Anonymous wrote:I like her. Who would be her VP? Booker or Harris? Or maybe the former Mass. Gov. Deval Patrick?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Your choice -- not mine.
And I bet most Independents are like me....when a candidate promises to abolish the private insurance held by 180 million Americans, and to offer huge new entitlements to be funded by a more than questionable wealth tax...we think thanks but no thanks.
I am the PP you are responding to - and I don't fricking want a socialist revolution either. But we're not actually getting one and anyone who says we are is either hopelessly naive or just trying to scare you out of voting for a Democrat. I think a public option is the best way to improve healthcare. I cringe every time I hear the candidates talk about abolishing private healthcare. I cringe at a lot of things that are further left than I am - things that realistically they will never actually be able to pass because we just aren't that country.
But I sure as fck am not going to be scared out of voting for a Democrat by some braindead Trump supporter shouting SOCIALISM SOCIALISM SOCIALISM while propping up the military industrial contract, promoting crony capitalism to a sickening degree, and giving billions of dollars to already-rich agricultural barons while denying pennies and a basic safety net to ordinary people.
I believe your hate for Trump is making you ignore very obvious red flags among Dem candidates but, well, crazily enough we have more than a year to go and to see who actually proposed what.
Personally I am dismayed that a great and proven Governor like Hickenlooper is about to leave the race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Your choice -- not mine.
And I bet most Independents are like me....when a candidate promises to abolish the private insurance held by 180 million Americans, and to offer huge new entitlements to be funded by a more than questionable wealth tax...we think thanks but no thanks.
I am the PP you are responding to - and I don't fricking want a socialist revolution either. But we're not actually getting one and anyone who says we are is either hopelessly naive or just trying to scare you out of voting for a Democrat. I think a public option is the best way to improve healthcare. I cringe every time I hear the candidates talk about abolishing private healthcare. I cringe at a lot of things that are further left than I am - things that realistically they will never actually be able to pass because we just aren't that country.
But I sure as fck am not going to be scared out of voting for a Democrat by some braindead Trump supporter shouting SOCIALISM SOCIALISM SOCIALISM while propping up the military industrial contract, promoting crony capitalism to a sickening degree, and giving billions of dollars to already-rich agricultural barons while denying pennies and a basic safety net to ordinary people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Your choice -- not mine.
And I bet most Independents are like me....when a candidate promises to abolish the private insurance held by 180 million Americans, and to offer huge new entitlements to be funded by a more than questionable wealth tax...we think thanks but no thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Your choice -- not mine.
And I bet most Independents are like me....when a candidate promises to abolish the private insurance held by 180 million Americans, and to offer huge new entitlements to be funded by a more than questionable wealth tax...we think thanks but no thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
yes, because Socialist revolutions have worked out SOOOO well previously, right? Or is it that true socialism hasn't been tried yet? What's your version?
Anonymous wrote:
There won’t be any America left if the GOP treasons four more years. They’re dismantling everything that makes America what it is.
Anonymous wrote:
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
that's a false dichotomy, first
but second, i'd take the socialist revolution over more trump. i'd take almost anything over more trump, frankly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Better four more years of what we have than four years of the socialist revolution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks
Then you will get four more years of Trump, and you will deserve it. We can't afford the luxury of a third party candidate this round.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:amy klobuchar would be a conservative in any other oecd country. supporting amy klobuchar means you are a closet republican who happens to like gay people.
Then put me on that list.
If Warren makes it, i'm going third party. She's way too progressive. And she thinks money will fall down from the heavens.
no thanks