Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t you just put your IL’s in a taxi and you and Larla ride the public bus?
How is dragging someone who is out of shape and with swollen feet making this a trip for them?
And then you’re upset because they want to be able to sit and watch TV and likely put their feet up when they are babysitting your kid? They don’t want to be up chasing her around and having to entertain her after a full day of walking.
They refuse to pay for a cab. We’ve suggested it many times. The TV thing wasn’t an issue. It was “make sure I have my shows. It’s buffering!!”
This was after DH spent an hour setting up a proxy server so they could watch live American TV on his laptop.
We didn’t expect them to chase her. We put her down before we left so all they had to do is sit in the room and watch TV.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow OP, I was sympathetic at first, but honestly now I just feel sorry for your inlaws. They are on their first trip ever to Europe, your husband is working in the hotel, and you are dragging them on some ridiculous excursion by public bus (and getting lost in the process) just because you don’t feel safe putting little precious in a London cab without a car seat, even though the ridiculously protectionist British government says it’s perfectly legal to do so. Maybe it’s you who isn’t cut out for foreign travel. Just wow.
Not to mention the fact that most of London is so congested they drive about 15 mph.
You speak English and you got lost, yet you're making fun of your elderly ILs who have never been out of the country for the same.
Peach.
I got lost once for 10 minutes in a huge traffic circle, trying to find a small side street.
Far from making fun of them, I’m frustrated with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I bet your MIL is hunkered down in her hotel room right now, composing a thread about her completely useless daughter in law who dragged her to Europe to babysit, and who got lost for 10 minutes trying to find the Tower of London on her supposed fourth trip to the city, while she and her husband were doing their best to keep their mouths shut.
To be clear, it was a side street on the way. If you’ve never gotten lost in London it’s just because you’ve never spent much time here. There’s no system to the streets.
Also, they volunteered to babysit. If they hadn’t we never would have expected it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP: my teen aged DDs were seasoned travelers but on an extended trip at about the week point like your ILs they just wanted familiarity. They found a place called Johnny Rockets (it truly wasn’t THE chain. I stomped off angry that they weren’t taking in all the culture etc etc. That recharged them and changed mood for all. Why not make tomorrow a super simple ‘familiar’ day for them. Your vision of breezing through all the sights and sounds obviously is not theirs. They are thrilled to be included so embrace that and see the trip from their eyes as much as you can.
I will try to do that for them. It’s a good idea.
This trip really was meant to be for them. They kept talking about wanting to go to London and Rome and were telling all their friends how amazing it is that we organized this trip. I never got the impression they thought being with our toddler was a hindrance; if anything they keep wanting more time with her. I think they just underestimated how unfamiliar everything would be (even in London!) and are overwhelmed. My MIL is significantly overweight and said her feet were swollen after 2 days. We’ve been really trying to keep things slow for them, especially after hearing that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A two week vacation abroad with your ILs who don't regularly travel.
Were you actually high when you agreed to this OP????
There is no way on earth that was going to go well. None.
Get through it and don't agree to something like that again.
This. Plus 1 bajillion.
What were you thinking, OP?
I can barely stand my MIL for Thanksgiving; the thought of travelling with her provincial ass to Europe would simply never cross my mind.
It was DH’s idea. He wanted to help them do something they said they always wanted to do.
Anonymous wrote:I travel with in laws like this. I actually enjoy the dynamic because I get to be completely in charge and don't have to feel guilty about it! I decide where we sightsee, what we eat, and they just come along. I actually think it's great - no arguments. I get to be a bit bossy about my kids and our itinerary and NO ONE MINDS it! Score.
As for babysitting, we get date nights but only after setting up the kids for bed. Luckily in Europe everything stays open late so if I get to dinner with my husband at 8:30, it's not weird.
My advice: accept the status quo. It won't change. Don't expect what won't happen from them. Release yourself from expectations, enjoy the ability to be a tour guide and make yourself go out with your husband at night just the two of you, even if you are tired from a day of touring.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t you just put your IL’s in a taxi and you and Larla ride the public bus?
How is dragging someone who is out of shape and with swollen feet making this a trip for them?
And then you’re upset because they want to be able to sit and watch TV and likely put their feet up when they are babysitting your kid? They don’t want to be up chasing her around and having to entertain her after a full day of walking.
Anonymous wrote:I bet your MIL is hunkered down in her hotel room right now, composing a thread about her completely useless daughter in law who dragged her to Europe to babysit, and who got lost for 10 minutes trying to find the Tower of London on her supposed fourth trip to the city, while she and her husband were doing their best to keep their mouths shut.