Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
MCPS prohibits this on the basis of equity, full stop. And rightfully so.
That's like saying there should be an extra 25% tax on the rich. But, rather than using that money to help the poor, build roads, fund healthcare, etc - you simply burn the money.
The rich having less is more "equitable," even though it hasn't help the poor or society more broadly in the process.
No. It’s basically to avoid creating private public schools, where wealthy families are able to fund their schools themselves and eventually seek to lower taxes to not have to fund schools in poorer neighborhoods. It also makes sure that funding decisions are centralized and traceable to a central authority for accountability and mission
We are talking about having an aide in the classroom to assist the teacher. That hardly renders a public school private as wouldn't be near enough for people to decide schools didn't need to be adequately funded. And as for accountability, the aide is accountable first to the teacher who is in charge of the teacher and is next managed by the principal (and assistants and others school management) who is then managed by the various layers of MoCo bureaucracy.
There is more than to ensure that an aide - who would barely set any classroom policies, never mind anything broader - remains accountable and consistent with the mission.
And why is that equitable in terms of my kid’s school which has much less money in the pta.
I used to think this way too. Listen, life isn't fair. Work harder and move into that school or get an apartment in that district. Would it be better to lower the total amount of money to fund the schools? Because that's what been happening. We have had more concern about equity than education in this county - that's a real issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
We moved to London 2 years ago, almost every school has exactly 30 kids in every class and there are waiting lists for every grade level at most schools. Every time a child moves there is a new kid in the spot just a day or 2 later.There are 4 classes at each grade level and 2 teaching assistants for each grade level who basically pull kids out for extra help in small groups.
The class sizes are “big” compared to US, but the education my children are getting is fantastic. I seriously don’t know where my kids can go to school when we move back the MCPS schools we toured were really sad looking in comparison, facilities and programming. I don’t think class size is the problem.
Are you speaking of private pay schools in the UK? I don’t think you can compare to public school. Or if it’s public, how can they have a waiting list?
Anonymous wrote:Or if it’s public, how can they have a waiting list?
I've seen this in public schools in other areas. If your home school is at capacity when you move in, you are automatically transferred to another school within the district that is not at capacity. You're put on a waiting list until a spot opens up at your home school. It keeps the schools from being over crowded but drives more people toward private if the transfer school is lower performing than the home school.
Or if it’s public, how can they have a waiting list?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
We moved to London 2 years ago, almost every school has exactly 30 kids in every class and there are waiting lists for every grade level at most schools. Every time a child moves there is a new kid in the spot just a day or 2 later.There are 4 classes at each grade level and 2 teaching assistants for each grade level who basically pull kids out for extra help in small groups.
The class sizes are “big” compared to US, but the education my children are getting is fantastic. I seriously don’t know where my kids can go to school when we move back the MCPS schools we toured were really sad looking in comparison, facilities and programming. I don’t think class size is the problem.
Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told.
Look at the website again - it's a student/staff ratio on the website, and for staff they are including the secretary, building service staff, cafeteria staff, etc. Its not that they have you misinformation, they just weren't giving you the teacher/student ratio per class, and instead were giving the student/staff ratio.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
MCPS prohibits this on the basis of equity, full stop. And rightfully so.
That's like saying there should be an extra 25% tax on the rich. But, rather than using that money to help the poor, build roads, fund healthcare, etc - you simply burn the money.
The rich having less is more "equitable," even though it hasn't help the poor or society more broadly in the process.
No. It’s basically to avoid creating private public schools, where wealthy families are able to fund their schools themselves and eventually seek to lower taxes to not have to fund schools in poorer neighborhoods. It also makes sure that funding decisions are centralized and traceable to a central authority for accountability and mission
We are talking about having an aide in the classroom to assist the teacher. That hardly renders a public school private as wouldn't be near enough for people to decide schools didn't need to be adequately funded. And as for accountability, the aide is accountable first to the teacher who is in charge of the teacher and is next managed by the principal (and assistants and others school management) who is then managed by the various layers of MoCo bureaucracy.
There is more than to ensure that an aide - who would barely set any classroom policies, never mind anything broader - remains accountable and consistent with the mission.
And why is that equitable in terms of my kid’s school which has much less money in the pta.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
MCPS prohibits this on the basis of equity, full stop. And rightfully so.
That's like saying there should be an extra 25% tax on the rich. But, rather than using that money to help the poor, build roads, fund healthcare, etc - you simply burn the money.
The rich having less is more "equitable," even though it hasn't help the poor or society more broadly in the process.
No. It’s basically to avoid creating private public schools, where wealthy families are able to fund their schools themselves and eventually seek to lower taxes to not have to fund schools in poorer neighborhoods. It also makes sure that funding decisions are centralized and traceable to a central authority for accountability and mission
We are talking about having an aide in the classroom to assist the teacher. That hardly renders a public school private as wouldn't be near enough for people to decide schools didn't need to be adequately funded. And as for accountability, the aide is accountable first to the teacher who is in charge of the teacher and is next managed by the principal (and assistants and others school management) who is then managed by the various layers of MoCo bureaucracy.
There is more than to ensure that an aide - who would barely set any classroom policies, never mind anything broader - remains accountable and consistent with the mission.
And why is that equitable in terms of my kid’s school which has much less money in the pta.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
I don't think there is much the principal can do. Or the PTA. MCPS doesn't allow the PTAs to fund extra staff.
It's just the way it is, unfortunately.
Hi Beowulf start by attacking this issue. My wife and I cannot keep taking off work to volunteer in our children’s K and 1st grade. They teacher and students need more adults in the room, teaching students, helping students, providing feedback to students/parents.
My wife and I also cannot keep up with the supplementing at home due to our FT jobs and travel. We quickly noticed how many families only use MCPS for half of their child’s academic education- they use summer camps, tutors, part homeschooling , after school and weekend classes for supplementing holes and subjects MCPS barely touches until middle school. This is not how public school used to be.
Real shame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
I sympathize and agree with you, but nothing is going to change. It’s honestly pointless to try.
It is always worth bringing it up again and again.
MCPS wants to train you and your kids to shut up and take it. Keep emailing. Keep talking to them. Agree that emailing state on the cc or in To line is a great idea too. This stuff adds up. When we left for NE DC we said in writing why and emailed it up and down the chain. Don’t trust the “feedback loop” even exisits in public sector. Everyone is just after more retirement benefits and juicers positions. They won’t alway pass along your concern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
OP, I agree with you and I'm sorry you've had this surprise. Your best bet would be the Board of Ed and your local elected officials, or those up for election. CC the State Superintendent of Education. You're preaching to the choir with the PTA and Principal - these decisions are made way above their heads.
Complain to everyone. Board of Ed, County Council, get involved with the MCCPTA not just your school’s PTA. There was a big push in case sizes 2-3 years ago and the “guidelines” came down by 1 student. They are not hard cut-offs, but guidelines unfortunately. For this particular year you could try the BOE and Councilmember for your district for starters. Making noise is about all you can do and hope they are hearing from others too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Remember, MCPS goals are to close the achievement gap between hispanics/blacks and whites/asians, and have everyone graduate at a level of proficiency to be able to go to community college.
If you have other goals, do them yourself. They will use the $2.2B budget to pay themselves, their benefits and help the bottom with food, healthcare, english, childcare, reading and math.
I've read this assertion multiple times on DCUM. Nobody has ever produced any evidence to support this assertion.
Why do we have to satisfy you? Go read the MCPS presentations and documents - it's very clear, they began laying this out years ago, and we've seen the policies being enacted.
D
Generally it's the responsibility of the person making the assertion to provide the evidence to support the assertion.
But if you don't want to, then you don't have to. It's an anonymous Internet message board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
MCPS prohibits this on the basis of equity, full stop. And rightfully so.
That's like saying there should be an extra 25% tax on the rich. But, rather than using that money to help the poor, build roads, fund healthcare, etc - you simply burn the money.
The rich having less is more "equitable," even though it hasn't help the poor or society more broadly in the process.
No. It’s basically to avoid creating private public schools, where wealthy families are able to fund their schools themselves and eventually seek to lower taxes to not have to fund schools in poorer neighborhoods. It also makes sure that funding decisions are centralized and traceable to a central authority for accountability and mission
We are talking about having an aide in the classroom to assist the teacher. That hardly renders a public school private as wouldn't be near enough for people to decide schools didn't need to be adequately funded. And as for accountability, the aide is accountable first to the teacher who is in charge of the teacher and is next managed by the principal (and assistants and others school management) who is then managed by the various layers of MoCo bureaucracy.
There is more than to ensure that an aide - who would barely set any classroom policies, never mind anything broader - remains accountable and consistent with the mission.