Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC firms could just relocate to Md. and Virginia. Would you prefer that? I would. Let DC be a museum, Georgetown and a ghetto.
That's basically what it is now, after 5.
You are truly a world class idiot.
+1. If DC firms wanted to be in VA or MD, they would already be there. Yes, DC is a ghetto - that's why my property value is increasing so fast and people send letters to ask us to sell our house. The ghetto really sucks!
Jealous?
So then DC can raise taxes on its businesses to 99%? No businesses will consequently leave, according to your stellar logic, right?
Next time try to put a little effort into your posts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC firms could just relocate to Md. and Virginia. Would you prefer that? I would. Let DC be a museum, Georgetown and a ghetto.
That's basically what it is now, after 5.
You are truly a world class idiot.
+1. If DC firms wanted to be in VA or MD, they would already be there. Yes, DC is a ghetto - that's why my property value is increasing so fast and people send letters to ask us to sell our house. The ghetto really sucks!
Jealous?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/12/12/d-c-council-members-flush-away-valuable-time/?utm_term=.c53da601e1b0
I like baby changing tables but Colbert King has a point, our Council has been up to so much silly nonsense of late.
It would be one thing if announcements like this were on top of legislation to address unemployment, transit woes, education quality, good food for school children, crime, sanitation, parking
But resounding crickets on that kind of stuff. We can all just fend for ourselves I guess.
Parking? That's now a priority? Seriously?
Actually, it is. Livability is important to those of us who live here, and we define it different ways. I've had friends in tears crying after their umpteenth ticket. The city council wants everyone peddling bikes, walking or riding transport and often purposefully limits parking on new construction. At the same time, they seem oblivious to metro woes. Yes - for those of us who live here parking is a quality of life issue. I'm personally glad that on my block (I dont drive) my neighbors dont have to circle the block 50 times as we are a rare street with parking. Yes, the Council should be working on bread and butter issues for us. Not just on trendy issues that basically put all D.C. residents on the tip of the spear of national liberal pet projects.
I turned a job down because it did not come with parking. I will not rely on Metro, and I am not riding my bike in the cold.
If you turned down a job that did not come with parking, you are an administrative assistant. That is the dumbest shit I've ever heard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC firms could just relocate to Md. and Virginia. Would you prefer that? I would. Let DC be a museum, Georgetown and a ghetto.
That's basically what it is now, after 5.
You are truly a world class idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/12/12/d-c-council-members-flush-away-valuable-time/?utm_term=.c53da601e1b0
I like baby changing tables but Colbert King has a point, our Council has been up to so much silly nonsense of late.
It would be one thing if announcements like this were on top of legislation to address unemployment, transit woes, education quality, good food for school children, crime, sanitation, parking
But resounding crickets on that kind of stuff. We can all just fend for ourselves I guess.
Parking? That's now a priority? Seriously?
Actually, it is. Livability is important to those of us who live here, and we define it different ways. I've had friends in tears crying after their umpteenth ticket. The city council wants everyone peddling bikes, walking or riding transport and often purposefully limits parking on new construction. At the same time, they seem oblivious to metro woes. Yes - for those of us who live here parking is a quality of life issue. I'm personally glad that on my block (I dont drive) my neighbors dont have to circle the block 50 times as we are a rare street with parking. Yes, the Council should be working on bread and butter issues for us. Not just on trendy issues that basically put all D.C. residents on the tip of the spear of national liberal pet projects.
I turned a job down because it did not come with parking. I will not rely on Metro, and I am not riding my bike in the cold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC firms could just relocate to Md. and Virginia. Would you prefer that? I would. Let DC be a museum, Georgetown and a ghetto.
This is a true disincentive for nonprofits and even trade associations to locate over in Arlington rather than DC, with the resulting increased payroll tax on employers. Law firms may stay, but at the margins, this really increases costs for businesses and organizations, and those who can, may move. It would be one thing if DC offered near the same benefits as neighboring jurisdictions, but in this case DC is just pricing itself out of the market.
It will also likely increase discriminatory hiring practices against women of child-bearing age.
THis bill
Is not a maternity leave bill. It's a family medical
Leave bill. Men can use it to take care of their children or grandparents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/12/12/d-c-council-members-flush-away-valuable-time/?utm_term=.c53da601e1b0
I like baby changing tables but Colbert King has a point, our Council has been up to so much silly nonsense of late.
It would be one thing if announcements like this were on top of legislation to address unemployment, transit woes, education quality, good food for school children, crime, sanitation, parking
But resounding crickets on that kind of stuff. We can all just fend for ourselves I guess.
Parking? That's now a priority? Seriously?
Actually, it is. Livability is important to those of us who live here, and we define it different ways. I've had friends in tears crying after their umpteenth ticket. The city council wants everyone peddling bikes, walking or riding transport and often purposefully limits parking on new construction. At the same time, they seem oblivious to metro woes. Yes - for those of us who live here parking is a quality of life issue. I'm personally glad that on my block (I dont drive) my neighbors dont have to circle the block 50 times as we are a rare street with parking. Yes, the Council should be working on bread and butter issues for us. Not just on trendy issues that basically put all D.C. residents on the tip of the spear of national liberal pet projects.
I turned a job down because it did not come with parking. I will not rely on Metro, and I am not riding my bike in the cold.
You people need to live in the exurbs, where parking is free and plentiful, or for Congress. Pay for a private space or park legally. Consider a car sharing service if that's too much for those with an absurd sense of entitlement.
I wonder if the same backlash against constant liberal critique will filter down to local DC politics at some point. If we all voted Republican or Independent on the next ballot for Council, at most we would shift it from extreme liberal to moderate left. Which I suspect is what many of us on DC are. The reasonable people would like some representation too City Council! Its really time to vote some of these folks out.
I don't disagree. the problem is that lefty left to the left democrats run as independents, aka Grosso
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/12/12/d-c-council-members-flush-away-valuable-time/?utm_term=.c53da601e1b0
I like baby changing tables but Colbert King has a point, our Council has been up to so much silly nonsense of late.
It would be one thing if announcements like this were on top of legislation to address unemployment, transit woes, education quality, good food for school children, crime, sanitation, parking
But resounding crickets on that kind of stuff. We can all just fend for ourselves I guess.
Parking? That's now a priority? Seriously?
Actually, it is. Livability is important to those of us who live here, and we define it different ways. I've had friends in tears crying after their umpteenth ticket. The city council wants everyone peddling bikes, walking or riding transport and often purposefully limits parking on new construction. At the same time, they seem oblivious to metro woes. Yes - for those of us who live here parking is a quality of life issue. I'm personally glad that on my block (I dont drive) my neighbors dont have to circle the block 50 times as we are a rare street with parking. Yes, the Council should be working on bread and butter issues for us. Not just on trendy issues that basically put all D.C. residents on the tip of the spear of national liberal pet projects.
I turned a job down because it did not come with parking. I will not rely on Metro, and I am not riding my bike in the cold.
You people need to live in the exurbs, where parking is free and plentiful, or for Congress. Pay for a private space or park legally. Consider a car sharing service if that's too much for those with an absurd sense of entitlement.
I wonder if the same backlash against constant liberal critique will filter down to local DC politics at some point. If we all voted Republican or Independent on the next ballot for Council, at most we would shift it from extreme liberal to moderate left. Which I suspect is what many of us on DC are. The reasonable people would like some representation too City Council! Its really time to vote some of these folks out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/12/12/d-c-council-members-flush-away-valuable-time/?utm_term=.c53da601e1b0
I like baby changing tables but Colbert King has a point, our Council has been up to so much silly nonsense of late.
It would be one thing if announcements like this were on top of legislation to address unemployment, transit woes, education quality, good food for school children, crime, sanitation, parking
But resounding crickets on that kind of stuff. We can all just fend for ourselves I guess.
Parking? That's now a priority? Seriously?
Actually, it is. Livability is important to those of us who live here, and we define it different ways. I've had friends in tears crying after their umpteenth ticket. The city council wants everyone peddling bikes, walking or riding transport and often purposefully limits parking on new construction. At the same time, they seem oblivious to metro woes. Yes - for those of us who live here parking is a quality of life issue. I'm personally glad that on my block (I dont drive) my neighbors dont have to circle the block 50 times as we are a rare street with parking. Yes, the Council should be working on bread and butter issues for us. Not just on trendy issues that basically put all D.C. residents on the tip of the spear of national liberal pet projects.
I turned a job down because it did not come with parking. I will not rely on Metro, and I am not riding my bike in the cold.
You people need to live in the exurbs, where parking is free and plentiful, or for Congress. Pay for a private space or park legally. Consider a car sharing service if that's too much for those with an absurd sense of entitlement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC firms could just relocate to Md. and Virginia. Would you prefer that? I would. Let DC be a museum, Georgetown and a ghetto.
This is a true disincentive for nonprofits and even trade associations to locate over in Arlington rather than DC, with the resulting increased payroll tax on employers. Law firms may stay, but at the margins, this really increases costs for businesses and organizations, and those who can, may move. It would be one thing if DC offered near the same benefits as neighboring jurisdictions, but in this case DC is just pricing itself out of the market.
It will also likely increase discriminatory hiring practices against women of child-bearing age.