Anonymous wrote:
When I brought home the statement from the doctor that my children were technically obese, everyone did a double take. They are both quite tall for their ages and universally mistaken for being older. They don't look at all chubby or even plump. The ratio is appropriate.
Still.
I re-visited our diet and removed some snacks. I also added more opportunities for exercise. Nothing major.
Why not take in the feedback from your doctor? It prompted me to improve the good habits that were already in place and remove a couple of things from my grocery list that didn't fully contribute to healthy energy and high-power nutrition.
We all have room to improve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good grief. My DS is three, 50 lbs and 43". He's fat. It's called having tall parents. Gigantism has features beyond being big.
All fixed.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief. My DS is three, 50 lbs and 43". He's fat. It's called having tall parents. Gigantism has features beyond being big.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing. A child who is 95%ile for height isn't supposed to be 95%ile for weight. That's not the way it works. If you think it is, discuss it with your Ped and they will explain.
95% for weight is almost always overweight. 95%ile for height is just tall. My three kids in the 90+%ile for height all have different body types, different skeletons, builds, etc. None of them have ever been over 75%ILE for weight after a year and you would never think they were too thin.
That's not true at all. my kids are 99% for height and one of them is in the 75% for weight, the other is 95%. Neither is fat, They are just super tall. Their pediatrician agrees. They, however, are not anywhere near as heavy as OP's kid.
Anonymous wrote:At my son's 4 yo well visit, he was the same height (42 inches) and weighed 40 lbs.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing. A child who is 95%ile for height isn't supposed to be 95%ile for weight. That's not the way it works. If you think it is, discuss it with your Ped and they will explain.
95% for weight is almost always overweight. 95%ile for height is just tall. My three kids in the 90+%ile for height all have different body types, different skeletons, builds, etc. None of them have ever been over 75%ILE for weight after a year and you would never think they were too thin.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief. My DS is three, 50 lbs and 43". He's fine. It's called having tall parents. Gigantism has features beyond being big.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid's BMI is in the 99th percentile rank, which is classified as obese. They have done studies that show most parents if overweight kids don't think their kids are overweight. You really should get a referral to a nutritionist.
This. OP use the calculator on webmd and read the results. They aren't great and explain your doctors concern. http://www.webmd.com/parenting/raising-fit-kids/weight/bmi/bmi-calculator
I just plugged my DS info on this calculator and he's considered obese on it. He's extremely tall and lean - you can see his ribs and hip bones poking out. He towers above kids several years older than he is. I brothers who are over 6'8" and they are extremely skinny.
These BMI calculators are obviously missing something!!
Or maybe you typed in the numbers wrong.
Nope. Definitely didn't type in the numbers wrong. BMI is a very flawed system of measurement.
Agree, my BMI actually increased after I lost 40 lbs. I don't trust it at all.
That's impossible. You did something wrong.
Anonymous wrote:uh..I weighed less than your three year old in third grade.