Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:oh please. my track booster club in Iowa raised money for electronic scoring system and no one $hit a brick in the other school districts. only mcps. as if half the country doesn't already subsidize the other half.
Hi Mitt!
Anonymous wrote:oh please. my track booster club in Iowa raised money for electronic scoring system and no one $hit a brick in the other school districts. only mcps. as if half the country doesn't already subsidize the other half.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The butlers will be mobilized to ferry the children to the nearest organic grass field.
Seriously, I am opposed to this field and not because I think my kids are too fancy for it. The field is too fancy for my children. Full stop.
BS you live here, come to one of the community meetings which have been mostly positive on the issue. Voice your dissent if you actually qualify to get in.
Uh, what? I just bought here. Posts like this make me wonder if that was a good call. "Qualify to get in"??????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The butlers will be mobilized to ferry the children to the nearest organic grass field.
Seriously, I am opposed to this field and not because I think my kids are too fancy for it. The field is too fancy for my children. Full stop.
BS you live here, come to one of the community meetings which have been mostly positive on the issue. Voice your dissent if you actually qualify to get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The butlers will be mobilized to ferry the children to the nearest organic grass field.
Seriously, I am opposed to this field and not because I think my kids are too fancy for it. The field is too fancy for my children. Full stop.
Anonymous wrote:
Why the nastiness? As I just said, I'm new to this community and trying to get myself informed on this issue. I'm certainly grateful to people who generously donate their time and money to the community. And maybe I WILL direct a major fundraising effort on some other issue at some point! But for now I'm trying to understand this one. You seem to be expressing the attitude that only people who donate big $$$ have the right to an opinion on things that may involve the health and safety of ALL children at the school, not just donor children. Not to mention the local ecosystem. Maybe I'm misreading you, though--apologies if so!