Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read this thread from a different perspective than many who are talking about tbe impact of ostracizing a girl who vaped weed.
I was in an abusive relationship and a relationship where alcoholism was an issue, which has made me sensitive to the need to draw boundaries to protect ourselves and the ways in which social pressures to be nice, non-judgmental and inclusive pressure us to continue to expose ourselves to unhealthy people or feel responsible for mitigating others bad choices.
The girl who vaped weed and charged for it did something illegal and promoted unhealthy behavior among her peers. There are consequences for that. Everyone gets to decide on their own how they feel about it personally, but for me, I get to decide what kind of home environment I want and people whom I know to do drugs are not welcome in that environment. The DD’s (and everyone’s) worry about what is the vape girl going to do at the party is so reminiscent of how families get wrapped up in what is the alcoholic going to do.
For me, I would use this to teach healthy boundaries. I’d say I know that the girl did something wrong and that she’s young, so i don’t view her as a bad person, but that I also don’t feel comfortable having someone in my home who is a known drug user. My boundary would be that DD could still have a relationship/contact with the girl in ways that were not in my home and not private and always supervised by adults. Her behavior has resulted in a loss of trust that is a necessity for access to independent activities and privacy and being welcomed into people’s homes. It takes time to earn that back through exhibiting changed behavior.
I get that you are sensitive to unhealthy dynamics given your history. I am, too. I grew up in a horrifically violent, abusive, alcoholic family and not all my siblings survived it. If I knew about your history, I'd struggle to have you in my home. It would just bring back too many memories and I'd worry you would lapse back into learned behaviors and drag me into them. I find it triggering to be around people like you. So, I guess I do understand why you would want vape girl disinvited. I guess when you've got a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
That's fine. I don't feel that everyone is obligated to socialize with me or my family. If my not drinking or using drugs and being able to draw boundaries with my polite words to protect myself is too much for you, then we are not a good fit for private socializing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read this thread from a different perspective than many who are talking about tbe impact of ostracizing a girl who vaped weed.
I was in an abusive relationship and a relationship where alcoholism was an issue, which has made me sensitive to the need to draw boundaries to protect ourselves and the ways in which social pressures to be nice, non-judgmental and inclusive pressure us to continue to expose ourselves to unhealthy people or feel responsible for mitigating others bad choices.
The girl who vaped weed and charged for it did something illegal and promoted unhealthy behavior among her peers. There are consequences for that. Everyone gets to decide on their own how they feel about it personally, but for me, I get to decide what kind of home environment I want and people whom I know to do drugs are not welcome in that environment. The DD’s (and everyone’s) worry about what is the vape girl going to do at the party is so reminiscent of how families get wrapped up in what is the alcoholic going to do.
For me, I would use this to teach healthy boundaries. I’d say I know that the girl did something wrong and that she’s young, so i don’t view her as a bad person, but that I also don’t feel comfortable having someone in my home who is a known drug user. My boundary would be that DD could still have a relationship/contact with the girl in ways that were not in my home and not private and always supervised by adults. Her behavior has resulted in a loss of trust that is a necessity for access to independent activities and privacy and being welcomed into people’s homes. It takes time to earn that back through exhibiting changed behavior.
I get that you are sensitive to unhealthy dynamics given your history. I am, too. I grew up in a horrifically violent, abusive, alcoholic family and not all my siblings survived it. If I knew about your history, I'd struggle to have you in my home. It would just bring back too many memories and I'd worry you would lapse back into learned behaviors and drag me into them. I find it triggering to be around people like you. So, I guess I do understand why you would want vape girl disinvited. I guess when you've got a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do people really feel suspension is too harsh a consequence for posing and using drugs at school?
A day or two? Sure. Expelling is too far, IMO.
But I also think the school should assign her a 5-7 page research paper on the dangers of vaping and what it does to a still-developing brain to be done during her suspension.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD’s party is in 2 weeks. We always chaperone, but this incident shows that a teen can hand a vape pen to another child at the bathroom door.
I can’t see anyone trying to vett our guest list, but there was a group text yesterday about who was going to the movies. Several moms wanted to make sure the big group didn’t include the suspended girl. It didn’t. However, she is not grounded according to DD.
Is that really the only punishment you think is valid for this offense? Maybe they are doing something else?
Their something else is a research paper about vaping.
I see that they are struggling with the realities of parenting a young teen. There’s a disconnect. One parent is rather daydreamy in an absent minded professor way. The other is very involved on a narrow aspect of child development and otherwise just focused on work and adult socializing. The girl is treated as a fourth adult in the household —there’s another relative in the home, but also never there.
A lot of additional independently verified info emerged today and the situation is more serious than just experimenting. Her attendance at a party in my home is no longer in question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD’s friend had weed in vape. That is not disputed. She may have charged other kids money to take hits off the vape. She was suspended for the rest of the school year and could be expelled. We’re shocked because the teen and family didn’t seem like the type, but there’s a lot of money and little supervision. DD has a party planned this summer. Should we tell DD to disinvite the friend? This is not a best friend.
Curious - what is “the type” of family?
Anonymous wrote:DD’s friend had weed in vape. That is not disputed. She may have charged other kids money to take hits off the vape. She was suspended for the rest of the school year and could be expelled. We’re shocked because the teen and family didn’t seem like the type, but there’s a lot of money and little supervision. DD has a party planned this summer. Should we tell DD to disinvite the friend? This is not a best friend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's great about the ostracize approach, is that when your child wears something she doesn't realize is too risque, gets a bad grade because she was sick, send a text the others didn't like, makes a poor decision and uses alcohol, etc it will be SHE who finds herself friendless or pushed into the "bad crowd." What comes around goes around and hanging out with judgemental peers is a shallow soul to grow in.
Amen. Lots of smug parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD’s party is in 2 weeks. We always chaperone, but this incident shows that a teen can hand a vape pen to another child at the bathroom door.
I can’t see anyone trying to vett our guest list, but there was a group text yesterday about who was going to the movies. Several moms wanted to make sure the big group didn’t include the suspended girl. It didn’t. However, she is not grounded according to DD.
Is that really the only punishment you think is valid for this offense? Maybe they are doing something else?
Anonymous wrote:DD’s party is in 2 weeks. We always chaperone, but this incident shows that a teen can hand a vape pen to another child at the bathroom door.
I can’t see anyone trying to vett our guest list, but there was a group text yesterday about who was going to the movies. Several moms wanted to make sure the big group didn’t include the suspended girl. It didn’t. However, she is not grounded according to DD.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that the girl will need some non-drugging friends. We’re hoping for clues from her parents about what steps they will take to get her on a better path. Right now, they are focused on the suspension. That isn’t inspiring confidence that they take it seriously.
Even if our thinking was “It’s just a little weed.”, there are other parents in the friend group who told their teens to drop the girl. Partly because the girl’s parents appear to want to fight the suspension although there’s no doubt she possessed on school grounds. If she comes to DD’s party, at least 4 other girls might not. I’m worried this will label us soft on drugs. Maybe splinter DD off into a peer group of weed smokers.