Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's all a beautiful argument, but there's no way to call it anything other than what it is: a way to white-wash the classrooms. And, I get it, that's fine. Would I rather you take your kid and $s out of DCPS and go private or charter? No. It's not an either/or proposition, it's just an us/them solution - and you're right, $s for the school is $s for the school, but it would be great if that meant an equal amount would be spent on each child, or better yet, MORE Would be spent on the kids that need more, which aren't the Mandarin-immersion kids.
I'm not sure what the solution is, because this is the same problem in every other public school EOTP: gotta have a hook or it's too hard to justify sending kiddo in. To that end, is it the best solution? Mandarin just seems like the LAST thing they should be using to differentiate. Spanish, French, literally any other language will make it easier for the lower-SES parent to access, so perhaps this is what makes it seem so unpalatable.
+1billion.
+ another billion. The initiative smacks of entitlement and is more than a little naive.
Anonymous wrote:It's all a beautiful argument, but there's no way to call it anything other than what it is: a way to white-wash the classrooms. And, I get it, that's fine. Would I rather you take your kid and $s out of DCPS and go private or charter? No. It's not an either/or proposition, it's just an us/them solution - and you're right, $s for the school is $s for the school, but it would be great if that meant an equal amount would be spent on each child, or better yet, MORE Would be spent on the kids that need more, which aren't the Mandarin-immersion kids.
I'm not sure what the solution is, because this is the same problem in every other public school EOTP: gotta have a hook or it's too hard to justify sending kiddo in. To that end, is it the best solution? Mandarin just seems like the LAST thing they should be using to differentiate. Spanish, French, literally any other language will make it easier for the lower-SES parent to access, so perhaps this is what makes it seem so unpalatable.
Anonymous wrote:warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read on other posts about Yu Ying that it takes quite a bit of parental commitment for their children to succeed at Yu Ying. If the parents at Miner are not willing to make the investment in their children's education with a single language track, what makes DCPS think that these same parents will make the commitment to see their kids flourish in Mandarin?
What makes me think they will succeed is because the parents who choose the Mandarin immersion will be the parents who make the commitment to see their kids flourish. Why would we assume that Yu Ying parents are willing to make an investment in their child's education but parent's who would put their child in an immersion program anywhere else wouldn't make that same commitment?
It appears you are assuming that the kids currently at Miner in the grades above pre-K and Kindergarten would be introduced to Mandarin. They would not. There is a large percentage of people who are currently inbound for Miner that do not send their kids to the school. There is a desire to reverse that trend and create a true neighborhood school.
Yu Ying accepts children up to the second grade with no Mandarin background. Why would Miner have to limit Mandarin to entering pre-K children only?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's all a beautiful argument, but there's no way to call it anything other than what it is: a way to white-wash the classrooms. And, I get it, that's fine. Would I rather you take your kid and $s out of DCPS and go private or charter? No. It's not an either/or proposition, it's just an us/them solution - and you're right, $s for the school is $s for the school, but it would be great if that meant an equal amount would be spent on each child, or better yet, MORE Would be spent on the kids that need more, which aren't the Mandarin-immersion kids.
I'm not sure what the solution is, because this is the same problem in every other public school EOTP: gotta have a hook or it's too hard to justify sending kiddo in. To that end, is it the best solution? Mandarin just seems like the LAST thing they should be using to differentiate. Spanish, French, literally any other language will make it easier for the lower-SES parent to access, so perhaps this is what makes it seem so unpalatable.
+1billion.
warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stupid question- does it HAVE to be Mandarin?
I believe that DCPS will choose the language by what is available to them. DCPS knows that Yu Ying has extensive waiting lists for their Mandarin program.
It will not be Spanish because they already have immersion schools for Spanish.
I have had reservations about Mandarin as well, but after reading and understanding that Elementary kids can soak up Mandarin as easily as French or Spanish at that age, then my uneasiness was alleviated.
The benefits of a child being exposed to Mandarin at such a young age is that they are learning a Level 6 language (language difficulty ranking based on learning a language as a adult). If you learn a higher level language, it becomes immensely easier to learn a lower level language later in life. So if you wanted your kid to learn French or Spanish, he/she will have a easier time with it because of their exposure to Mandarin at the Elementary level.
I agree with everything you're saying, BUT, I don't see how people will be drawn to AND STAY IN a school with a 20% proficiency rate across the board when the language is Mandarin. Honestly it's hard enough to support the Spanish language in a place where so many kids have access to spanish speakers. I can't imagine how that would even be possible with Mandarin.
The language would start only at the earlier grades. It's impractical to start at every grade. So you would have Pre-K and Kindergarten as your beginning Mandarin students. As these kids move up through the school, the Mandarin education would move up with them until it reaches all grades at the school. I agree that you don't start introducing Mandarin to kids who haven't been exposed to it at the pre-K or Kindergarten level.
I don't understand what you mean by support? Does every child learning Spanish at school have Spanish speaking parents? I highly doubt that. Do you mean support groups that help parents? Here's one...
http://paassc.com/ - African American parent group for children learning Chinese
Anonymous wrote:It's all a beautiful argument, but there's no way to call it anything other than what it is: a way to white-wash the classrooms. And, I get it, that's fine. Would I rather you take your kid and $s out of DCPS and go private or charter? No. It's not an either/or proposition, it's just an us/them solution - and you're right, $s for the school is $s for the school, but it would be great if that meant an equal amount would be spent on each child, or better yet, MORE Would be spent on the kids that need more, which aren't the Mandarin-immersion kids.
I'm not sure what the solution is, because this is the same problem in every other public school EOTP: gotta have a hook or it's too hard to justify sending kiddo in. To that end, is it the best solution? Mandarin just seems like the LAST thing they should be using to differentiate. Spanish, French, literally any other language will make it easier for the lower-SES parent to access, so perhaps this is what makes it seem so unpalatable.
warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read on other posts about Yu Ying that it takes quite a bit of parental commitment for their children to succeed at Yu Ying. If the parents at Miner are not willing to make the investment in their children's education with a single language track, what makes DCPS think that these same parents will make the commitment to see their kids flourish in Mandarin?
What makes me think they will succeed is because the parents who choose the Mandarin immersion will be the parents who make the commitment to see their kids flourish. Why would we assume that Yu Ying parents are willing to make an investment in their child's education but parent's who would put their child in an immersion program anywhere else wouldn't make that same commitment?
It appears you are assuming that the kids currently at Miner in the grades above pre-K and Kindergarten would be introduced to Mandarin. They would not. There is a large percentage of people who are currently inbound for Miner that do not send their kids to the school. There is a desire to reverse that trend and create a true neighborhood school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stupid question- does it HAVE to be Mandarin?
I believe that DCPS will choose the language by what is available to them. DCPS knows that Yu Ying has extensive waiting lists for their Mandarin program.
It will not be Spanish because they already have immersion schools for Spanish.
I have had reservations about Mandarin as well, but after reading and understanding that Elementary kids can soak up Mandarin as easily as French or Spanish at that age, then my uneasiness was alleviated.
The benefits of a child being exposed to Mandarin at such a young age is that they are learning a Level 6 language (language difficulty ranking based on learning a language as a adult). If you learn a higher level language, it becomes immensely easier to learn a lower level language later in life. So if you wanted your kid to learn French or Spanish, he/she will have a easier time with it because of their exposure to Mandarin at the Elementary level.
I agree with everything you're saying, BUT, I don't see how people will be drawn to AND STAY IN a school with a 20% proficiency rate across the board when the language is Mandarin. Honestly it's hard enough to support the Spanish language in a place where so many kids have access to spanish speakers. I can't imagine how that would even be possible with Mandarin.
Sorry for the duplicate post. I would also add that it makes no sense to say, oh we've got too many spanish programs as it is considering the waitlists for these spanish DCPS schools. Even the disaster that is Tyler has an almost 100 child waitlist for pk3.
Anonymous wrote:I have read on other posts about Yu Ying that it takes quite a bit of parental commitment for their children to succeed at Yu Ying. If the parents at Miner are not willing to make the investment in their children's education with a single language track, what makes DCPS think that these same parents will make the commitment to see their kids flourish in Mandarin?
Anonymous wrote:^ Interesting. Could you site any sources?
Anonymous wrote:warrenox wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stupid question- does it HAVE to be Mandarin?
I believe that DCPS will choose the language by what is available to them. DCPS knows that Yu Ying has extensive waiting lists for their Mandarin program.
It will not be Spanish because they already have immersion schools for Spanish.
I have had reservations about Mandarin as well, but after reading and understanding that Elementary kids can soak up Mandarin as easily as French or Spanish at that age, then my uneasiness was alleviated.
The benefits of a child being exposed to Mandarin at such a young age is that they are learning a Level 6 language (language difficulty ranking based on learning a language as a adult). If you learn a higher level language, it becomes immensely easier to learn a lower level language later in life. So if you wanted your kid to learn French or Spanish, he/she will have a easier time with it because of their exposure to Mandarin at the Elementary level.
I agree with everything you're saying, BUT, I don't see how people will be drawn to AND STAY IN a school with a 20% proficiency rate across the board when the language is Mandarin. Honestly it's hard enough to support the Spanish language in a place where so many kids have access to spanish speakers. I can't imagine how that would even be possible with Mandarin.