Heed your own advice.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^huh? De Vos is secretary of education. she's already started to screw up higher ed with her student loan policies. your NEA blaming isn't going to fly here.
No, that falls under the Assistant Secretary of Post-secondary Education. There is no confirmed Trump person in that position now. In fact, there is only an Obama acting in that office. Nothing is happening. Nothing would ever happen before an Assistant Secretary is confirmed. You are listening to NEA fake news. Please take it to politics.
Anonymous wrote:I am writing as the parent of two college grads (one with a graduate degree) who were two completely different kinds of students. Each is successfully "launched" -- self-supporting in a job that he/she enjoys overall.
This angst in the D.C. area is very overblown (my kids were in a different location for the first half of their childhood; here for the second).
Fact (and I've read all the books!): Experts list 100 to 200 colleges as offering top-notch educations for the best students. My DD went to one of those; my DS went to an excellent, supportive liberal arts college that was perfect for him.
Fact: It's not really a "screwed-up system" -- it's a screwed up D.C.-area way of looking at things. Admittedly, it is difficult not to get caught up in the competition, but remember -- come September if your DD or DS is enrolled in college, it won't matter any more where he did or did not get in (that is, if he or she doesn't have hysterical parents and friends).
Fact: Yes, tutoring and other things may help a bit, but only in limited circumstances. Colleges and universities understand the different schools and geographic areas that high school students are applying from. For example, my DD had very strong grades in tough classes, but her PSAT scores weren't great, so she enrolled in an SAT prep class, and that did help. But, if the classes she chose and the grades in those classes hadn't been very strong, that would have helped very little.
By the way, I visited Carleton and Macalester with my DD -- fantastic schools! It was snowing in October; she ended up applying early somewhere else. If I remember correctly, Macalester is very strong with need-based aid. Really, you could get a wonderful education at so many places such as the Honors programs at many state universities (just as an example). You would find many other extremely bright students who could not afford to go anywhere else there.
Most of all, I feel bad for the students who are put under such pressure. A good work ethic and resilience will carry you far, wherever you attend college. I just tried to shield my kids as best I could from the whole thing when they were seniors in high school. They also were allowed to (gasp!) do social things and just enjoy themselves sometimes (of course, there is a lot of growth and maturation that goes on during the high school years in many ways -- not just cognitively).
Anonymous wrote:^^huh? De Vos is secretary of education. she's already started to screw up higher ed with her student loan policies. your NEA blaming isn't going to fly here.
+1Anonymous wrote:^^huh? De Vos is secretary of education. she's already started to screw up higher ed with her student loan policies. your NEA blaming isn't going to fly here.
Anonymous wrote:I understand where OP is coming from. I am totally disillusioned with all of this maneuvering to get to the head of the line for the best colleges.
People are gaming the system with Prep that helps kids score higher on the SAT. They are studying to take a test better and better. So what does the SAT even mean? How well you can cram for a test, it's not a true measure anymore.
Schools hand out A's like water under the pressure of helicopter parents. A 4.0 means your kid is average now. So now kids have to take AP to get into colleges.
Wealthy people pay for tutors for the kids to spoon feed the course work to them. Do the improved grades mean they are smarter, more dedicated or just pampered students?
Lord help the kids that fall behind early on because they go to a lesser school. The road is too long and steep to catch up in this educational rat race.
I am sick of it. This uneven playing field isn't serving any of these kids (rich or poor) well. College is going to weed out a lot of these kids, but it probably won't be their fault at all.
Now we have DeVoss. That's the last nail in the coffin.
Cut it out. DeVos has nothing to do with higher ed. That falls under the still-to-be confirmed Assistant Secretary of Post-Secondary education. DeVos hasn't done all the horrible things the NEA said she would do. And she hasn't touched higher ED. Educate yourself before posting.
None of you have any idea what you are talking about
Here are the two questions I need to know
1. Is the kid Asian
2. Is the kid in the top 10% of the graduating class
If he/she is Asian or not in the top 10% of the graduating class he/she will not get into a great school. Even if non-Asian and top 10% of class it's still completely random to get into a great school
Those are the facts.
Now he/she will definitely get into UMD and be completely happy. I would send my kid there....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems that excellent GPA and SAT is no longer enough. EC activities have to be supplemented with trips to teach underprivileged children in 3rd world countries. And you have to be able to afford the said trips to foreign countries. You have to know people to get internships and recommendations. All this in HS.
I just feel that I have failed my kids because this is just so overwhelming.
I'm the person whose kid needs between 3-5 classes before they could technically take the MCATS, whose kid was rejected from alma maters, and who is Yale Medical School legacy and whose kid can't get into a college with good stats:
This is my DC's mountain. DC, who is affluent, tutored friends who are more affluent, who got into fantastic schools. DC went throughout school with great kids, albeit nowhere near the same academic level, who are going to top notch schools.
You didn't fail your kid: the admissions process screwed our kids. It can't continue. In my old life I used to get federal funding for one of the schools - and others - my DC was rejected from. I was in love with one university because of the personal pride I took in the future renewal of the area and the coalition I was part of. Did I tell the admissions people this? No.
So, my advice is to use every connection you have to make the decision easy for the admissions team. My DC heard her entire life how I worked from the age of 7 and she wanted to it by herself. My family was 30 years from shirt sleeves (me) to shirt sleeves (daughter). Not the "American Dream."
So where is she actually going to go to school? Are you complaining just because she didn't get into Yale? Nobody has a right to go to Yale. Something must have been off with her application or her choices of schools to apply to, if her peers all go into better schools and she literally got in nowhere.
She didn't apply to Yale and only applied to one reach. Something must have been majorly off with her application - because it couldn't be related to NCED stats - and something *must* be off with my judgment for expecting a kid with stats within reach to get into a top 75% college.