Anonymous wrote:Can we talk about the choir? They all looked and sounded phenomenal!
Anonymous wrote:I think she could have stuck to $10K or less for a dress and used the rest for charity.
The dress is pretty but could have been done exactly the same way for a fraction, and the rest would be them putting their money where their mouths are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do women fall all over themselves analyzing wedding dresses to death? Men don't do such crap. It's a wedding dress, the wedding is over. Get over it. No one gives a shit about whether you liked it, hated it or could have improved it. Get over YOURSELVES!
Yeah, but what did you think of the dress
+1
Men don't spend $100,000 plus on a suit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do women fall all over themselves analyzing wedding dresses to death? Men don't do such crap. It's a wedding dress, the wedding is over. Get over it. No one gives a shit about whether you liked it, hated it or could have improved it. Get over YOURSELVES!
Yeah, but what did you think of the dress
+1
Men don't spend $100,000 plus on a suit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do women fall all over themselves analyzing wedding dresses to death? Men don't do such crap. It's a wedding dress, the wedding is over. Get over it. No one gives a shit about whether you liked it, hated it or could have improved it. Get over YOURSELVES!
Yeah, but what did you think of the dress
Anonymous wrote:Why do women fall all over themselves analyzing wedding dresses to death? Men don't do such crap. It's a wedding dress, the wedding is over. Get over it. No one gives a shit about whether you liked it, hated it or could have improved it. Get over YOURSELVES!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't like either one. I thought Diana's dress was beautiful.
Do you still think so? It’s 1980s meringue.
NP. I was 8yrs old when Charles and Diana got married and I thought it was the ultimate in princess, fairytale wedding dresses. Most beautiful thing I’d ever seen. Now I find it very dated to the 80s but still amazing for what it was.
NP. I still adore Diana's dress -- the luxurious fabric that shimmered! The detailing! The bows and lace! Still adore it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan’s dress was disappointing. Bland and boring.
+ 1
Plus, in some photos, the top/sleeves looked too big. Very disappointing!
Anonymous wrote:
I am very happy Meghan choose a sleek, unadorned, style. It suits her perfectly. That's what I thought she should wear.
However! It does not seem to be properly fitted - perhaps she lost a little weight. The heavy fabric doesn't sit that well on her small frame - I would have gone with a lighter silk, perhaps weighing the ends. I am also not fond of the clash of different whites (shoes, dress and veil). I also wish she had not chosen such a delicate veil, or had a veil at all, because it is not in keeping with the dress.
But overall, a much better choice, for her, than anything with lace or ruffles.
I agree. The minimalist dress should have had a minimalist veil.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am very happy Meghan choose a sleek, unadorned, style. It suits her perfectly. That's what I thought she should wear.
However! It does not seem to be properly fitted - perhaps she lost a little weight. The heavy fabric doesn't sit that well on her small frame - I would have gone with a lighter silk, perhaps weighing the ends. I am also not fond of the clash of different whites (shoes, dress and veil). I also wish she had not chosen such a delicate veil, or had a veil at all, because it is not in keeping with the dress.
But overall, a much better choice, for her, than anything with lace or ruffles.
I agree. The minimalist dress should have had a minimalist veil.
The minimalist dress should have been perfectly fitted. It wasn't. Loved the dress, wish it fit her perfectly like Kate's did (even though I didn't care for that dress).