Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?
The
I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

I'll get attacked. Guaranteed.

I really want to know why any woman feels that her feelings and needs are more important than her husbands. Vaginas don't give you special privileges. You don't get to reject people because you have one.

Actually do. Just like you get to reject someone if you have a dick. It's called being a human being.

No one is entitled to sex. No one is obligated to give sex when they aren't feeling like it- and yes, that includes spouses. No one is entitled to ownership of another person's body.

Ah, actually not true. There is an obligation to provide sex in marriage.

There's an obligation to go into it representing yourself honestly, i.e. not lying about how much sex you will think you want to have. If you purposefully lie about how often you will predict that you'll want to have sex, that is wrong.

But to go into it hoping you will have sex every day, and you find that your libido has died, or that you are too exhausted with the work of keeping a house, working outside the home, or raising children, or you simply lose desire and affection for our spouse, and feel alienated from them, no you have no obligation to sleep with them. Which is why marital rape is recognized as a thing which very much exists, despite what some men want to believe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?
The
I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

I'll get attacked. Guaranteed.

I really want to know why any woman feels that her feelings and needs are more important than her husbands. Vaginas don't give you special privileges. You don't get to reject people because you have one.

Actually do. Just like you get to reject someone if you have a dick. It's called being a human being.

No one is entitled to sex. No one is obligated to give sex when they aren't feeling like it- and yes, that includes spouses. No one is entitled to ownership of another person's body.

Ah, actually not true. There is an obligation to provide sex in marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

Me again - I have a theory (just dawned on me). Hard core feminism of the kind in this thread relies on diminishing men to the point where they are less than a person. That, then, gives them the right to reject and feel they should be exonerated as well.

Uh, exonerated from what exactly? The rejection police? There is nothing to be exonerated from as no one, male or female, owes any other person on this planet sex. And no one, make or female, should be guilted or forced into having it against their will.

Honestly, you sound eerily like Elliot Rodgers, who so famously thought women should be "punished" for not having sex with him. Sexual entitlement is a very dangerous thing indeed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?
The
I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

I'll get attacked. Guaranteed.

I really want to know why any woman feels that her feelings and needs are more important than her husbands. Vaginas don't give you special privileges. You don't get to reject people because you have one.

Actually do. Just like you get to reject someone if you have a dick. It's called being a human being.

No one is entitled to sex. No one is obligated to give sex when they aren't feeling like it- and yes, that includes spouses. No one is entitled to ownership of another person's body.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

Correct lol. Except for PP talking to herself, reinforcing her own views.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

Me again - I have a theory (just dawned on me). Hard core feminism of the kind in this thread relies on diminishing men to the point where they are less than a person. That, then, gives them the right to reject and feel they should be exonerated as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

I'll get attacked. Guaranteed.

I really want to know why any woman feels that her feelings and needs are more important than her husbands. Vaginas don't give you special privileges. You don't get to reject people because you have one.

Anonymous wrote:So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

I predict crickets on this one, but what the hell do I know.

So what you feminists are saying is that you can decide you don't want to have sex with your husbands, but when your husbands then look for sex elsewhere, be it an affair or an escort, you don't understand why he would do that?

I'm curious to know why you feel it's ok not to engage in sexual relations with a man you are married to and not expect any repercussions. I'm not talking about physical limitations, just "I don't wanna". What makes women so special (and before you start in I AM a woman) that they feel they can behave like this?

Anonymous wrote:Guys are paying for sex if it is directly with cash or indirectly with emotions and time.

Ladies are kidding themselves if they think there is no male escort market. Every major city has a solid market for male escorts.

First of all, if you see emotions as being of no value other than as a means to an end of obtaining sex, then 1) you're doing it wrong and 2) how sad and unhealthy.

And secondly, there's actually no real market for gigolos for females. For gay men, on the other hand...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As my friend (a frequent visitor to prositutes) always said: you don't pay them for sex, you pay for them not to call you the next day.

Well it sure sounds better than "you pay them because no one else will have sex with you".

truer words were never spoken!! This is the real reason and we all know it!

It's ultimately economics, supply vs. demand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I completely do not understand men paying for sex. It seems so amazingly pathetic to have to hand money to a woman who has sex for a living and is clearly faking every moment - how could you even get it up?

I totally agree. This is why there is no real market for females seeking escorts. We have too much empathy and intelligence to be turned on when someone is clearly not into it/possibly even distressed.

Honestly it's shit like the prevalence of prostitution that genuinely makes me feel like becoming a lesbian would be a good plan. It's just so sickening to me that a good percentage of the male population engages in/tries to justify this.

This is not why there is no market for females seeking escorts. It's because women can rather easily have sex. And I doubt that most males who are hired to have sex with women would be in distress. That's not the way our society works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just know that you are scum.

I just watched a Nightline report on sexual trafficking. These poor women lead lives of horror and powerlessness can only experience in nightmares.

To anyone who has contributed to that, I hope you burn in hell.

I'm curious what you've done productively to combat trafficking, OP. Besides, you know, taking to a mommy board to lecture men?

Really? Isn't it enough for pp to not contribute money to the problem? Does she have to become the Sally Strothers of human trafficking in order to have credibility with whoremongers?

Anonymous wrote:Just know that you are scum.

I just watched a Nightline report on sexual trafficking. These poor women lead lives of horror and powerlessness can only experience in nightmares.

To anyone who has contributed to that, I hope you burn in hell.

I'm curious what you've done productively to combat trafficking, OP. Besides, you know, taking to a mommy board to lecture men?