Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have trouble imagining Trymp actually watching football except maybe the cheerleaders.
He once owned a team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^you sound nutty. The facts don't support your argument. Plus, you don't read. Perfect Trump supporter.
I know three people who worked for the Clintons in three different positions. They all said the same thing - that she was BRUTAL to the staff. I had read somewhere - although I can't find the article - that they each had separate homes. It's a marriage of convenience.
I voted for Bill. So I'm not a "perfect Trump supporter." However, I will not vote for Hillary either.
It's so interesting to see Libs tear apart any criticism of Queen Hillary. Thin-skinned fans, if you're so secure in your decision, then find evidence showing she's the "It Gal" for president. Right now, all I see is compelling evidence illustrating how much she lies and how she can't keep up with her lies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sunday nights are great nights for debates.
NFL games are now on Sunday, Monday and Thursday nights. College games are on Saturday nights. Doesn't leave many nights open for debates.
Umm, Tuesday and Wednesday??
Anonymous wrote:He has nothing to offer but hot air and the debates will surely bring that out. So, more smoke and mirrors. http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/30/media/donald-trump-presidential-debates-schedule/index.html
Anonymous wrote:I have trouble imagining Trymp actually watching football except maybe the cheerleaders.
Anonymous wrote:Once the dates are sorted out .... maybe even before the issue is resolved look for the Trump campaign to insist that Gary Johnson and Jill Stein to be included in the debate.
He will insist on it and refuse to participate without that happening and Johnson as well as Stein will support him for obvious reasons leaving Clinton out in the cold.
The advantages for Trump: he will appear a lot more inclusive than Clinton and will also have the debate time divided up between four candidates instead of two leaving him with less time to have to answer questions. Stein will draw from Clinton's support and Johnson will likely draw from both sides.
Yes, I know that there is a rule about needing 15% in the polls before being allowed to take part. Trump will insist that the rule is out of date and needs to be changed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^you sound nutty. The facts don't support your argument. Plus, you don't read. Perfect Trump supporter.
I know three people who worked for the Clintons in three different positions. They all said the same thing - that she was BRUTAL to the staff. I had read somewhere - although I can't find the article - that they each had separate homes. It's a marriage of convenience.
I voted for Bill. So I'm not a "perfect Trump supporter." However, I will not vote for Hillary either.
It's so interesting to see Libs tear apart any criticism of Queen Hillary. Thin-skinned fans, if you're so secure in your decision, then find evidence showing she's the "It Gal" for president. Right now, all I see is compelling evidence illustrating how much she lies and how she can't keep up with her lies.
A. I don't give a fuuuuuuuck if she and Bill live together, love one another, or simply use each other for political gain. Who gives a shit.
B. All politicians lie. It's a sunk cost. It's the game. Anything egregious or beyond the pale is one thing but Hillary doesn't lie anymore than the rest of them do. Even you lie. So give that line a rest.
+1000
C. She's been a senator, Secretary of State, AND has eight years in the White House as First Lady with experience in working across partisan lines to get legislation passed. You're right, she's totally not qualified for president.
D. She isn't perfect. Big fucking deal. No voting American is either. You don't get perfection in political candidates. You get a few choices and you pick the best one. If you refuse to vote for Hillary, you are saying (and yes, you are saying this, no matter how much you want to claim you're not) that the MOST qualified woman is still less preferable than the LEAST qualified man.
Anonymous wrote:On this one issue, I actually agree with Trump.
Not that the schedule was rigged but that it makes no sense for them to be scheduled on days that conflict with football games. Those who were involved in the scheduling know perfectly well that there are NFL games on Sunday and Monday. So they should have scheduled the debates on a different day of the week.
In the Democratic primaries there was a lot of rigging of dates and times for the debates. If the debates are that important both campaigns should want to have them on dates that would ensure maximum viewership.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^you sound nutty. The facts don't support your argument. Plus, you don't read. Perfect Trump supporter.
I know three people who worked for the Clintons in three different positions. They all said the same thing - that she was BRUTAL to the staff. I had read somewhere - although I can't find the article - that they each had separate homes. It's a marriage of convenience.
I voted for Bill. So I'm not a "perfect Trump supporter." However, I will not vote for Hillary either.
It's so interesting to see Libs tear apart any criticism of Queen Hillary. Thin-skinned fans, if you're so secure in your decision, then find evidence showing she's the "It Gal" for president. Right now, all I see is compelling evidence illustrating how much she lies and how she can't keep up with her lies.
Anonymous wrote:
Trump is asking to move the debate to Tuesday or Wednesday so we have bigger audience to see the debate. And he is the one who is afraid??
Ask Bernie which one is afraid of debate. Better yet ask poor Martin O'Malley, the guy who desperately needed a debate and couldn't get one.