Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
![]()
OP has a 3 year old. She’s already going to have a 20 year old when she’s 60. Having a second child who will be 20 when OP is 63 won’t be much different.
HAHAHAHA
What? There is very little difference between 60 and 63 unless something rather serious has happened to you during that span of 3 years.
I'm 54 with a 20 year old and I absolutely love having him around. When my youngest is 20, I'll be 57 and I'm sure I'll enjoy him just as much. Dh will turn 59 when our second is 20, I'm not seeing that being an issue at all.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, thank you all so much for your support. I have decided to keep the baby. However I had my beta retested today and it's not doubling, barely rising. So it may be out of my hands anyway... I may post something about betas... but thank you all for your advice. I just kept imaging life with a second child and a sibling for my son and it just felt like a blessing and that I could work things out. So I scheduled with an OB and things aren't looking on track yet... of course now I feel guilty for the thoughts I had.... but thank you all again for your advice-
Anonymous wrote:OP here, thank you all so much for your support. I have decided to keep the baby. However I had my beta retested today and it's not doubling, barely rising. So it may be out of my hands anyway... I may post something about betas... but thank you all for your advice. I just kept imaging life with a second child and a sibling for my son and it just felt like a blessing and that I could work things out. So I scheduled with an OB and things aren't looking on track yet... of course now I feel guilty for the thoughts I had.... but thank you all again for your advice-
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
I have 20 year old & am 64. I really don’t recommend it. Age is real unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
![]()
OP has a 3 year old. She’s already going to have a 20 year old when she’s 60. Having a second child who will be 20 when OP is 63 won’t be much different.
HAHAHAHA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
![]()
OP has a 3 year old. She’s already going to have a 20 year old when she’s 60. Having a second child who will be 20 when OP is 63 won’t be much different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, thank you all again... bf has custody of his teenage daughter, his other children are grown and independent. He sees his children and provides financially so no worries there. I don't think he's a hobosexual (which that term made me laugh, thanks!) I'm still torn, I'm thinking this is the worst timing ever and I dont' want to be a struggling single mom... but I can't help wanting a sibling for my child and adding to my family...my parents are deceased and I have no family around and being blessed with this surprise baby seems unreal right now... waiting on my dr's appt. Thank you all for your advice-
Good luck, OP. It sounds like this new baby would bring lots of challenges but also that there's a lot that really draws you towards it. I don't think there's any right answer, just looking deep inside yourself and deciding whether the challenges seem worth it to you. You sound like you have a good head on your shoulders and I'm sure you'll do fine either way. (And your boyfriend sounds like a good guy, although you're right to be cautious given how recently you've met him.) We're pulling for you!
Anonymous wrote:OP here, thank you all again... bf has custody of his teenage daughter, his other children are grown and independent. He sees his children and provides financially so no worries there. I don't think he's a hobosexual (which that term made me laugh, thanks!) I'm still torn, I'm thinking this is the worst timing ever and I dont' want to be a struggling single mom... but I can't help wanting a sibling for my child and adding to my family...my parents are deceased and I have no family around and being blessed with this surprise baby seems unreal right now... waiting on my dr's appt. Thank you all for your advice-
Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
OP has a 3 year old - it's not like she's starting over.
OP, if deep down in your soul you want this baby, keep the baby. At 43, this is probably your last chance to give your child a sibling, so I understand wanting to keep the baby in spite of the less-than-ideal circumstances. If you decide terminating is right for your little family, that's ok too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have terminated immediately. You are 43. Who needs a 20 yr old at age 63!
This makes no sense. So you have an ADULT 20 year old at 63. What if you had a 20yo ADULT at 43? Seriously, what is the difference? It's not like you're 63 with a toddler.
I had my lil one at 43, and I also have adult children. I love being a mom again. My pregnancy was smooth. I'm so glad it happened. OP, I want to encourage you-yes, you are in a tough spot, but there could be a bright side. Please don't feel pressured to do anything you do not want to.
Of course it’s different to have a 20 year old at 63. OP is going through a divorce which has probably put a dent in her savings, and she may be raising kids well into her senior years even though she currently has no means to support herself or them. She will still be supporting her kids at an age when she should be saving everything for retirement. OTOH if you’re 43 with adult children, you have years to ramp up your retirement savings, and all the time and energy to focus on your work. I think she should prioritize herself and her existing child. Even though she will get child support for both kids, it will still be expensive. She will be a financially strapped single mom, and it’s doubtful that her boyfriend of 3 months will stick around to help her out in her old age.
I'll have a 20 year old when I'm 57. I am so much more prepared to guide that 20 year old at the age of 57 than I would have been at 37. I've had 20 more years of life experience under my belt. That is a good thing!
DP. That's a good thing if you're stable, financially and emotionally, and have support all around. OP doesn't have any of that, and she's getting up there in age.
OP, I don't want to scare you, or anything, but my SIL was diagnosed with ovarian cancer at 43. She died 4 years later and left two children behind. And she was married to a trust fund dude, so, at least, monetary side of the situation wasn't that tragic (although even the trust fund dude ended up with tons of medical bills), but imagine if she was single, with no family to speak of, and two preschoolers to take care of.
Anonymous wrote:Well, the pro-abortion folks are out in full force in this thread.
Op. I hope you have a few close friends you can share this with or if not, seek out a professional source of support to talk things over with. You know yourself and your situation best. If your reaction is to "feel blessed with a surprise baby and a second child" that is also a wonderful thing.
I wish you all the best. Not all good things in life are planned. The unexpected can be amazing