Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.
In our case I wonder if the school should not have told the parents about some students needing extra help, attention ecc
We have a child with an extra handler but if my child had not told me I would never know what goes on in the class room.
I also agree parents should stay out but the school does not communicate openly and honestly about these children and their needs or how the class might be impacted. No wonder parents get upset if we have to find out through the back door. Also parents of SN in my child's class pretend they are not, so That does not help communication either.
Do you really think a school should share with you confidential information about other children? FERPA may not apply in private schools, but basic ethical standards do. Sheesh.
I don't mean medical information but I feel it is dishonest of the school to pretend there are no challenges to the class and teachers by bringing certain students to the mix. The school accepts the kids based on $$$ but the teachers and class have to make it work.
A school absolutely cannot disclose this kind of information about another student. It isn't a "back door" its basic ethics and possibly the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.
In our case I wonder if the school should not have told the parents about some students needing extra help, attention ecc
We have a child with an extra handler but if my child had not told me I would never know what goes on in the class room.
I also agree parents should stay out but the school does not communicate openly and honestly about these children and their needs or how the class might be impacted. No wonder parents get upset if we have to find out through the back door. Also parents of SN in my child's class pretend they are not, so That does not help communication either.
Do you really think a school should share with you confidential information about other children? FERPA may not apply in private schools, but basic ethical standards do. Sheesh.
I don't mean medical information but I feel it is dishonest of the school to pretend there are no challenges to the class and teachers by bringing certain students to the mix. The school accepts the kids based on $$$ but the teachers and class have to make it work.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher with a special ed background.
My son also has some special needs. (He needs reminders, a lot, but is quick in other ways).
As a parent, I pay for private assistance outside of school to help him keep up.
When our school had some kids that needed more assistance (1:1 reteaching, etc.) more staff was hired.
The expectation was that the parent would pay for the assistant.
Some schools charge more for children who need additional staffing, and have programs for it.
You may want to speak to the director about this.
I agree, though, that sometimes what is good for the children with labels benefit others who don't have labels.
Look up Universal Design for Learning, and the Center for Applied Special Technologies for some ideas on how differentiation works.
We use a rotation model at that age level (look up blended learning) so kids can work independently, in small groups and with some direction from the teacher, as needed.
What makes me crazy is when parents who have kids with special issues don't face it and "hide" their kids in schools where they can't have IEPs and expect the issues to go away, because on the surface, they seem typical/average. This happens and the teachers hands are tied, especially when THEY are also clients spending over $30K.
If a child needs a really fast pace (IQs from 125/130-140+) they should have a teacher who is gifted certified or at least aware how to differentiate up in graceful way. It is something to research when you are looking into programs for your kids.
(Sorry to be so abrupt when I say, "look up". I mean it in a "you might be curious about" way, not a "check yourself before you wreck yourself" way, and I'm sleepy.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you observing the classroom. Parents should not be in the classroom!
I don't think you are educated enough on the subject to understand what you are observing.
Parents should ALWAYS be allowed to observe in the classroom, especially if they are paying $35,000 per year.
No. They shouldn't. Because OP has show how ignorant she is and she no doubt has violated the privacy kids should be afford end e classroom by talking to her "friends" about her "observations".
I pay $35k because the school can pay for trained teachers and aids and busy body moms can stay at the country club.
Being an involved parents means having an idea what goes on when our children are in the care of professionals. It's nice that you are wiling to hand the care and education of your children over to professionals without any involvement or supervision, but some of us prefer to actually raise our own kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.
In our case I wonder if the school should not have told the parents about some students needing extra help, attention ecc
We have a child with an extra handler but if my child had not told me I would never know what goes on in the class room.
I also agree parents should stay out but the school does not communicate openly and honestly about these children and their needs or how the class might be impacted. No wonder parents get upset if we have to find out through the back door. Also parents of SN in my child's class pretend they are not, so That does not help communication either.
Anonymous wrote:My eight year old son has special needs-- ADHD and a learning disability. It would be fantastic if his school would skip elementary math and move straight to algebra so that he's no longer hampered by the slower pace of his NT classmates.
As it is, he has to be taught math individually because he requires one and usually zero explanations when it comes to math concepts.
Not helpful, I know-- but these assumptions about SN really piss me off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.
In our case I wonder if the school should not have told the parents about some students needing extra help, attention ecc
We have a child with an extra handler but if my child had not told me I would never know what goes on in the class room.
I also agree parents should stay out but the school does not communicate openly and honestly about these children and their needs or how the class might be impacted. No wonder parents get upset if we have to find out through the back door. Also parents of SN in my child's class pretend they are not, so That does not help communication either.
Do you really think a school should share with you confidential information about other children? FERPA may not apply in private schools, but basic ethical standards do. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.
In our case I wonder if the school should not have told the parents about some students needing extra help, attention ecc
We have a child with an extra handler but if my child had not told me I would never know what goes on in the class room.
I also agree parents should stay out but the school does not communicate openly and honestly about these children and their needs or how the class might be impacted. No wonder parents get upset if we have to find out through the back door. Also parents of SN in my child's class pretend they are not, so That does not help communication either.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for summing up what many SN parents suspect the other parents think of their children, but won't admit to.