Anonymous wrote:I check other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who are unhappy with present admissions criteria at top colleges: would you advocate for a change to a process that looks solely at test scores and grades/class rank? Are you asking schools to drop the practice of considering outside activities, essays, recommendations, interviews?
I'd like to hear suggestions to change the policies to be more acceptable to those who find present practices unacceptable.
Look at all the above but drop comparing candidates within racial and legacy.
Thanks for responding. How would we check to know it's being done in the preferred way?
Interested in suggestions from others, also.
Give applicants IDs rather than having their names on them. Names give it away. Of course, the interview would give it all away, but most public colleges don't do interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine being half Jewish, half Asian. Hated by bigots everywhere.
this is the future super-class.
zuck's kid
amy chua's daughters.
han-chinese + ashkenazi jew - IQ minimum is like 130.
in 50 years, this group will be running everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who are unhappy with present admissions criteria at top colleges: would you advocate for a change to a process that looks solely at test scores and grades/class rank? Are you asking schools to drop the practice of considering outside activities, essays, recommendations, interviews?
I'd like to hear suggestions to change the policies to be more acceptable to those who find present practices unacceptable.
Look at all the above but drop comparing candidates within racial and legacy.
Thanks for responding. How would we check to know it's being done in the preferred way?
Interested in suggestions from others, also.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet another reason why it's important to do a holistic approach than just look at scores. Many of the scores are inflated.
"Those enrolled in private and suburban public high schools are being awarded higher grades—critical in the competition for college admission—than their urban public school counterparts with no less talent or potential, new research shows. . . . These findings are troubling, but not surprising, said Richard Weissbourd, the director of the Human Development and Psychology program at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. 'To be attractive to parents,” private schools in particular, Weissbourd said, “need to be able to tout how many of their students went to selective colleges. So they’re incentivized to give better grades.' The same concern about college admission drives parents of students in suburban schools to pressure principals and teachers, he said. 'It becomes very high maintenance for schools to deal with aggressive parents. So that can also push grades up.'"
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/08/suburban-grade-inflation/536595/
Those who benefit the most from the above findings are white students since they make up most of the private school student populations. In addition, white parents in suburban public schools are the ones pressuring teachers for higher grades not other groups. So white students benefit most from the "grade inflation" and Asian students have to show even higher gpas compared to white students.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine being half Jewish, half Asian. Hated by bigots everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine being half Jewish, half Asian. Hated by bigots everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine being half Jewish, half Asian. Hated by bigots everywhere.