Anonymous wrote:OP here. She is in a cast and my son is sick. How could she even properly care for him? She has never babysat a kid before, doesn't live here full time and is not used to him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How old is DS?
Just turned 4. And he is home sick today.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to those who gave constructive advice. To the others..I posted for a reality check and I guess I'm getting one.
I love my step daughter very much and the fact that she has never baby sat before (yes I know she hasn't we have discussed it), is in a cast, and visits infrequently doesn't change that. I don't think she should have been put in this situation either and I highly doubt she wanted to.
I suppose my thinking is that a minimum, my husband should have discussed this with me as I would have done with him. I still don't think someone in a cast, especially one who is a kid herself, is fully able to care for a sick but highly active child.
Since she just turned 13 last week, and my son just turned 4 the week before, yes I guess I consider them both pretty young.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to those who gave constructive advice. To the others..I posted for a reality check and I guess I'm getting one.
I love my step daughter very much and the fact that she has never baby sat before (yes I know she hasn't we have discussed it), is in a cast, and visits infrequently doesn't change that. I don't think she should have been put in this situation either and I highly doubt she wanted to.
I suppose my thinking is that a minimum, my husband should have discussed this with me as I would have done with him. I still don't think someone in a cast, especially one who is a kid herself, is fully able to care for a sick but highly active child.
Since she just turned 13 last week, and my son just turned 4 the week before, yes I guess I consider them both pretty young.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. She is in a cast and my son is sick. How could she even properly care for him? She has never babysat a kid before, doesn't live here full time and is not used to him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Children are not visitors. This is such poisonous language. And equating your children (which is what you should think about your husband's children from any marriage) to friends' teenage kids is appalling. They are there to spend time with their FAMILY which is not just dad and CERTAINLY includes SIBLINGS.
Yes, they are if they are not there 50/50. You can try as hard as you want but they are visitors if they are there just a few days a month. My husband's kids were visitors in our home when mom would actually allow them to come. We'd spend a fortune in court and on plane tickets, she'd refuse and judge would just tell her to send them next time with no consequences. They were absolutely visitors. I wouldn't expect them to do anything in our home, including care for our kids. Its not their job. They are our kids and our responsibility. No 13 year old wants to spend a snow day with a sick 4 year old.
I was that child and my stepmother didn't treat me like a visitor. You're a piece of crap. You should have done that, you should have made them feel like they were a part of the family, because that is what they were.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
It's her brother. Siblings are expected to babysit once in awhile and it's good for them to bond 1 on 1. It wasn't even the whole day. Part of the problem is that OP is treating the step DD as if she is a guest/stranger and not family - and I get your point about the DD being a visitor, but it's still her brother and her dad. OP really changed her tone after her initial post - this is about her not liking the step DD and her own control issues with how she wants "HER" family to operate.
Would she flip out if it was her own daughter babysitting her younger brother? Or is it that much different because the hypothetical bio DD would live there?
Its her half brother and I meant the biological mother, not stepmom may have an issue with it. Yes, it is different if she were living there full-time but she isn't and yes, she is a visitor. Don't want kids to be visitors in Dad's home then give them 50/50.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Children are not visitors. This is such poisonous language. And equating your children (which is what you should think about your husband's children from any marriage) to friends' teenage kids is appalling. They are there to spend time with their FAMILY which is not just dad and CERTAINLY includes SIBLINGS.
Yes, they are if they are not there 50/50. You can try as hard as you want but they are visitors if they are there just a few days a month. My husband's kids were visitors in our home when mom would actually allow them to come. We'd spend a fortune in court and on plane tickets, she'd refuse and judge would just tell her to send them next time with no consequences. They were absolutely visitors. I wouldn't expect them to do anything in our home, including care for our kids. Its not their job. They are our kids and our responsibility. No 13 year old wants to spend a snow day with a sick 4 year old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Children are not visitors. This is such poisonous language. And equating your children (which is what you should think about your husband's children from any marriage) to friends' teenage kids is appalling. They are there to spend time with their FAMILY which is not just dad and CERTAINLY includes SIBLINGS.