Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Source for figures?
Personal friends of mine.
Amga and MGMA numbers are much closer to reality, yet still underreport physician pay.
You can google for those surveys from years past, current editions are at least $1000 last I checked.
Why do doctors whine about pay if these numbers are correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Source for figures?
Personal friends of mine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Source for figures?
Personal friends of mine.
Amga and MGMA numbers are much closer to reality, yet still underreport physician pay.
You can google for those surveys from years past, current editions are at least $1000 last I checked.
Why do doctors whine about pay if these numbers are correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Source for figures?
Personal friends of mine.
Amga and MGMA numbers are much closer to reality, yet still underreport physician pay.
You can google for those surveys from years past, current editions are at least $1000 last I checked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
How about salary.com http://www1.salary.com/Anesthesiologist-Salary.html which has the median at about 350k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Source for figures?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Nice. The practice of medicine is not about health care but about "RVU generation"--just another way of saying "induced demand." Ah, the moral underpinnings of so many of today's MDs--just warms the cockles of the heart.
Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Anonymous wrote:No rat - bls stats are so far off.
It's all about payor mix and rvu generation.
Think surgical sub specialty.
Don't you guys know that spine surgeons make 7 figs, as well as neurosurgeons?
Busy orthopedic docs make. 7 figs. GI docs.
660k is a high base for anesthesia - his group must be ripe for takeover by a huge corporation. All anestbesia groups pulling that in DC have already been bought, so you must be outside of DC.
Anonymous wrote:Physician, 5th year out of fellowship.
620k.
Started around 500k when I got out.
Unsure of future.
Anonymous wrote:Physician, 5th year out of fellowship.
620k.
Started around 500k when I got out.
Unsure of future.