Anonymous wrote:Our school PTA decided to put ALL the money it raises (1/3 million dollars!!!) to a stupid playground and I'm not going to raise money for that when my 5th grader didn't even get a math book or a real science curriculum. I'm involved in my child's class but the ES PTA does not care about my child. We need a separate PTA for MS -- then I would donate many hours.
Anonymous wrote:I am involved now but considering quitting- the president wants us to just run errands for her and such, she does not listen to any ideas really. And there is not much influence on school matters and not much money to really change anything. I don't want pizza parties, I want an aide hired for my classroom. But that just won't happen.
However I am on the school board as well as a parent rep and it is much more rewarding. And less time consuming.
So next year I will donate, volunteer in class, and serve on the school board.
Anonymous wrote:Our school PTA decided to put ALL the money it raises (1/3 million dollars!!!) to a stupid playground and I'm not going to raise money for that when my 5th grader didn't even get a math book or a real science curriculum. I'm involved in my child's class but the ES PTA does not care about my child. We need a separate PTA for MS -- then I would donate many hours.
Anonymous wrote:Ex PTA president here. I think at some point board members should give up. Let there be no PTA and then you will see the a longer lines of concerned parents, mind you the same ones who refused to joined complaining about there being no PTA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A NPR story on the radio featuring this article:
http://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/2014/12/16/54797/pasadena-schools-experiment-with-charlas-to-help-students-by-coaching-their-parents/
"“We found that most forms of parental involvement yield no benefit to children’s test scores or grades regardless of their racial or ethnic background or socioeconomic status.”
Robinson found traditional activities like attending PTA meetings didn’t help.
But he said a few things can make a difference.
“The list of what consistently works is pretty short. That would be expecting your child to go to college, regularly discussing activities that your child engages in at school and requesting a particular teacher for your child,” he said."
This is not surprising. Our school has a PTA funded program that doesn't appear to be audited or measured for performance in any way. Everyone loves to talk about our unique "XXXX" program but nobody can answer basics questions about how the program is measured for effectiveness and impact or why the PTA continues to fund it year after year. So we will keep paying $00 because everybody thinks the program is so great and some of us are wondering why we don't consider other programs.
I think you and other posters are confused about the study cited in the NPR study.
There are two different propositions here:
1) the attendance of low-income parents at PTA meetings does not improve the test scores of the children of those parents. Other involvements are more effective for engaging these parents, for example the "charlas" discussed in the article.
2) PTA-funded programming is ineffective at raising the test scores of children or meaningfully contribuing to their education.
The study established (1). It didn't say anything about (2), and we know that (2) is false because for example, PTAs can fund these types of charlas and also tutoring, enrichment, classroom aides, and many things that help students.
If the PTA showed the numbed of parent hours invested, the amount of money raised, the costs for fundraisers, the profits, the decision-making process for how funds are spent, and where
the money goes....that would help encourage participation. Rather than guilt-tripping parents, or bullying them as labeling them as freeloaders....how about each PTA make a persuasive case such as a start-up would. Or even BBB transparency standards. http://www.bbb.org/council/news-events/news-releases/20131/09/meeting-bbb-charity-standards-associated-with-greater-fundraising-results/
You want shareholders without demonstrating what the shareholders are getting for the investment.