Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, pot has higher concentrations of known carcinogens than unfiltered tobacco does.
Please, list off these "known carcinogens" in marijuana. We'll be waiting.
NP here. And a smoker.
Are you really trying to claim that inhaling smoke is fine???
Cannabis smoke contains many of the same cancer causing substances (carcinogens) as tobacco - at least 50 of them. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancers-in-general/cancer-questions/does-smoking-cannabis-cause-cancer
News flash, grandma: Usage via combustion is on the decline. Vaporization, as like vaping nicotine, is very popular in CA, CO, etc. As technology improves, costs decline and access improves, fewer people will use combustion for usage. Bad news for you, what will you have to cry about then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I use to know a pot head named Steve Jobs who did quite well for himself.
He's died at age 56 from pancreatic cancer. Smoking cigarettes doubles your risk for pancreatic cancer. As more people smoke pot, there is more research being done on whether smoking pot, which has many of the same carcinogens in it, may have a causal effect on cancer as well.
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe your definition of a regular teenager is being an asshole to your family. It's not mine. Raise your standards a bit.
Anonymous wrote:
The PP was right about "vaping", which is what they do to avoid smoke inhalation issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't there a difference between a "pothead" and a casual user? Wouldn't our responses be different if Teen was spending most days stoned and blowing off work and reaponsibilities vs partying evenings and weekends with kids he won't be hanging with in the fall?
I think the response needs to be proportionate with how big a problem it is. A delicate balance.
Sounds like the OP's son meets your pothead definition. Frequent use, bad attitude, etc.
That's not "pothead definition." That's the definition of a teenager, duh, especially one getting ridden by his parents over perceived "drug" usage.
The stupidity flowing in this thread is amazing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, pot has higher concentrations of known carcinogens than unfiltered tobacco does.
Please, list off these "known carcinogens" in marijuana. We'll be waiting.
NP here. And a smoker.
Are you really trying to claim that inhaling smoke is fine???
Cannabis smoke contains many of the same cancer causing substances (carcinogens) as tobacco - at least 50 of them. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancers-in-general/cancer-questions/does-smoking-cannabis-cause-cancer
News flash, grandma: Usage via combustion is on the decline. Vaporization, as like vaping nicotine, is very popular in CA, CO, etc. As technology improves, costs decline and access improves, fewer people will use combustion for usage. Bad news for you, what will you have to cry about then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't there a difference between a "pothead" and a casual user? Wouldn't our responses be different if Teen was spending most days stoned and blowing off work and reaponsibilities vs partying evenings and weekends with kids he won't be hanging with in the fall?
I think the response needs to be proportionate with how big a problem it is. A delicate balance.
Sounds like the OP's son meets your pothead definition. Frequent use, bad attitude, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, pot has higher concentrations of known carcinogens than unfiltered tobacco does.
Please, list off these "known carcinogens" in marijuana. We'll be waiting.
NP here. And a smoker.
Are you really trying to claim that inhaling smoke is fine???
Cannabis smoke contains many of the same cancer causing substances (carcinogens) as tobacco - at least 50 of them. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancers-in-general/cancer-questions/does-smoking-cannabis-cause-cancer
Anonymous wrote:Lol..and I'm not on it. Repost: why does everyone think pot is so benign?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol..and I'm not on it. Repost: why does everyone think pot is so benign?
I hate the stuff but it's probably just fine for people over 21. I have zero tolerance for teen use.
Anonymous wrote:Lol..and I'm not on it. Repost: why does everyone think pot is so benign?
Anonymous wrote:Isn't there a difference between a "pothead" and a casual user? Wouldn't our responses be different if Teen was spending most days stoned and blowing off work and reaponsibilities vs partying evenings and weekends with kids he won't be hanging with in the fall?
I think the response needs to be proportionate with how big a problem it is. A delicate balance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I use to know a pot head named Steve Jobs who did quite well for himself.
Really? Because he died young of a complicated cancer.Why foes everyone thing pot is so benign?