Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look here folks who are fine with the PARCC tests and the direction public education is headed: no one is trying to convince you nor did we ask for an opinion.
You are simply a distraction on this thread because it is obvious that you are either obsessed with your own kids or don't really understand the stakes and what happens in schools on a daily basis or how it has been changing in the last few years. I would bet big money none of you are teachers currently active in the classroom.
Your bullying is not likely to move the conversation in any positive direction or to sway the opinions of people who are actually informed. Just so's you know.
Based on what I know, the anti-test folks don't have a sound argument. And that's confirmed again and again by these threads.
the argument is simple and strong and comes from the poster from the EOTP school: they are spending school time on
teaching the kids how to understand the directions on the PARCC which apparently are difficult to follow even if you are reading at grade level, and these standards for elementary school kids were set without consulting ANY experts in early childhood education and the luminaries in a variety of fields - educators, psychologists, etc have publicly stated their opposition to drill and kill approaches that start in 2nd and 3rd grade. And THAT is what this is about. The people who designed the test admit it is not diagnostic. They admit there are two right answers to some questions. And they have ignored all the experts on early childhood education who say that what the consequences of these tests for the schools, teachers and principals are forcing them to do to our children, especially the ones who are behind and at risk, is not good for them
once someone admits that their frigging test is not diagnostic what is the point of taking it? and if the instructions are so hard to understand that class time has to be WASTED on that instead of actually learning the content of the common core shame on them. And if there are two right answers and teachers careers are riding on the results they really ought to have done a better job of......
creating a test that
is diagnostic (so it is helpful to individual kids and parents) - the DC CAS did that for us
consistent with standards set by experts in early childhood education not anyone else
the higher the grade the more rigorous and rigid the standards fine by me
the kids at private school aren't doing drill and kill in third and 4th grade, and neither are the kids at Janney
and finally implemented in a way where
kids can't fail because they are given instructions they cannot parse
and third graders, especially in poor parts of the country, but really anywhere, are not expected to know how to type
THAT ALONE - the knowledge that my third grade daughter is going to do badly on the test because she is unfamiliar with typing and we limit her screen time - should just be such a huge red flag to anyone with an ounce of common sense
but add to that the fact that in at least one EOTP school they are spending days trying to understand
not the content of the common core
but how to understand the complicated directions
and that the test is not diagnostic? what is the point?
I am not anti-testing. I am not anti national standards, which is why I love the NAEP. I am not anti common core (except for the standards it sets for third graders in math because I think it makes them move way too fast)
I have just, and only through reading all the links on all these threads, become anti PARCC
there is a HUGE difference
and I don't like the idea that my youngest child is going to come home feeling like she failed a test
when my three others always thought the DC CAS was so easy.... and have always scored advanced
because my kid doesn't know how to type yet, and we keep her away from almost everything on the computer and TV and limit screen time severely even when it comes to "educational games." Her older sibs can type, program, make power point presentations - there is a time for that. Third grade is not time for typing in my opinion, and I bet most third graders in the US cannot really type.... not enough to "explain their answers"
so I don't think it is fair to younger kids, I think the standards were made without consulting the right people
and it sounds like the format of this particular test is fundamentally flawed
and people have given you
so many links to respected authorities in their respective fields who have come out against the PARCC - not national standards and not testing - that maybe you should read some of them. Consider me a convert