Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The odds are just horrible for women. More men than women are immature, irresponsible, selfish, lacking in empathy etc.
You sound overflowing with empathy yourself. How about: the odds are horrible for women who act horrible. Or who have no apparent interest in sex of course.
The odds are horrible for women in general, even the ones who act well.
Keep blaming lack of sex as the reason why you choose to be an asshole to your spouse and a less than adequate parent to your children. I will keep calling BS.
Anonymous wrote:The odds are just horrible for women. More men than women are immature, irresponsible, selfish, lacking in empathy etc.
You sound overflowing with empathy yourself. How about: the odds are horrible for women who act horrible. Or who have no apparent interest in sex of course.
The odds are just horrible for women. More men than women are immature, irresponsible, selfish, lacking in empathy etc.
Anonymous wrote:I assume she's smart, given how many women on DCUM (and in real life) complain that their husbands are basically another child and that life is much easier after divorce.
Women stay busy with careers in their 20s and 30s if they haven’t found any one insanely perfect. But if a perfect guy came along, they would absolutely be able to make time for him. It’s a convenient excuse to say they are too busy with work in the mean time
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted a child more than a spouse, so that is what I did. I adopted. Still single. Very happy!!
Anonymous wrote:I have an unmarried friend who is a great catch and honestly, I think the reason is that she is so incredibly rigid. It is her way or the highway and her way is 100% right and other people are 100% wrong. She wouldn’t even be able to compromise with a man she was dating. You can be friends with a person but in marriage they are impossible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A woman who is fertile and unmarried and over 30 is a man repellant.
I'll let Amal Clooney and Meghan Windsor know what you think of them the next time we chat.![]()
Look what type of guy it took to make them agree to marry. They didn't need a man, they needed a superman
Precisely. There's nothing wrong with having standards. Personally I'd rather have either of these than a middle of the road schlump. The fact that both of them were rich single women is just icing on the cake. I'm willing to bet Meghan's going to be preggers next year (at 37!) and I'm hoping for twins.
![]()
Of course she'll be pregnant...even if It's fake and she uses a surrogate. That is literally going to be her job...produce an heir. Feminist everywhere rejoice
Wow, someone's jealous.
Just for reference - there's already five direct heirs to the throne and none of them will be sourced from Meghan.
Those being:
Prince Charles
Prince William
Prince George
Princess Charlotte
Prince Louis
Which means Meggie can have as many beautiful babies with her hot royal ginger as she likes - zero pressure. As for her job, I'm thinking she'll keep on being a humanitarian like quite a few 'feminists' you could learn something from.
Considering my husband is not a racist who was barely able to finish school despite all the private tutors and who clearly has Mommy issues, I'd say Meggie is going to be the jealous one
She's not worrying about you or your opinion so you should stop wasting your time worrying about her