Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that bothered me is not considering the impact an older child would have on their daughters. It's one thing to adopt an older child if you are already a child-less couple or your children are much older and out of the house. It's another thing to bring in an older child with their problems into a family with two young, impressionable daughters. What was Beth thinking in suggesting that? I get she wants to find a solution that makes Randall happy but you have to put your own daughters first!
Exactly what I was thinking. If I had two young children - girls or boys - I wouldn't bring an older child into the family who might possibly have issues. You just never know what the older child might wind up doing to the younger ones. And I say this regardless of race or gender, before anyone sounds the outrage alarm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get the haters here. Given all the crap on TV, this show is really good.
Milo Ventimiglia deserves an Emmy from last night's show.
The Emmy went to Sterling K. Brown.
Yes, the Emmy given out this year went to Sterling K. Brown for his work on last season. I suggested that Ventimiglia get an Emmy next year for his work in last night's episode.
Nice idea but there’s no category for a single episode for a drama lead actor.
To the contrary, when an actor attempts to win an Emmy, he submits - wait for it - one episode. There's no category for the entire season for a drama lead actor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone explain to me how Jack dies in a house fire and yet no one else looks like they were in the fire? I mean look at Rebecca - nothing wrong with her clothes or even her makeup but she supposedly just got back from the hospital after a house fire? I'm wondering if Jack was home alone.
Yes - obviously he was home alone and everyone else was out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get the haters here. Given all the crap on TV, this show is really good.
Milo Ventimiglia deserves an Emmy from last night's show.
The Emmy went to Sterling K. Brown.
Yes, the Emmy given out this year went to Sterling K. Brown for his work on last season. I suggested that Ventimiglia get an Emmy next year for his work in last night's episode.
Nice idea but there’s no category for a single episode for a drama lead actor.
Anonymous wrote:I think Jack didn't die in the house, not sure why but I think he may have die in the AA meeting house? Don't ask me why!
Anonymous wrote:Kate is so bitter and annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is my theory. I think Kate started the fire (accidentally) maybe when no one else was home, and called her dad, he rushed home and died in a car accident on the way. Maybe he was at a bar drinking. I don't think he died in the fire because his belongings were too pristine. But I do think he died that day.
but how did she call him? Pretty sure there were no cell phones around when he died.
NP. If the kids are 17, it's about 1997. I had a cellphone then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He passed out drunk with a cigarette in his mouth? Or a burner on? Or forgot to put the fire screen up?
Can't be that last one. We've already been through that. Brutal.
Uh, when? I don't remember that.
Anonymous wrote:Someone explain to me how Jack dies in a house fire and yet no one else looks like they were in the fire? I mean look at Rebecca - nothing wrong with her clothes or even her makeup but she supposedly just got back from the hospital after a house fire? I'm wondering if Jack was home alone.
Anonymous wrote:I had PTSD from Manchester by the Sea with the house fire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that bothered me is not considering the impact an older child would have on their daughters. It's one thing to adopt an older child if you are already a child-less couple or your children are much older and out of the house. It's another thing to bring in an older child with their problems into a family with two young, impressionable daughters. What was Beth thinking in suggesting that? I get she wants to find a solution that makes Randall happy but you have to put your own daughters first!
They had Kevin in their basement for a year, isn't that practice enough?![]()
Seriously, I think that after having William and Kevin disrupt their lives, the girls are probably resilient but they might show some conflict in upcoming episodes if it does happen. The actors playing the girls are now regulars so expect to see them more this season.
It's more than whether or not the kids are resilient. It's a matter of keeping your kids safe.
Anonymous wrote:Toby is a closeted abuser. He appears to adore Kate, but he only wants Kate to himself. There is something off about him. He is very controlling and jealous of Kate's relationship with her family. I definitely think the writers could go deep into his anger issues and his past. I envision a scene with Kevin beating the crap out of him after emotionally abusing Kate. I want Toby to be viciously killed. I dislike his character the most.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that bothered me is not considering the impact an older child would have on their daughters. It's one thing to adopt an older child if you are already a child-less couple or your children are much older and out of the house. It's another thing to bring in an older child with their problems into a family with two young, impressionable daughters. What was Beth thinking in suggesting that? I get she wants to find a solution that makes Randall happy but you have to put your own daughters first!