option for a nap when the toddler napped was enough to keep me feeling pretty good. The nanny could take the baby during that window, if the baby isn't also napping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys know that the vast majority of rich people and celebrities get baby nurses right?
They’re not SAH parents, they don’t work traditional hours, and they have to travel for extended periods for work. The ones you’re talking about...do they make less than $800k/year? Do their children have normal childhoods? Can they take their kids out in public without paparazzi taking pictures of their kids?
What does their experience have to do with OP?
Anonymous wrote:You guys know that the vast majority of rich people and celebrities get baby nurses right?
Anonymous wrote:NP. I'm really surprised by the number of people who seem stuck on the 24/7 part.
People, that's what a "baby nurse" is/does. It's a thing. Look it up.
You can hire people to do less of course but if you want someone good, you'll get a certified baby nurse.
Anonymous wrote:I nursed both kids and my husband got up maybe 3 times in the first year for each kid. I work outside the home.
If I had money to throw at things I would not want help with the kids. I would have a chef, a trainer who came to the house, I’d have hair and nails come to the house, daily or 2-3x a week cleaning. I would just hang with my kids.