Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
That is true (PK-3, but whatever; and several years ago). But what you are talking about doesn't really involve a net increase in kids. If Hearst stopped at 3rd grade, then Janney and Murch would have to be that much larger. Janney's growth is almost entirely IB, and despite this thread Murch's is not far behind. So those schools would be even more overcrowded. Hearst would take in at early grades the same mix of IB/OOB kids as it does now, and the same number of OOB kids would continue on through the feeder. Yes, maybe Hearst (because it wouldn't have them) and Murch (because it would have intake from Hearst) wouldn't take OOB kids at 4th and 5th grade but I doubt much of that is happening anyway.
Hearst has significantly fewer IB kids. You could make Hearst the pre-k to 2nd or 3rd grade alternative for Murch and Janney. Murch and Janney would then have significantly fewer grades and kids. The expectation that children should start school at 4 is increasing the pressure on schools that were already at capacity.
Or more realistically you could just change the boundaries! But that didn't go over so well at either Janney or Murch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
That is true (PK-3, but whatever; and several years ago). But what you are talking about doesn't really involve a net increase in kids. If Hearst stopped at 3rd grade, then Janney and Murch would have to be that much larger. Janney's growth is almost entirely IB, and despite this thread Murch's is not far behind. So those schools would be even more overcrowded. Hearst would take in at early grades the same mix of IB/OOB kids as it does now, and the same number of OOB kids would continue on through the feeder. Yes, maybe Hearst (because it wouldn't have them) and Murch (because it would have intake from Hearst) wouldn't take OOB kids at 4th and 5th grade but I doubt much of that is happening anyway.
Hearst has significantly fewer IB kids. You could make Hearst the pre-k to 2nd or 3rd grade alternative for Murch and Janney. Murch and Janney would then have significantly fewer grades and kids. The expectation that children should start school at 4 is increasing the pressure on schools that were already at capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
That is true (PK-3, but whatever; and several years ago). But what you are talking about doesn't really involve a net increase in kids. If Hearst stopped at 3rd grade, then Janney and Murch would have to be that much larger. Janney's growth is almost entirely IB, and despite this thread Murch's is not far behind. So those schools would be even more overcrowded. Hearst would take in at early grades the same mix of IB/OOB kids as it does now, and the same number of OOB kids would continue on through the feeder. Yes, maybe Hearst (because it wouldn't have them) and Murch (because it would have intake from Hearst) wouldn't take OOB kids at 4th and 5th grade but I doubt much of that is happening anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
That is true (PK-3, but whatever; and several years ago). But what you are talking about doesn't really involve a net increase in kids. If Hearst stopped at 3rd grade, then Janney and Murch would have to be that much larger. Janney's growth is almost entirely IB, and despite this thread Murch's is not far behind. So those schools would be even more overcrowded. Hearst would take in at early grades the same mix of IB/OOB kids as it does now, and the same number of OOB kids would continue on through the feeder. Yes, maybe Hearst (because it wouldn't have them) and Murch (because it would have intake from Hearst) wouldn't take OOB kids at 4th and 5th grade but I doubt much of that is happening anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Remember two years ago when DCPS did the language push on schools? The Murch principal asked parents and the Deal principal what was most useful for the kids as a special, language or geography? Geography it was which is now in the rotation with music, art, library and gym on the specials schedule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
Right. And while semantically correct that Hearst did not expand the new building enrollment beyond the capacity of the old building and the trailers, they had added trailers as enrollment (80 plus % out of boundary students) grew.
Essentially DCPS has enlarged a school knowing that it is some distance from where the overwhelming majority of the students live. Wouldn't a smarter decision have been to modernize and improve the local schools in the neighborhoods where the kids actually live?
Hearst used to be only a primary school (K-2) and the kids moved to either Janney or Murch at 3rd grade. The renovation was to provide space for all elementary grades, previously served using trailers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still looking for the source of this rumor -- is everybody arguing about something that isn't really happening?
http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Learn+About+Schools/Lottery+and+Admissions:+Apply+to+Our+Schools
Anonymous wrote:Still looking for the source of this rumor -- is everybody arguing about something that isn't really happening?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
That's another well planned renovation- 2classes per grade? Here come the trailers... Just give it a year or two.
Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there will be no space on the grounds for trailers, it is next to houses and a public park. They couldn't add a third classroom to each grade.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
As demonstrated by Murch and Lafayette (and counsel others, I'm sure) there is always space for trailers, if that is what has to be done. Even if it means taking up some play space (for example, the blue top at Lafayette).
They found room for trailers at Key and Stoddert after renovations. There's always room for trailers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there will be no space on the grounds for trailers, it is next to houses and a public park. They couldn't add a third classroom to each grade.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will not happen at Hearst because there is only room for 2 classes per grade even in the new school.
For now. Which means either bigger classes or cramming extra class rooms into other space (or trailers), right?
As demonstrated by Murch and Lafayette (and counsel others, I'm sure) there is always space for trailers, if that is what has to be done. Even if it means taking up some play space (for example, the blue top at Lafayette).