Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the man can’t even bring home a paycheck why would any sane woman take on all the family responsibilities?
Is the issue in this area the man can’t bring home a paycheck, or is the issue that the paycheck isn’t statistically way abnormal?
The issue is, that in this area - the person who can't bring in a substantial paycheck USUALLY quits the workforce to take care of the home of the kids.
Except in the 21st century its now possible that it could be the husband or the wife without a good income.
Most women who are planning to marry aren't interested in being the breadwinner with a husband who can provide nothing but childcare (and still none of the childbearing responsibility).
There's also the fact that if the woman is earning this much, I would look at the man and say - why aren't you a success? Are you lazy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think there is such a shortage of men who are "economically attractive" to women?
Opioids
Anonymous wrote:My guess is there has always been a shortage, but now women don’t need to rely on a man to survive. Easier to work than be married to a loser.
Anonymous wrote:So women want a penis and am ATM. Not much of a surpirse
Anonymous wrote:All I can say is wow.
When the tables turn it’s all about the money. Well, you gotta give the women credit - they are very clear in the terms of the transaction.
My only regret as a high earning DH is I should have been as clear with my expectations and demands.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because some women think they are deserving of a Kardashian existence -- too much reality television.
Unmarried woman here. I make much more than 100K a year, own my home, and have a degree. I'm not at all uncommon in this area.
Why should I marry a guy who makes less than me? Doesn't own a home? And can't provide me a higher standard of living than I can for myself?
Especially considering the childbearing years and work would effectively halve my own income.
I'm genuinely curious.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2019/09/09/marriage-rate-study-economically-unattractive-mxp-vpx.hln
This story discusses a Cornell study that says the reason that US marriage rates are at an all time low is because there is a shortage of economically attractive men. They are labeling economically unattractive as lacking a bachelors degree or making less than $40,000 a year. Apparently women are reluctant to "marry down" so are remaining single instead. Assuming this study is valid, why do you think there is such a shortage of men who are "economically attractive" to women?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of women overlook men working in the trades.
The men I know working in the trades are making
big money and seem to be much happier than
office workers.
They are not "socially acceptable"