Anonymous wrote:Why should you get full-time pay for working part-time after you’ve already gotten 3 months off paid? No need to be greedy. Goodness.
Anonymous wrote:Does your company not gave an STD on LTD policy? Cant you tweak those policies to be a but generalized so birth, recovery, postpartum is included?
Pretty much FMLA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing. I would add in that people need to stay for 2 years after returning to work or they have to give back the money. Similar to tuition benefits.
Agree with this. I know a lot of people who have taken their paid maternity leave and then bailed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is an employee has a baby every year? This happens more frequently than you think.
But is it going to happen two to three years in a row? Or is it happening 4-6 years in a row. Realistically, I figure a working woman who has a baby a year for 2-3 years has spent at least a decade focusing on her career and is highly qualified, but has a short window to have babies. I doubt anyone is working FT with 5 under 5.
Anonymous wrote:What is an employee has a baby every year? This happens more frequently than you think.
Anonymous wrote:Amazing. I would add in that people need to stay for 2 years after returning to work or they have to give back the money. Similar to tuition benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:* Gender-neutral paid leave for new parents of new children (includes biological, adopted and foster)
* Six months total: 3 months fully paid, 3 months of partially paid leave or return to work for 3 months part-time with full-time pay
* Same for medical leave
* 1 month caregiving leave
We’re a small org (less than 50 people), but they’re very serious about diversifying their staff and especially leadership and I told them
this is how you do it.
I wonder if you’re going to get the result you want. I think there’s a segment of the workforce that will like this but I don’t see it as universal by any means and I think a lot of people are going to resent it. I also think it’s going to be tough for a small organization to actually provide this.
Hey look, OP - an added benefit to your policy! You can easily identify those that are going to be crappy, resentful co-workers and not hire them in the first place. Win-win!
No. Best not to hire women under age 50.
I'm sure a lot of misogynistic morons would love that, but it turns out that we are highly qualified, educated, smart and work our asses off. Kind of gets in the way.
You forgot entitled and you do not work off anything except your mouths.