Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Her committing a crime is not what you're discussing? Isn't that all we should be discussing, in addition to the culture of entitlement and privilege that led her to believe it was okay to fraudulently gain admission for her children who did not merit it? Thinking her actions are minor in any way, or that she should somehow get a pass because "women just hate other attractive women" is an indication of a seriously flawed moral compass.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

Nope. Voted for HRC.
Such a lazy lazy response. Feeble minded really...
If you can’t see a correlation about who she is/ what she looks like and the level of vitriol, I can’t help you.

I sincerely doubt that, but points for effort. Your failure to distinguish between a white woman's outer attractiveness and her poor moral and ethical character is what's feeble. Let me guess, you think all beautiful white women (yourself included) are automatically disliked, right? Except they're not, unless they are jerks. Like Lori Loughlin.

You are correct. I am beautiful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

Nope. Voted for HRC.
Such a lazy lazy response. Feeble minded really...
If you can’t see a correlation about who she is/ what she looks like and the level of vitriol, I can’t help you.

I sincerely doubt that, but points for effort. Your failure to distinguish between a white woman's outer attractiveness and her poor moral and ethical character is what's feeble. Let me guess, you think all beautiful white women (yourself included) are automatically disliked, right? Except they're not, unless they are jerks. Like Lori Loughlin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

Nope. Voted for HRC.
Such a lazy lazy response. Feeble minded really...
If you can’t see a correlation about who she is/ what she looks like and the level of vitriol, I can’t help you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That would be soooo much better than using tax money to support her jail time.

We want to see jail time. A lot of jail time. She deserves a lot of jail time

With hard labor. Imagine her in an orange jumpsuit doing a roadside trash clean up, tarring a road or digging ditches. I'll bet she would look great doing it, too!

Honey, she’ll be paying a fine and doing the third hour of the Today show next November. I’m sure Lifetime has already called about the rights for the movie she will be producing and starring in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That would be soooo much better than using tax money to support her jail time.

We want to see jail time. A lot of jail time. She deserves a lot of jail time

With hard labor. Imagine her in an orange jumpsuit doing a roadside trash clean up, tarring a road or digging ditches. I'll bet she would look great doing it, too!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That would be soooo much better than using tax money to support her jail time.

We want to see jail time. A lot of jail time. She deserves a lot of jail time

With hard labor. Imagine her in an orange jumpsuit doing a roadside trash clean up, tarring a road or digging ditches. I'll bet she would look great doing it, too!