Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:she should’ve married the French guy or whatever he was.. he was popping
You mean The Russian (mikhail baryshnikov)?? That pairing was a flop, they had zero chemistry.
they were supposed to have zero chemistry. it was a cerebral relationship.
Carrie? Cerebral?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rewatching this show lately and in my early thirties these women and their life situations are horrifying.
Is this show supposed to be an urban dating dystopia?
What a strange twisted world with strange twisted people who prize shoes and scowl at babies!
And...what is the ultimate point is the show trying to make?
These women live this materialistic, hedonistic life and...are left so utterly lonely and unhappy. Season 6 is painful to watch:
- Carrie has wasted away her limited looks chasing after a bougie who sees her as nothing more than a trashy bootycall. She destroys the only decent guy with whom she had a shot with for having a traditional family and life with. So she is left old and lonely and settles for being a bootycall for an old Russian?
- Charlotte wastes away her twenties and thirties throwing out perfectly good men because of her ridiculous standards. She arrives at 37 reproductive challenged and desperate and changes her religion to be with a guy she would never have even glanced at in her twenties!
- Miranda spends her youth chasing the dollars and someone with her brains and smarts ends up with a dopey uneducated bartender? WTF?
- Sam is a lost cause. I get grossed out looking at her.
What a strange twisted show!
Just because someone doesn't want children or a husband doesn't mean they're a lost cause, Debra.
But they DID want a husband and children (minus Sam).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’m binge watching SATC episodes this evening and I find her so appallingly awful!
She’s a 30sometbing, has no savings, still rents an apartment, is materialistic and shallow and chases a creepy unavailable jerk!
Wait! She’s not a loser. She’s able to afford a tricked out designer wardrobe and eat out all the time on a salary where she just has to crank out one column a week. Brilliant!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’m binge watching SATC episodes this evening and I find her so appallingly awful!
She’s a 30sometbing, has no savings, still rents an apartment, is materialistic and shallow and chases a creepy unavailable jerk!
I feel judged.
Anonymous wrote:So I’m binge watching SATC episodes this evening and I find her so appallingly awful!
She’s a 30sometbing, has no savings, still rents an apartment, is materialistic and shallow and chases a creepy unavailable jerk!
Anonymous wrote:Oh man...
I was in my 20’s doing the New York thing 2000-2008.
That show was like watching a terrifying docudrama on what could happen to you if you don’t grow up.
Nothing depressed me more than sex and the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought that was the whole point of the show: a cautionary tale.
Are you fo' real? A cautionary tale?![]()
The whole point of the show, just like every other show on air, is to entertain the audience. And the first couple of seasons were entertaining as hell! Early characters and their lines were witty and tremendously funny. But - like a wise PP noted above - the show went downhill once the writers started trying to bring more drama into it.
+1. Life was just a lot more fun back then, so you could watch a ridiculous show and know it was ridiculous. I wasn't out there buying an insane wardrobe or acting like any of those girls just because I was watching the show. It was just entertainment. Now I feel if the show doesn't have some deep meaning or a social justice angle, people aren't interested in watching it.
Agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought that was the whole point of the show: a cautionary tale.
Are you fo' real? A cautionary tale?![]()
The whole point of the show, just like every other show on air, is to entertain the audience. And the first couple of seasons were entertaining as hell! Early characters and their lines were witty and tremendously funny. But - like a wise PP noted above - the show went downhill once the writers started trying to bring more drama into it.
+1. Life was just a lot more fun back then, so you could watch a ridiculous show and know it was ridiculous. I wasn't out there buying an insane wardrobe or acting like any of those girls just because I was watching the show. It was just entertainment. Now I feel if the show doesn't have some deep meaning or a social justice angle, people aren't interested in watching it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rewatching this show lately and in my early thirties these women and their life situations are horrifying.
Is this show supposed to be an urban dating dystopia?
What a strange twisted world with strange twisted people who prize shoes and scowl at babies!
And...what is the ultimate point is the show trying to make?
These women live this materialistic, hedonistic life and...are left so utterly lonely and unhappy. Season 6 is painful to watch:
- Carrie has wasted away her limited looks chasing after a bougie who sees her as nothing more than a trashy bootycall. She destroys the only decent guy with whom she had a shot with for having a traditional family and life with. So she is left old and lonely and settles for being a bootycall for an old Russian?
- Charlotte wastes away her twenties and thirties throwing out perfectly good men because of her ridiculous standards. She arrives at 37 reproductive challenged and desperate and changes her religion to be with a guy she would never have even glanced at in her twenties!
- Miranda spends her youth chasing the dollars and someone with her brains and smarts ends up with a dopey uneducated bartender? WTF?
- Sam is a lost cause. I get grossed out looking at her.
What a strange twisted show!
Just because someone doesn't want children or a husband doesn't mean they're a lost cause, Debra.
Anonymous wrote:Oh man...
I was in my 20’s doing the New York thing 2000-2008.
That show was like watching a terrifying docudrama on what could happen to you if you don’t grow up.
Nothing depressed me more than sex and the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought that was the whole point of the show: a cautionary tale.
Are you fo' real? A cautionary tale?![]()
The whole point of the show, just like every other show on air, is to entertain the audience. And the first couple of seasons were entertaining as hell! Early characters and their lines were witty and tremendously funny. But - like a wise PP noted above - the show went downhill once the writers started trying to bring more drama into it.