Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Ok, Aunt Lydia. We know you want to make it “great”.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:You can put lipstick on a pig, but IT'S STILL A PIG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Please show me in the US Constitution where the United States of America is a Christian nation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The attempted shaming of Karen Pence is a condensed symbol for the elite secular left’s hatred of conservative Christians and our morals and mores.” - Rod Dreher
Hahahahahahaha people who elected Trump talking morals and mores hahahahahahahaha I'm crying
Anonymous wrote:“The attempted shaming of Karen Pence is a condensed symbol for the elite secular left’s hatred of conservative Christians and our morals and mores.” - Rod Dreher
Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Anonymous wrote:“The attempted shaming of Karen Pence is a condensed symbol for the elite secular left’s hatred of conservative Christians and our morals and mores.” - Rod Dreher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Principles like freedom for all, no matter what their race, gender, religion, physical ability, or sexual orientation!
The interview comes after news reports that Karen Pence would be teaching art at a private school that requires potential employees to pledge that they believe marriage is between a man and a woman and that they do not engage in "homosexual or lesbian sexual activity" or "transgender identity," according to the employment application.
Parents are also required to sign a clause indicating that the school "reserves the right" to refuse admission to or discontinue enrollment of a student if their activities are "in opposition to the biblical lifestyle the school teaches."
Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what? It's a Christian school. Obviously many Christians believe that engaging in same sex sexual behavior is a sin. Are Christians now required to accept same sex relations?
It’s funny how when you put it like that you realize how much they have in common with conservative Muslims. Maybe some day they’ll realize that too.
Same sex relations is condemned by all religions.
Liar.
+infinity
The Episcopalian church holds gay marriages, has gay bishops, has trans clergy, and does not condemn trans or gay. I am proud that my local church was protested by Westboro for this reason.
It's been discussed on the religion forum, but the prior presiding bishop Schori made more than a few heretical comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ben Shapiro on Twitter:
“Which is more discriminatory: a private school requiring that its voluntary attendees abide by a code of conduct, or people saying such a school should not exist because that school disagrees with their ideas?”
Or C) one group of people saying another group of people shouldn’t exist. I’ll go with C as most discriminatory.
Except “A”never said that about “C”
If I tell you that your heterosexuality is immoral and you have to become gay that is pretty much the equivalent of saying you should not exist as you truly are. If I tell a black man he must be a white woman, that is the equivalent of me saying he shouldn't exist as he truly is.
Conservative Christians don't think gays should exist. Period.
No, they hate the sin, not the sinner.
They're of the belief that homosexuals should not act on those impulses. They also believe that those who truly repent for a sin should be forgiven, rather than tolerating sins.
Feel free to disagree, but you don't understand the religious right.
I’m a minister. I have lots of minister friends. Every single one would call bullshit on that ridiculous excuse. Being gay is part of who someone is. You cannot “hate the sin” without hating the sinner. That would be like me saying I hate women. But I love you. It’s a cop out that cowardly ”Christians “ use to justify hate.
As a minister you should be well aware of the 6 things God hates. Proverbs 6:16-19
Anonymous wrote:Once again, the curiously ignorant reaction by a small vocal group in the progressive movement has demonstrated how incompatible their ideas and goals are with the principles that has made this country great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The attempted shaming of Karen Pence is a condensed symbol for the elite secular left’s hatred of conservative Christians and our morals and mores.” - Rod Dreher
No, see, we don’t hate the sinner (conservative Christians), just the sin (non-acceptance of LGBTQ).