Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:but more than a 100 will experience phimosis and need to be circumcised, bet those more than a 100 parents really wish they circumcised in infancy. Actually, it’s about 0.6% of all uncircumcised males that will require surgery in later life.
Phimosis hardly compares to a risk of death or genital loss.
Risk of death from bleeding only happens in babies with underlying blood clotting conditions.How many cases of genital loss have you heard of in this century in the US?
The risk of infant death from circumcision is about the same as from SIDS. We do all sorts of inconvenient things to prevent SIDS death. But yet so many choose voluntary surgery on their child’s genitals for minor/questionable health benefits while downplaying the risks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:but more than a 100 will experience phimosis and need to be circumcised, bet those more than a 100 parents really wish they circumcised in infancy. Actually, it’s about 0.6% of all uncircumcised males that will require surgery in later life.
Phimosis hardly compares to a risk of death or genital loss.
Risk of death from bleeding only happens in babies with underlying blood clotting conditions.How many cases of genital loss have you heard of in this century in the US?
Anonymous wrote:but more than a 100 will experience phimosis and need to be circumcised, bet those more than a 100 parents really wish they circumcised in infancy. Actually, it’s about 0.6% of all uncircumcised males that will require surgery in later life.
Phimosis hardly compares to a risk of death or genital loss.
Anonymous wrote:I really don't get this "reduce infections/stds" thing. The easiest way to avoid getting an STD is to not have sex with people that have STDs. Teach your sons to respect themselves (and their future partners) enough to be selective in who they have sex with.
We don't do this with other medical issues! "oh there's a chance my child might have an eye injury one day, so we're just going to go ahead and have her eyes gouged out at birth."
"We're very concerned about cavities and dental health, so we'll remove all his teeth now as a newborn."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My now-adult sons are uncircumsized, like my dh.
It was actually never a topic of anything during childhood. Like, never. I'm glad I didn't do it.
Science ignorance is bliss
Anonymous wrote:Two boys ages 13 and 11, both circ’d. I’m a former RN and worked with a lot of HIV patients. It doesn’t matter if HIV is prevalent in the region, it matters if it’s prevalent in the person one has second with. I believed in the science - health related benefits of reducing likelihood of disease transmission - and I also recall working with pediatric patients who had multi-day hospital stays for circumcision at an older (pre-teen/early teen age).
The “uncut” son of anti-circ parents we know was recently circumcised at age 11. He was out of school for about a week and out of sports for something like 2-3 weeks while he recovered. It was apparently a very unpleasant (and humiliating) experience for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a white people thing to not circumcise. It’s the new in thing, like Keto
Only Muslims and Jews circumcise, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence.
Circumcision has also shown to greatly reduce transmission of HPV and herpes. However, it has not been shown to have an effect on syphilis so there's that, but syphilis is curable. HPV and herpes are not.
It may also reduce the rate of (rare) penile cancer and possibly cervical cancer in women.
We circumcised our son. We also have our kids the hpv vaccines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence.
Circumcision has also shown to greatly reduce transmission of HPV and herpes. However, it has not been shown to have an effect on syphilis so there's that, but syphilis is curable. HPV and herpes are not.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a white people thing to not circumcise. It’s the new in thing, like Keto
Anonymous wrote: My now-adult sons are uncircumsized, like my dh.
It was actually never a topic of anything during childhood. Like, never. I'm glad I didn't do it.