Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with you, OP. On the flip side, my DD is ready for kindergarten but misses the cut-off by a few days. A. few. days. For that I have to make her wait another year?
You wait or you go private for two years and transfer at 2nd, like others of us do. It sucks. I figured if I had to pay for another year of private preschool, might as well pay for private K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if I had to listen to that, I would not be able to help saying something. So over these people. No, I don't want my daughter dating a 19-20 year old man in high school. Your 5 year old is going to be just fine!
+1. Just glad the CogAT shows results by age so you don't get a bump for trying to game the system in school districts that use it to assess for AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Red shirting needs to end. The age range in classrooms is ridiculous. Few kids behave perfectly all day in K. Your gems will survive. No one red shirted when we were kids and we all were ready. You just want your kid to be bigger and better in sports. Just admit it. Its ridiculous. In our K class, the age gap is 19 months. What a ridiculous system. I can't wait for DCPS finally to stand up to parents on this one. Oh wait. Kaya is too busy traveling to Cuba and tweeting about politics to give a crap about what's happening in our classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:Red shirting needs to end. The age range in classrooms is ridiculous. Few kids behave perfectly all day in K. Your gems will survive. No one red shirted when we were kids and we all were ready. You just want your kid to be bigger and better in sports. Just admit it. Its ridiculous. In our K class, the age gap is 19 months. What a ridiculous system. I can't wait for DCPS finally to stand up to parents on this one. Oh wait. Kaya is too busy traveling to Cuba and tweeting about politics to give a crap about what's happening in our classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:I think if I had to listen to that, I would not be able to help saying something. So over these people. No, I don't want my daughter dating a 19-20 year old man in high school. Your 5 year old is going to be just fine!
Anonymous wrote:
I really don't worry about red-shirting except in terms of my own kids-- I went through puberty a few two years before most of my peers, very early, and that really affected two years of my school experience negatively, and I think that's where kids have the most trouble (and this will be different for boys vs. girls). I hope that other people consider this when thinking about whether to red shirt (or, as the case may be, skip a grade).
This is a really good point. Even if every kid in a class was born in the correct 12 months for that class, they will still all develop and mature at vastly different rates. Some will be taller, some will be shorter, some will develop social skills quickly, some will not, some will be better at math, some at reading, and some will be better athletes.
Kids will have to learn to deal with other kids who are different than they are no matter what. Parents should just do what they believe is best for their own children and not worry about other people's kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So send your kid to private K and then to first grade. That way they would have Kindergarten in a smaller setting with more play and recess. To redshirt you would need to pay for another year of pre K or private K anyway. Give your child that year in a smaller or possibly more nurturing environment and then send them on time with their age to first grade.
This is what we did with our DS, who is now about to turn 6 as Kindergarten ends. Last year at this time, at the end of preK 4, his teachers were advocating redshirting, sending him to the private's Junior Kindergarten rather than Kindergarten. He wasn't clicking academically and he was having some social issues, but we weighed all the factors very carefully and chose to have him enter Kindergarten. A big factor in the decision was who his teacher would be. Each of DH and I did an observation in the JK and in the K classes. The Kindergarten teacher impressed us with her attitude, demeanor, sense of humor and communication style. The JK teacher was a good teacher but we sensed very strongly that the Kindergarten teacher's personality and approach would "click" with him, and we were right. The small size of the Kindergarten class also has really fostered his growth academically and socially, with a lot of play and recess as the PP noted. Some of the class did Junior Kindergarten before coming into Kindergarten with him, and they are ahead of him academically (especially the girls) but so what?
I really don't worry about red-shirting except in terms of my own kids-- I went through puberty a few two years before most of my peers, very early, and that really affected two years of my school experience negatively, and I think that's where kids have the most trouble (and this will be different for boys vs. girls). I hope that other people consider this when thinking about whether to red shirt (or, as the case may be, skip a grade).
Anonymous wrote:[So send your kid to private K and then to first grade. That way they would have Kindergarten in a smaller setting with more play and recess. To redshirt you would need to pay for another year of pre K or private K anyway. Give your child that year in a smaller or possibly more nurturing environment and then send them on time with their age to first grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools are competitive between students in higher grades. Red-shirting is cheating at the game, plain and simple. Schools should enforce classroom age limites -- i.e., the rules of the game.
I agree completely. There should absolutely be stricter standards for redshirting. Not essentially because the parents feel like it.
Anonymous wrote:Schools are competitive between students in higher grades. Red-shirting is cheating at the game, plain and simple. Schools should enforce classroom age limites -- i.e., the rules of the game.