Anonymous wrote:By the way, before anyone goes quoting the "Manifesto" you would do wise, very wise, to read the Bellingcat's review of it and how much of it is just troll bait copy and paste to throw off investigators. A must read if you are interested in using this for your arguments...
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2019/03/15/shitposting-inspirational-terrorism-and-the-christchurch-mosque-massacre/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".
And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.
Sounds like Antifa
? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?
Read what he said. What he actually said
The quote is from the manifesto.. what he actually wrote.
I'm well aware. He's saying he used a gun to trigger the left into action, not as a support for 2A
He's a white supremacist. How does that trigger the left into action? He wants to start a race war. That's the ideal of the right wing white nationalists in this country, not the left. You seem confused.
You may want to read up on the Klans beginnings and up through it's history on which party they were for or against from reconstruction thru the 50's before casting stones.
? I don't really care what some white nut jobs thought 100 years ago. I care about what's happening now, and how Trump's white nationalist agenda seems to now have infected other countries. We've exported our hate.
NP. It's exhausting that you constantly blame violence by white supremacists on Trump or his "agenda" - which, btw, seeks to end ILLEGAL and not LEGAL immigration.
Regardless of this wacko agenda you and your fellow liberals love to peddle, Trump is not a "white supremacist/nationalist." He just isn't, and it's beyond pathetic that this is the narrative you keep trying to push. You may hate the man, and disagree with his politics - but he's not a white supremacist. And everytime you claim otherwise, you continue to lose credibilty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".
And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.
Sounds like Antifa
? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?
Read what he said. What he actually said
The quote is from the manifesto.. what he actually wrote.
I'm well aware. He's saying he used a gun to trigger the left into action, not as a support for 2A
He's a white supremacist. How does that trigger the left into action? He wants to start a race war. That's the ideal of the right wing white nationalists in this country, not the left. You seem confused.
You may want to read up on the Klans beginnings and up through it's history on which party they were for or against from reconstruction thru the 50's before casting stones.
? I don't really care what some white nut jobs thought 100 years ago. I care about what's happening now, and how Trump's white nationalist agenda seems to now have infected other countries. We've exported our hate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like another Anders Behring Breivik.
He claims in his manifesto to have received a "blessing" from Breivik. This should be investigated.
For background - this murderer slaughtered dozens a and dozens of teens in Norway, after creating another rambling insane "manifesto." Also set off a bomb in Oslo.
Anyone know if he had any "eco" angle to his manifesto?
Yes, seriously. Please discuss coherently if you can, dear ecofascist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".
And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.
Sounds like Antifa
? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?
Read what he said. What he actually said
The quote is from the manifesto.. what he actually wrote.
I'm well aware. He's saying he used a gun to trigger the left into action, not as a support for 2A
He's a white supremacist. How does that trigger the left into action? He wants to start a race war. That's the ideal of the right wing white nationalists in this country, not the left. You seem confused.
You may want to read up on the Klans beginnings and up through it's history on which party they were for or against from reconstruction thru the 50's before casting stones.
? I don't really care what some white nut jobs thought 100 years ago. I care about what's happening now, and how Trump's white nationalist agenda seems to now have infected other countries. We've exported our hate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like another Anders Behring Breivik.
He claims in his manifesto to have received a "blessing" from Breivik. This should be investigated.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.
Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist
Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.
Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.
New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.
Quite the trend.
I think we should stop calling them supremacists. They are just killers. Killers that are white. We need to stop dividing killers by race. It just feeds the divide. Killing is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".
And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.
Sounds like Antifa
? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?
Read what he said. What he actually said
The quote is from the manifesto.. what he actually wrote.
I'm well aware. He's saying he used a gun to trigger the left into action, not as a support for 2A
He's a white supremacist. How does that trigger the left into action? He wants to start a race war. That's the ideal of the right wing white nationalists in this country, not the left. You seem confused.
You may want to read up on the Klans beginnings and up through it's history on which party they were for or against from reconstruction thru the 50's before casting stones.
jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.
Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist
Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.
Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.
New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.
Quite the trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did it for the US and admits that he's a terrorist:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
"By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force."
He boasted that he chose to use firearms so he could influence politics in the US.
He wrote that he wanted to "create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide".
And he ranted about his hopes that “this conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”
Congratulations to the gun nutters here. You have a brother in arms across the world.
Sounds like Antifa
? Which antifa member shot up a bunch of people in the name of the 2a.?
Read what he said. What he actually said
The quote is from the manifesto.. what he actually wrote.
I'm well aware. He's saying he used a gun to trigger the left into action, not as a support for 2A
He's a white supremacist. How does that trigger the left into action? He wants to start a race war. That's the ideal of the right wing white nationalists in this country, not the left. You seem confused.