Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of people are calling out D’s in North Arlington, and it is richly deserved. It’s not one poster.
Arlington has some deep problems and this name doesn’t rank. Change it. Don’t change it. Whatever.
Let’s not pretend we live our values. This is virtue signaling. That’s all.
There she is. Go play with your new friend. You can find ways to stab each other in the back.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of people are calling out D’s in North Arlington, and it is richly deserved. It’s not one poster.
Arlington has some deep problems and this name doesn’t rank. Change it. Don’t change it. Whatever.
Let’s not pretend we live our values. This is virtue signaling. That’s all.
Anonymous wrote:
PP whines every day about the horrible Ds in NORTH Arlington. It's getting old. And completely irrelevant to this thread. Go start a new thread if you want to whine, argumentative twit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did I ever defend Lee as a name. I do have to admit it is an appropriate albatross to hang on the neck of the Democrats.
Frankly, the easiest solution would be to just rename the W-L mascot to the "Traitors."
Ok. Let’s rename the high school then. End of discussion.
You can go start a new thread to whine about how you’ve been wronged by Ds.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When did I ever defend Lee as a name. I do have to admit it is an appropriate albatross to hang on the neck of the Democrats.
Frankly, the easiest solution would be to just rename the W-L mascot to the "Traitors."
Ok. Let’s rename the high school then. End of discussion.
You can go start a new thread to whine about how you’ve been wronged by Ds.![]()
Anonymous wrote:When did I ever defend Lee as a name. I do have to admit it is an appropriate albatross to hang on the neck of the Democrats.
Frankly, the easiest solution would be to just rename the W-L mascot to the "Traitors."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
LOL. You nutters have active imaginations.![]()
And what was the source of your fabulous history education?
Anonymous wrote:
LOL. You nutters have active imaginations.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Lincoln had to make a strategic concessions. Yes, they had slaves but, he didn't want to DC to be surrounded by the enemy. He would have lost the union and then slavery would still exist. This way, he got the four states on his side and then when they won slavery could be abolished and it was. Too bad Lincoln was murdered because the South basically ruled by fear and kept blacks in slavery without the name slavery.
Now we are getting closer. The real agenda was for this renaming to be done quietly. The Democratic Party needs to rewrite history and whitewash the past QUIETLY. The can't let people realize that the Democrats were the party of the Old South, of slavery, of Jim Crow, of Bull Conner, and of Woodrow Wilson. Can't have anyone realize that the KKK was the militant wing of the Democrats during Reconstruction. That being said, Robert E Lee wasn't the worst Democrat of that era. That "honor" would likely fall to Nathan Bedford Forrest.