Anonymous wrote:I would definitely support Langley district affordable housing being built and sold by the developers making fortunes off Tysons ... Along with schools, bike paths, playing fields, etc. - all of which they could afford and integrate into the development. But the county doesn't make them do this, sadly for all of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Perhaps if you didn't sweat the small stuff like AAP at Cooper next fall so much, FCPS would have more courage about dealing with the bigger issues.

Has anyone considered what adding 300+ students in one year is going to do to the existing Cooper population? It seems to me that it would be less of a shake up for all students involved to do this in a phased approach-start with Kilmer which is most feeling the effects of overpopulation and then phase in Longfellow. I realize the school reportedly has the capacity for more students, but practically speaking let's get real!

[/b]This year's LLIV AAP program has already provided that step.

Local level IV provided the program, not the heavily increased population.

It also provided an uptick in enrollment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would definitely support Langley district affordable housing being built and sold by the developers making fortunes off Tysons ... Along with schools, bike paths, playing fields, etc. - all of which they could afford and integrate into the development. But the county doesn't make them do this, sadly for all of us.

I agree, Langley should be redistricted to accept apartments in Tysons and the outer areas of Langley should be sent to Herndon. At least it would be a step to provide more diversity at each high school even if those apartments aren't necessarily affordable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Perhaps if you didn't sweat the small stuff like AAP at Cooper next fall so much, FCPS would have more courage about dealing with the bigger issues.

Has anyone considered what adding 300+ students in one year is going to do to the existing Cooper population? It seems to me that it would be less of a shake up for all students involved to do this in a phased approach-start with Kilmer which is most feeling the effects of overpopulation and then phase in Longfellow. I realize the school reportedly has the capacity for more students, but practically speaking let's get real!

This year's LLIV AAP program has already provided that step.

Local level IV provided the program, not the heavily increased population.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Perhaps if you didn't sweat the small stuff like AAP at Cooper next fall so much, FCPS would have more courage about dealing with the bigger issues.

Has anyone considered what adding 300+ students in one year is going to do to the existing Cooper population? It seems to me that it would be less of a shake up for all students involved to do this in a phased approach-start with Kilmer which is most feeling the effects of overpopulation and then phase in Longfellow. I realize the school reportedly has the capacity for more students, but practically speaking let's get real!

This year's LLIV AAP program has already provided that step.

Anonymous wrote:I would definitely support Langley district affordable housing being built and sold by the developers making fortunes off Tysons ... Along with schools, bike paths, playing fields, etc. - all of which they could afford and integrate into the development. But the county doesn't make them do this, sadly for all of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Perhaps if you didn't sweat the small stuff like AAP at Cooper next fall so much, FCPS would have more courage about dealing with the bigger issues.

Has anyone considered what adding 300+ students in one year is going to do to the existing Cooper population? It seems to me that it would be less of a shake up for all students involved to do this in a phased approach-start with Kilmer which is most feeling the effects of overpopulation and then phase in Longfellow. I realize the school reportedly has the capacity for more students, but practically speaking let's get real!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Perhaps if you didn't sweat the small stuff like AAP at Cooper next fall so much, FCPS would have more courage about dealing with the bigger issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Exactly. The PP just wants to blame Langley families for anything and everything. I don't know anyone who wouldn't welcome ESOL or FARMS students to Langley. But where will they come from if the boundaries don't change? Somehow this is our fault for living where we do?

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the same opportunities, purchase a home in the Langley school district! Seems fairly straightforward!

We are in the Langley district and, aside from the Cooper issue, I really don't know what that bitter PP is complaining about. Our kids get exactly the same treatment as all other FCPS kids - well, except for the larger class sizes we get to deal with, of course.

There are larger class sizes beyond Langley.

Yep. But the Langley community is entitled to have smaller classes, don't you get it?

What you don't seem to get is the fact that the Langley community would like a FAIR SHARE of resources, including class sizes, that are afforded elsewhere in the county.

Not the poster to whom you responded, but Langley can have smaller classes when Langley accepts its fair share of ESOL and FARMS students. Until then, stop the whining.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the same opportunities, purchase a home in the Langley school district! Seems fairly straightforward!

We are in the Langley district and, aside from the Cooper issue, I really don't know what that bitter PP is complaining about. Our kids get exactly the same treatment as all other FCPS kids - well, except for the larger class sizes we get to deal with, of course.

There are larger class sizes beyond Langley.

Yep. But the Langley community is entitled to have smaller classes, don't you get it?

What you don't seem to get is the fact that the Langley community would like a FAIR SHARE of resources, including class sizes, that are afforded elsewhere in the county.

Anonymous wrote:Speaking as a Langley district parent I would definitely trade taking some esol or any other students for more per student funding and smaller classes. No brainer there. But the students aren't in Langley district.