Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Oh, so when was a convenient time to out Roy Moore as a pedophile? i didn't realize for-profit media companies were required to align strategies with political parties.
Attraction to 16 to 18 year olds does not count as pedophilia. I get that you don't like the idea of a 30-year old dating 18-year olds, but they were all over the customary age of consent to kissing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Oh, so when was a convenient time to out Roy Moore as a pedophile? i didn't realize for-profit media companies were required to align strategies with political parties.
Attraction to 16 to 18 year olds does not count as pedophilia. I get that you don't like the idea of a 30-year old dating 18-year olds, but they were all over the customary age of consent to kissing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Oh, so when was a convenient time to out Roy Moore as a pedophile? i didn't realize for-profit media companies were required to align strategies with political parties.
Attraction to 16 to 18 year olds does not count as pedophilia. I get that you don't like the idea of a 30-year old dating 18-year olds, but they were all over the customary age of consent to kissing.
Anonymous wrote:Other than it looks bad to you, I'm sorry to say, not too many people will find it objectionable.
So he likes girls on the young side. They were all 16 to 18, certainly an age where girls date and have sexual relationships without raising eyebrows. If they were 12 or 13, that's another story. But 16+...meh. None of them reported forced contact or sexual relationship. So...what's the big deal? He couldn't have known he'd become a public figure. I get that you think a 30-year old should not be dating 16-year olds, and that's certainly a prudent point of view. But as far as I'm concerned, nothing criminal took place.
Anonymous wrote:Other than it looks bad to you, I'm sorry to say, not too many people will find it objectionable.
So he likes girls on the young side. They were all 16 to 18, certainly an age where girls date and have sexual relationships without raising eyebrows. If they were 12 or 13, that's another story. But 16+...meh. None of them reported forced contact or sexual relationship. So...what's the big deal? He couldn't have known he'd become a public figure. I get that you think a 30-year old should not be dating 16-year olds, and that's certainly a prudent point of view. But as far as I'm concerned, nothing criminal took place.
Anonymous wrote:Other than it looks bad to you, I'm sorry to say, not too many people will find it objectionable.
So he likes girls on the young side. They were all 16 to 18, certainly an age where girls date and have sexual relationships without raising eyebrows. If they were 12 or 13, that's another story. But 16+...meh. None of them reported forced contact or sexual relationship. So...what's the big deal? He couldn't have known he'd become a public figure. I get that you think a 30-year old should not be dating 16-year olds, and that's certainly a prudent point of view. But as far as I'm concerned, nothing criminal took place.
Anonymous wrote:Other than it looks bad to you, I'm sorry to say, not too many people will find it objectionable.
So he likes girls on the young side. They were all 16 to 18, certainly an age where girls date and have sexual relationships without raising eyebrows. If they were 12 or 13, that's another story. But 16+...meh. None of them reported forced contact or sexual relationship. So...what's the big deal? He couldn't have known he'd become a public figure. I get that you think a 30-year old should not be dating 16-year olds, and that's certainly a prudent point of view. But as far as I'm concerned, nothing criminal took place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Oh, so when was a convenient time to out Roy Moore as a pedophile? i didn't realize for-profit media companies were required to align strategies with political parties.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/woman-says-roy-moore-initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html
This changes the entire campaign. And, my guess, is that Jones knew about it through his contacts in various prosecutors offices.
No it doesn't. It's only a problem if a Dem does it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If liberals really believed this and that it would affect the outcome, they would want Moore to stay in the race.
Either they don't believe it or think it is not going to make a difference in the result. Seriously, unless there is tape of him doing something when she was 14, most Alabamans would believe that this is fake news whether it is or not. The timing is too suspect for one thing.
Keep telling yourself that. The moral depravity that makes up the GOP base wants nothing more than to victimize these (now) women for a second time. WWMD? What will McConnell do?
Alabamans are not going to believe this story that has been conveniently timed to come out right before the election.
Whether it is true or not, a story from the WAPO does not carry any credibility in Alabama.