Anonymous wrote:This just seems like a massive deflection to take our minds off the Sessions-Russian Ambassador meetings. It seems desperate and semi-delusional. Maybe Trump's getting anxious with the prospect that he may have someone less subservient than Sessions at the helm of the investigation.
And shame on Ivanka and Jared. Fridays, before they start sabbath, they should remove all gadgets with Twitter access from Trump's small hands.
Anonymous wrote:Word is, Trump went on a major rampage and yelling fit in the White House today, was going to take Priebus and Bannon to Florida this weekend but took off for Florida and left them behind.
Trump is seriously melting down over this.
Anonymous wrote:Sessions had a career as an attorney and as such should know perfectly well what the parameters of perjury are, and how to ask and answer questions. "Sloppy and forgetful" then either mean he's ACTUALLY sloppy and forgetful (and thus not fit to serve) OR he's willfully and intentionally lying. There isn't really much of another answer. And either way he should not just recuse himself, but actually step down.
Actually, if you read or listen to the whole exchange, he did exactly what lawyers are told to do. He answered the question. Even Vanity Fair said this.
It is absolutely not perjury. He answered the question that was asked.
And, if he is "forgetful" then so is McCaskill and Pelosi.
Sessions had a career as an attorney and as such should know perfectly well what the parameters of perjury are, and how to ask and answer questions. "Sloppy and forgetful" then either mean he's ACTUALLY sloppy and forgetful (and thus not fit to serve) OR he's willfully and intentionally lying. There isn't really much of another answer. And either way he should not just recuse himself, but actually step down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sessions' banana-peel slip was also an indication there's something going on. So easy to say he'd met with the ambassador in his role as senator, but he had reason to pretend he hadn't.
Nope. Go listen to full exchange with Franken starting with CNN report.
Sessions is an honest man. You don't have to like him, but he is honest.
You believe he is being honest when he says he "can't remember" what he talked about with the ambassador just six months ago? Please. if that's the case he needs a full neurological workup.
Early signs of dementia maybe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump was in a meeting with Obama and the intelligence chiefs to learn what they had on his connections to Russia back in the early part of January. Remember?
That intelligence didn't just pop up out of the blue, it had been in collection for months. It's not news right now to Trump or anyone else that his communications had been under surveillance going back to at least summer of 2016.
My theory is that he's been playing beat the clock ever since that January meeting, doing everything he can to get ahead of the facts that will certainly come out by
1) discrediting the intelligence and anyone else who knows what's in it (e.g., Obama)
2) discrediting the media so no one will believe them when they report said facts,
3) shore up his public support with a barrage of controversial actions that piss off the left.
This last tactic is the one over which he has the most control and the most confidence. The more outraged the left becomes, the more his supporters dig in and fight back. It's a witch hunt! You're mad because you lost! You're not letting him do his job! You're being disrespectful!
This latest volley is the most desperate of all. If he were innocent, it really wouldn't be so difficult.
This exactly.
+2
+3
Of course his supporters will lap this up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Exactly, just like he's staying in Washington because of Sasha. Lol.
I mean, obviously the more rational explanation is that a former POTUS is staying in DC in order to more easily plan his eventual coup.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Exactly, just like he's staying in Washington because of Sasha. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/10407282/Barack-Obama-approved-tapping-Angela-Merkels-phone-3-years-ago.html
By Philip Sherwell, New York and Louise Barnett in Berlin
6:18PM GMT 27 Oct 2013
President Barack Obama was told about monitoring of German Chancellor in 2010 and allowed it to continue, says German newspaper
President Barack Obama was dragged into the trans-Atlantic spying row after it was claimed he personally authorised the monitoring of Angela Merkel’s phone three years ago.
The president allegedly allowed US intelligence to listen to calls from the German Chancellor’s mobile phone after he was briefed on the operation by Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency (NSA), in 2010.
Again. The FBI was listening to Merkel, not Obama.
The delusion that Obama is never involved with the workings of the government when he was the Chief Executive is childish and moronic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sessions' banana-peel slip was also an indication there's something going on. So easy to say he'd met with the ambassador in his role as senator, but he had reason to pretend he hadn't.
Nope. Go listen to full exchange with Franken starting with CNN report.
Sessions is an honest man. You don't have to like him, but he is honest.
You believe he is being honest when he says he "can't remember" what he talked about with the ambassador just six months ago? Please. if that's the case he needs a full neurological workup.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump was in a meeting with Obama and the intelligence chiefs to learn what they had on his connections to Russia back in the early part of January. Remember?
That intelligence didn't just pop up out of the blue, it had been in collection for months. It's not news right now to Trump or anyone else that his communications had been under surveillance going back to at least summer of 2016.
My theory is that he's been playing beat the clock ever since that January meeting, doing everything he can to get ahead of the facts that will certainly come out by
1) discrediting the intelligence and anyone else who knows what's in it (e.g., Obama)
2) discrediting the media so no one will believe them when they report said facts,
3) shore up his public support with a barrage of controversial actions that piss off the left.
This last tactic is the one over which he has the most control and the most confidence. The more outraged the left becomes, the more his supporters dig in and fight back. It's a witch hunt! You're mad because you lost! You're not letting him do his job! You're being disrespectful!
This latest volley is the most desperate of all. If he were innocent, it really wouldn't be so difficult.
This exactly.
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, this is not how an American President should act.
Hahahaha...we've fallen so far from that standard, it's not even worth discussing anymore.
#ThanksPeeOTUS