Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I shit you not. I live in Ashburn and was at happy hour a few weeks ago and met a few millennials who living in Ashburn near their high paying jobs and own condos in DC for the weekend. Not just one millennial, but a group of them all had this arrangement.
I will not let the oracles, experts, and clairvoyanto carry on with their Internet drivel.
That's bananas. What are their jobs?!? I'm guessing intel and cyber security contractors. I definitely have not heard of this trend!
Everything out here is IT. I'd guess sales, don't know though. I was like whhaaaaa? My DH works for an IT company that has blown up and has made a fortune on the RSUs so maybe similar? Maybe AWS? Those guys are living the absolute dream.
Perfectly reasonable explanation. And AWS has a shit-ton of job openings in Herndon right now for highly paid positions. I bet the incentives are ridiculous given talent shortage in this area of the country (good luck prying people from NYC, LA, or SF to....Herndon)
https://www.amazon.jobs/en/locations/herndon-area-va?base_query=&job_count=10&result_limit=10&sort=relevant&location%5B%5D=herndon-area-va&cache
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh they will, just not yet. Still too young.
This - obviously - once they stop taking pictures of their food, have a kid and find it harder to go to Iceland for the weekend, they will want what everyone wants. Space and easy access (by car) to the things they need. Walking to meet friends for sushi will be replace by putting the sleeping baby in the car seat and finding a drive through Starbucks.
Matter of time. I am perfectly happy in my house for the next 20 years - I can wait.
36 year old Millennial here. I don't want your McMansion. Not eve a little. I don't want poor design, crap materials, a probable long commute, suburbs with amenities only accessible by driving, or the more conservative politics. I'd like more space for my three (already existing) kids, but I'm not buying a trailer on steroids to satisfy that desire, especially when I'm 56.
Also, I cook 90% of our meals at home. I've taken zero pictures of them.
This. Another millennial. [b]I don't want to spend hours a week in my car. It's already challenging to juggle kids and a job without sitting in traffic for two hours a day. It's also hard to stay in shape and sitting in an office and then a car doesn't help. I couldn't care less about walking to get sushi. I don't want a lengthy commute and many others don't as well.
This. Almost millennial here (37). No interest in a long, sedentary commute, a lack of diversity, and the conservative politics that characterized our neighborhood when we briefly lived further out. We ended up buying a SFH in upper NW, which also allowed us more job options--we can have comfortable reverse commutes to MD, or a shorter commute downtown, where I now work. Lots of older millennial families starting to move to our current neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be those who opt to be closer in and willing to live in smaller homes. There will also always be those who opt to move out for bigger homes. So there are going to be many millennials who choose to have smaller families and stay closer in. But there are also going to be many millennials who choose to have more than one child who opt for larger homes with more yard space, more rooms and more square footage.
That said, the average square footage of homes is still trending upwards, so it looks as if the desire for more house is still outweighing other factors.
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/06/02/u-s-houses-are-still-getting-bigger/
See the graph in the article above. The only significant drop in average sf house size since 1982 was 2007-2008 during the big housing recession where many buyers had to opt for smaller because that's what they could afford.
So, even if some millennials are opting not to get bigger houses, many of those with 2+ children still are buying larger houses.
Isn't it strange that everyone is acting as if millennials will have as many children as previous generations, both is the sense that as many of them will have children and for those that do, that family size will stay consistent? Not only does early data suggests that is not true, this is something that changes from generation to generation. Family sizes have been getting smaller and smaller for a while now. This is not some passing trend millennials started. Using the Baby Boomers and Gen-X as some sort of standard that's existed since time immemorial is ridiculous. Your point about it being a diverse group and people making different choices is well taken, but you're almost undermining your own point with the rest of your post. If millennials who have large families are the main ones who will keep up demand for McMansions in the suburbs, it seems reasonable to think that demand will fall.
Anonymous wrote:Just turned 31 and have two babies. We bought a historic home with a decent commute in the close in burbs. McMansions are gross. Our next house will be another historic home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I shit you not. I live in Ashburn and was at happy hour a few weeks ago and met a few millennials who living in Ashburn near their high paying jobs and own condos in DC for the weekend. Not just one millennial, but a group of them all had this arrangement.
I will not let the oracles, experts, and clairvoyanto carry on with their Internet drivel.
That's bananas. What are their jobs?!? I'm guessing intel and cyber security contractors. I definitely have not heard of this trend!
Everything out here is IT. I'd guess sales, don't know though. I was like whhaaaaa? My DH works for an IT company that has blown up and has made a fortune on the RSUs so maybe similar? Maybe AWS? Those guys are living the absolute dream.
Anonymous wrote:I'm 34 and have one kid. No more kids for me (can't imagine paying for 2 daycare slots in DC). My little three person family has no need and no desire for a huge house. We make do with our 1 car and 1600 sq ft "shitshack" in a close-in, historic neighborhood with good public schools. DH and I bought this house in 2011, at the tail end of the recession, for less than $300K; now we have about $250K in equity. I think our situation is a lot better than people 5-10 years younger than us.
A lot of my friends have 1 or 2 kids and probably won't have more. I can't think of any that would ever buy a McMansion. We like being able to walk places. But maybe I'll eat my words in 10 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I shit you not. I live in Ashburn and was at happy hour a few weeks ago and met a few millennials who living in Ashburn near their high paying jobs and own condos in DC for the weekend. Not just one millennial, but a group of them all had this arrangement.
I will not let the oracles, experts, and clairvoyanto carry on with their Internet drivel.
That's bananas. What are their jobs?!? I'm guessing intel and cyber security contractors. I definitely have not heard of this trend!
Anonymous wrote:There will always be those who opt to be closer in and willing to live in smaller homes. There will also always be those who opt to move out for bigger homes. So there are going to be many millennials who choose to have smaller families and stay closer in. But there are also going to be many millennials who choose to have more than one child who opt for larger homes with more yard space, more rooms and more square footage.
That said, the average square footage of homes is still trending upwards, so it looks as if the desire for more house is still outweighing other factors.
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/06/02/u-s-houses-are-still-getting-bigger/
See the graph in the article above. The only significant drop in average sf house size since 1982 was 2007-2008 during the big housing recession where many buyers had to opt for smaller because that's what they could afford.
So, even if some millennials are opting not to get bigger houses, many of those with 2+ children still are buying larger houses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason they're not buying those is because they can't afford them.
You're so right! Eighty million people, and a singular reason explains everything! Wow, it's a good thing you showed up to this thread! I'm so much better off for your valuable insight.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason they're not buying those is because they can't afford them.