Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And now the Michelle Obama connection is coming to light...
a good article - https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/30/us/jussie-smollett-tina-tchen/index.html
very detailed
Weeks before a grand jury indicted Smollett on the theory he falsely reported being the victim of a hate crime, relatives of the actor, who is black and gay, had expressed to Tchen "concerns about the investigation" by Chicago police.
Getting the right person to take those sort of concerns seriously has been a hallmark of Tchen's career, highlighted by a stint as then-first lady Michelle Obama's chief of staff and now by her work leading a probe of workplace culture at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Yeah, that's the one I saw, thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And now the Michelle Obama connection is coming to light...
a good article - https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/30/us/jussie-smollett-tina-tchen/index.html
very detailed
Weeks before a grand jury indicted Smollett on the theory he falsely reported being the victim of a hate crime, relatives of the actor, who is black and gay, had expressed to Tchen "concerns about the investigation" by Chicago police.
Getting the right person to take those sort of concerns seriously has been a hallmark of Tchen's career, highlighted by a stint as then-first lady Michelle Obama's chief of staff and now by her work leading a probe of workplace culture at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
I'm sure it's the same ignorant people who thought OJ was framed. Yes, Chicago cops have lied to justify a shooting and one cop got busted for framing people. Considering there are over 10k Chicago cops, this idea that cops are just going around busting poor, innocent people is BS.
Anonymous wrote:And now the Michelle Obama connection is coming to light...
Weeks before a grand jury indicted Smollett on the theory he falsely reported being the victim of a hate crime, relatives of the actor, who is black and gay, had expressed to Tchen "concerns about the investigation" by Chicago police.
Getting the right person to take those sort of concerns seriously has been a hallmark of Tchen's career, highlighted by a stint as then-first lady Michelle Obama's chief of staff and now by her work leading a probe of workplace culture at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
There is no human on earth that is credible enough ... we should always use physical evidence.
There's more than enough physical evidence to convict Smollett.
The prosecutor has lost all credibility.
There is literally no physical evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
There is no human on earth that is credible enough ... we should always use physical evidence.
There's more than enough physical evidence to convict Smollett.
The prosecutor has lost all credibility.
There is literally no physical evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
There is no human on earth that is credible enough ... we should always use physical evidence.
There's more than enough physical evidence to convict Smollett.
The prosecutor has lost all credibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
There is no human on earth that is credible enough ... we should always use physical evidence.
There's more than enough physical evidence to convict Smollett.
The prosecutor has lost all credibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
There is no human on earth that is credible enough ... we should always use physical evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was curious how other folks were reacting, so I asked my Black friend and she said all of her people thought he was totally 100% innocent and framed by Chicago PD because Chicago PD has a habit of framing black folks. I thought that was an interesting view of how different groups were viewing this.
My H is a white cop and while he doesn't think they framed him he think the compromised the investigation so much that it would be impossible to prove in court and actually unable to prove either way.
There is no way to prove the cops did not feed the brothers the "they got paid" story to save face since they obviously came out immediately treating Jussie as a suspect instead of a victim.
Maybe if cops didn't frame innocent people so often, they'd have more credibility when they say someone is guilty. Just a thought.