Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is that all in one class?
15% of the kids went to schools on that list. At most schools it's maybe 2% which means that a TJHSST student is 7 times as likely to matriculate to one of those schools.
Of course, that is to be expected of a magnet school. I want to see the household income of the 15% from TJ and 2% from base schools. If those 15% of TJ students are considerably poorer than the base school students, then I could be convinced that TJ teachers are truly working miracles by effectively teaching the hardest subgroup of students.
Anonymous wrote:Is that all in one class?
15% of the kids went to schools on that list. At most schools it's maybe 2% which means that a TJHSST student is 7 times as likely to matriculate to one of those schools.
Anonymous wrote:Is that all in one class?
15% of the kids went to schools on that list. At most schools it's maybe 2% which means that a TJHSST student is 7 times as likely to matriculate to one of those schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone have matriculation info on Chantilly HS or Fairfax HS? DD is a rising freshman at TJ and one concern we have is that her chances at getting into a really good college might be lower from TJ.
Don't know about Chantilly, but a friend whose child just graduated from TJ said it was pretty hard to watch the kids' peers from Edison get into better schools with far less work during the HS years. Half of the kids at TJ are in "the bottom half". Her child got into VT, so he's fine, but there was a lot of stress along the way (and a lot of kids with anxiety and executive functioning issues even though they are super smart on the tests). I can imagine it would be really hard to see friends skating off to _______ school, knowing that they had a much easier experience. I guess the last laugh will be that friend's kid will probably skate through VT, while the peers will have to work a little harder in college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol there aint no denying for elite schools TJ does no better than your average upper SES school
lolz lolz lolz
Keep telling your self that while TJ kids continue with the best college admissions results in the country.
That's because of the quality of the students, not the high school itself. If those kids had all stayed at their base schools and you posted admission information for them, the results would probably be just as good if not better.
Would you say the same thing to a smart STEM kid who got into Caltech to go to GMU instead of Caltech since you may have a higher chance of getting into a better grad school from GMU with likely higher gpa?
Number of TJ grads going to Caltech: 1
Misleading.
26 applied
4 admitted (15% admit rate from TJ vs 9% overall admit rate).
Vs the other top STEM schools (MIT, CMU, Berkeley, GT, UCIC), Cal Tech has a lot less TJ interest, and a fraction of the TJ applicants.
For example, Berkeley. Also a UC. Only one position different in engineering rankings. 97 applied, 34 admitted, 11 attending.
No idea what the difference is.
Caltech is not a UC.
Also, it's UIUC NOT UCIC or UICU. You should take your med before posting anything further. Remember, it's UIUC.
You know that someone has lost the argument (bigly) when the best they can do is insult the PP for transposing letters. It's like the grammar police. But with even less substance.![]()