Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet UVA doesn't seem to feel that way. That's the issue.
Yes, I know (I'm the PP). It's a real problem that they aren't accepting so many qualified kids, simply because they're from NOVA.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that a college with student body mostly from one state is not necessarily a good thing. For one, perspective students may not be interested in attending a college where pretty much everyone comes from one particular state. So I'm ok with the current percentage of in state students at UVA. But I disagree with the school's practice of purposely limiting the number of NOVA students to make room for students from other parts of VA. I think all VA students should have to meet the same standards. A student from Va Beach does not add that much diversity to the school. At the end of the day, they are all VA students.
You can't spend your endowment, right? You can only use the interest?Anonymous wrote:As for the article citing the school being broke... UVA's endowment is over $7B. Was it so hard for the good delegate to find this out?
5% of their budget comes from taxes, but 66% of the students are from VA and the majority of those are from Fairfax.
So sick of paying taxes which support this school (and W&M) and having so few kids from NOVA accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^I'm not sure how I feel about admitting more in state students and less from out of state. To a certain degree, UVA is as good as it is and considered a top national university (and therefor the reason we want our kids to attend) because of the intense competition out of state students face for admission and the caliber of students they are.
Hell no, with the quality of students from NoVA and Richmond UVA could fill all slots with top-notch in-state students and did not have to resort to internationals with fake credentials, essays and SAT scores. NoVA kids face the same competition as OOS percentage-wise and can certainly hold their own wrt "caliber" compared to OOS. And before you throw the "diversity" argument at me, the VA candidates have plenty of it, again due to diverse population in NoVA, Richmond and Hampton Roads.
Yes, there may be weaker contingent coming from poorer/rural VA counties, but as a state flagship if behooves UVA to give back to the community and educate kids from less advantaged localities.
As for the article citing the school being broke... UVA's endowment is over $7B. Was it so hard for the good delegate to find this out?
My point is simply that I question whether in the long run UVA would be considered a top national university if 90% or more are from nova. I know there are plenty of qualified nova students who get rejected, including mine who had top grades and scores and worked his butt off in high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^I'm not sure how I feel about admitting more in state students and less from out of state. To a certain degree, UVA is as good as it is and considered a top national university (and therefor the reason we want our kids to attend) because of the intense competition out of state students face for admission and the caliber of students they are.
Hell no, with the quality of students from NoVA and Richmond UVA could fill all slots with top-notch in-state students and did not have to resort to internationals with fake credentials, essays and SAT scores. NoVA kids face the same competition as OOS percentage-wise and can certainly hold their own wrt "caliber" compared to OOS. And before you throw the "diversity" argument at me, the VA candidates have plenty of it, again due to diverse population in NoVA, Richmond and Hampton Roads.
Yes, there may be weaker contingent coming from poorer/rural VA counties, but as a state flagship if behooves UVA to give back to the community and educate kids from less advantaged localities.
As for the article citing the school being broke... UVA's endowment is over $7B. Was it so hard for the good delegate to find this out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^I'm not sure how I feel about admitting more in state students and less from out of state. To a certain degree, UVA is as good as it is and considered a top national university (and therefor the reason we want our kids to attend) because of the intense competition out of state students face for admission and the caliber of students they are.
Hell no, with the quality of students from NoVA and Richmond UVA could fill all slots with top-notch in-state students and did not have to resort to internationals with fake credentials, essays and SAT scores. NoVA kids face the same competition as OOS percentage-wise and can certainly hold their own wrt "caliber" compared to OOS. And before you throw the "diversity" argument at me, the VA candidates have plenty of it, again due to diverse population in NoVA, Richmond and Hampton Roads.
Yes, there may be weaker contingent coming from poorer/rural VA counties, but as a state flagship if behooves UVA to give back to the community and educate kids from less advantaged localities.
As for the article citing the school being broke... UVA's endowment is over $7B. Was it so hard for the good delegate to find this out?
Anonymous wrote:^I'm not sure how I feel about admitting more in state students and less from out of state. To a certain degree, UVA is as good as it is and considered a top national university (and therefor the reason we want our kids to attend) because of the intense competition out of state students face for admission and the caliber of students they are.
Anonymous wrote:Looking at the numbers (60% of those accepted go and 677 went from Fairfax), it seems that about a quarter of instate admissions are made to this one county?