Anonymous wrote:The new formula is 1/3 groom parents, 1/3 brides parents and 1/3 couple
BTW when grooms parents paid 100 percent the groom was expected to pay for home and let wife be a SAHM.
The grooms today wife expected to work, pay 1/2 everything and do 80 percent of child rearing. And actually give birth.
If anything in 2019 groom parents should pay
Anonymous wrote:2009.
100 guests. About $16,000. Church plus Potomac riverside reception at a members-only club (we got the venue via a friend so little cost to that). Lots of DIY on flowers and decor and friends who served as DJ and photographer. Biggest part of the bill was about 12K for catering.
Anonymous wrote:About 50-55k all in at the Monaco 10+ years ago
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new formula is 1/3 groom parents, 1/3 brides parents and 1/3 couple
BTW when grooms parents paid 100 percent the groom was expected to pay for home and let wife be a SAHM.
The grooms today wife expected to work, pay 1/2 everything and do 80 percent of child rearing. And actually give birth.
If anything in 2019 groom parents should pay
THIS X 1000.
Anonymous wrote:The wedding cost your future and the kids future. That is the real cost.
Anonymous wrote:You know what they say.. "the bigger the wedding, the sooner the divorce". Think back to those weddings in your family..
usually those most fancy and fanfare weddings end up in ugliest and soonest divorces. The smaller the wedding and more about the two people in love the better marriage. It is because those people right off the bet know what is the most important in life and focus on their future and not making drunk bunch of people they see once in their lives.
The big weddings are result of big egos.. bride, groom, parents.. and they will pop up all the time afterwards.. so there.. big egos don't go together well with marriage stability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:November 2016 at the Capitol View Rooftop. All told about $35k for 140 people.
That's really cheap for that many people. Where did you skimp out?