Yo moron, most -Stan countries are majority Muslim and no one with this sort of past would be married into a powerful family, like ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had quite a nice body when she was younger, but I don't think someone who did soft-core porn shoots should be a First Lady. The Obamas have so much more class than the trashy Trump family.

What is soft-core porn about these pics? And I say that as someone who is very liberal, loves the Obamas, can't stand Trump, and will be voting for Hillary. I feel bad that these pics she took at 25 are being released to shame her.

Agree. I don't think she'd be a good First Lady because she stole a speech and lied about graduating. I don't care that she posed nude and think this is bad form.

I think a First Lady is expected to travel the globe and represent American values. She would meet many foreign leaders who would disdain dealing with a couple where the husband was married three times and the wife shot nude picts.

If we only had to have foreign relations with France and Slovenia, perhaps it wouldn't matter. But Donald is not capable of serving this country as President and Melania is not capable of representing us as First Lady. Drumpt and the wife he bought would be more fitting of one of the lesser -Stan countries.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eww. I think they do look porn-y. To me, though, it's not about the lewdness but about the fact that she sold her body to get money and success -- as she did in her marriage.

bc Hill and Bill don't have a marriage of convenience????

You have no direct knowledge of that--nothing about their relationship suggests that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?

They are a bunch of hypocrites. Snorting Cocaine is fine as long as it's done by Obama, dropping pants in front of a young intern in the White House is nothing, that' their wild billy. Feminism stops at Trump's beautiful wife.

NY Post published it but it's mostly liberals who are rejoice of this and used it as an attack on Melania's "fitness" to be the First Lady.

It's funny how you forgot to mention George Bush's past with cocaine.

Yeah, W. had an actual substance abuse problem. Obama experimented with drugs. And Bill Clinton is a letch--no question.

However, these photos are "artistic;" they're not celebrating the power of women. They were meant for ogling in a men's magazine. There is a lot of hypocrisy in how Michelle Obama is vilified for showing her arms too much and people saying that these pictures are okay b/c she was a model, it was a long time ago etc.

Yes, everyone has a past, but posing for nudie pix doesn't give off appropriate gravitas for someone who would be first lady. Most of the world thinks this way--and yeah it ain't fair but this is the perception.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i predict that Melania's life will be made hell by Donald Trump once he loses the election. He will blame her mistakes for his defeat. He will dump her and marry another woman.

This. It really is almost Shakespearean--If Shakespeare had a written a lead character with a limited vocabulary.

I'd like to see Trump in Macbeth. It's written for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?

They are a bunch of hypocrites. Snorting Cocaine is fine as long as it's done by Obama, dropping pants in front of a young intern in the White House is nothing, that' their wild billy. Feminism stops at Trump's beautiful wife.

NY Post published it but it's mostly liberals who are rejoice of this and used it as an attack on Melania's "fitness" to be the First Lady.

It's funny how you forgot to mention George Bush's past with cocaine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i predict that Melania's life will be made hell by Donald Trump once he loses the election. He will blame her mistakes for his defeat. He will dump her and marry another woman.

This. It really is almost Shakespearean--If Shakespeare had a written a lead character with a limited vocabulary.

If he wins he'll have to keep her around as long as he's in office. If not, isn't she at the age he had already dumped his other wives? I don't see Trump with a gracefully aging woman on his arm.

Eh. I don't like Trump, but I don't think we should shame women about their bodies, or what they do with them, either.

I do think it reflects on Trump that he only marries/dates women who are outwardly beautiful, and does not seem to have much respect or regard for women who are not traditionally beautiful, or are fat, etc. Women seem to have a "place" for him and it starts at adornment and window dressing. That makes me uncomfortable.

But I don't fault Melania for the pictures, or the Post for printing them as news I guess.

Anonymous wrote:i predict that Melania's life will be made hell by Donald Trump once he loses the election. He will blame her mistakes for his defeat. He will dump her and marry another woman.

This. It really is almost Shakespearean--If Shakespeare had a written a lead character with a limited vocabulary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?

They are a bunch of hypocrites. Snorting Cocaine is fine as long as it's done by Obama, dropping pants in front of a young intern in the White House is nothing, that' their wild billy. Feminism stops at Trump's beautiful wife.

NY Post published it but it's mostly liberals who are rejoice of this and used it as an attack on Melania's "fitness" to be the First Lady.

Thank you! Glad to know I am not the only one appalled by the hypocrisy.

These people are garbage--I knew it, but, here is the evidence.

The pictures are as shallow as her intellect.

Anonymous wrote:Eww. I think they do look porn-y. To me, though, it's not about the lewdness but about the fact that she sold her body to get money and success -- as she did in her marriage.

bc Hill and Bill don't have a marriage of convenience????

Anonymous wrote:Eww. I think they do look porn-y. To me, though, it's not about the lewdness but about the fact that she sold her body to get money and success -- as she did in her marriage.

I agree. They may well be "art" in Europe, but in this country (where they were taken), they are soft porn. The lighting, etc.

Anonymous wrote:The photos were probably pre-Trump, but why not finish a college? She had the time and money. If college is not for her, don't mention it or say it's not for you, but don't lie.

Yeah, I'm not sure she planned to lie about college -- her plan was always modeling and her wiki page says that she went to one year of college before leaving. I suspect someone in the campaign, or Trump himself, inflated her academic career. Probably Trump himself, he embellishes and puffs, that's what he does.