Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do spank our kids. With an open hand or a willow wooden spoon. One swat for every year they are old.
My grandmother told me that HER mother used a cat o'nine tail on her and her sister!
BTW... we never spank in front of someone else. It's in a room with either myself or dh and the child, door closed.
So you would beat your child 5 times with a wooden spoon if they were 5?
That sounds like abuse.
Not beat. Swat on the bottom.
Anonymous wrote:Nope. The parents that spank are the ones who are too lazy to learn 'just as effective' discipline techniques. It's simply easier to hit because 'that's how I was raised and I turned out ok'. I will never understand how you can teach a child not to hit, but then hit this same child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do spank our kids. With an open hand or a willow wooden spoon. One swat for every year they are old.
My grandmother told me that HER mother used a cat o'nine tail on her and her sister!
BTW... we never spank in front of someone else. It's in a room with either myself or dh and the child, door closed.
So you would beat your child 5 times with a wooden spoon if they were 5?
That sounds like abuse.
Anonymous wrote:We do spank our kids. With an open hand or a willow wooden spoon. One swat for every year they are old.
My grandmother told me that HER mother used a cat o'nine tail on her and her sister!
BTW... we never spank in front of someone else. It's in a room with either myself or dh and the child, door closed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Like any consequence, the kids KNOW why they are being spanked, and we discuss the issue before and after the correction. Hugs, kisses, and reflection on how we can do better next time. "
Weird and creepy and pervy.
Np. This is what we do, too. Why do you think it's weird?
NP. I think it's weird too. It sounds cold and calculated. And you're teaching your kid that abuse is OK as long as the hitter gives you a hug and kiss later. Classic adult abuse situation, there.
Of course it's calculated. Kids should know what the consequence is for misbehavior.
And how is a swat on the rear abuse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. This article does a good job of summarizing some of the relevant research: http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking.aspx
I see no indication of controlling for SES, or researching the different kinds of physical punishment. A swat on the rear end for something extremely out of line is vastly different than spanking with a belt or paddle, and it's a shame this "research" didn't differentiate.
PP here. That was not a link to a study. It was an article by the APA summarizing several scientific studies done that all had the same conclusion. The definitive work was done in 2008 by Gershoff and I just like to the study. Read it if you care to. Or keep justifying hitting your children if you would like to do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. This article does a good job of summarizing some of the relevant research: http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking.aspx
I see no indication of controlling for SES, or researching the different kinds of physical punishment. A swat on the rear end for something extremely out of line is vastly different than spanking with a belt or paddle, and it's a shame this "research" didn't differentiate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, different punishments work on different children. Do what works for your child. There is no research that states that, in and of itself, a handful of spankings with an open hand in childhood negatively impacts a child.
A lot of adults have been spanked as kids with no lasting negative impact, and they manage to still have close, loving relationships with their parents. Some obviously have issues, but I suspect there may have been more things going on there to cause some emotional/mental issues down the line than simply a handful of spankings as a child.
There IS actually research that shows that spanking, with an open hand or otherwise, DOES, in fact, negatively impact the child. But, my assumption is that those of you that stank your kids are not making an informed, evidence-based decision based on what is best for your child.
Not research that controls for the type, frequency, severity of spanking, or controls for SES, or controls for the type of children predisposed to behavior more likely to earn soakings, etc.
Okay you obviously have not read the research that I have. Makes me wonder if you are just making this up. The study I read was longitudinal and included a range of spanking disciple and found that across the board, spanking had negative outcomes. Don't kid yourself that hitting them is good for them. It is not.
Do you care to share the article you read?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, different punishments work on different children. Do what works for your child. There is no research that states that, in and of itself, a handful of spankings with an open hand in childhood negatively impacts a child.
A lot of adults have been spanked as kids with no lasting negative impact, and they manage to still have close, loving relationships with their parents. Some obviously have issues, but I suspect there may have been more things going on there to cause some emotional/mental issues down the line than simply a handful of spankings as a child.
There IS actually research that shows that spanking, with an open hand or otherwise, DOES, in fact, negatively impact the child. But, my assumption is that those of you that stank your kids are not making an informed, evidence-based decision based on what is best for your child.
Not research that controls for the type, frequency, severity of spanking, or controls for SES, or controls for the type of children predisposed to behavior more likely to earn soakings, etc.
Okay you obviously have not read the research that I have. Makes me wonder if you are just making this up. The study I read was longitudinal and included a range of spanking disciple and found that across the board, spanking had negative outcomes. Don't kid yourself that hitting them is good for them. It is not.
Anonymous wrote:PP here. This article does a good job of summarizing some of the relevant research: http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking.aspx
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, different punishments work on different children. Do what works for your child. There is no research that states that, in and of itself, a handful of spankings with an open hand in childhood negatively impacts a child.
A lot of adults have been spanked as kids with no lasting negative impact, and they manage to still have close, loving relationships with their parents. Some obviously have issues, but I suspect there may have been more things going on there to cause some emotional/mental issues down the line than simply a handful of spankings as a child.
There IS actually research that shows that spanking, with an open hand or otherwise, DOES, in fact, negatively impact the child. But, my assumption is that those of you that stank your kids are not making an informed, evidence-based decision based on what is best for your child.
Not research that controls for the type, frequency, severity of spanking, or controls for SES, or controls for the type of children predisposed to behavior more likely to earn soakings, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Oh, measured and controlled hitting? Got it. Do you teach them they can hit others, as long as they aren't angry?