Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's odd to me is how complacent parents who should know better can be. One of the most engaging threads on DCUM in the last few months was the one asking "Are We All Kidding Ourselves in DC?" Absent was the usual tiresome boosting.
Come on, well-meaning admins who can hardly speak any Chinese running a Mandarin immersion school? Chinese-speaking students welcome in name only? This is really the best YY can ever do? It can't be.
Yu Ying welcomes all students regardless of heritage and background if they are lucky to get in through the lottery. Many of us think this is good thing... and if it results in some Chinese-speaking kids not getting in, so be it.
Anonymous wrote:What's odd to me is how complacent parents who should know better can be. One of the most engaging threads on DCUM in the last few months was the one asking "Are We All Kidding Ourselves in DC?" Absent was the usual tiresome boosting.
Come on, well-meaning admins who can hardly speak any Chinese running a Mandarin immersion school? Chinese-speaking students welcome in name only? This is really the best YY can ever do? It can't be.
Anonymous wrote:What's odd to me is how complacent parents who should know better can be. One of the most engaging threads on DCUM in the last few months was the one asking "Are We All Kidding Ourselves in DC?" Absent was the usual tiresome boosting.
Come on, well-meaning admins who can hardly speak any Chinese running a Mandarin immersion school? Chinese-speaking students welcome in name only? This is really the best YY can ever do? It can't be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about these threads is that while some may be raising concerns truly because they just care about the quality of DC education, it's so incredibly obvious that those who commit time over and over again to slamming these specific aspects of a school like Yu Ying are doing so because they have something to prove, some personal "wrong" that they are trying to "right".
Because sane, level-headed people who truly don't have a dog in the fight understand the difference between arguing about best practice and what is preferable, and how that can be achieved under the current rules, or they talk about how to change the rules. They do not return to the same complaints thread after thread after thread and keep trying to "will into reality" rules or priorities that are either not available or not preferable to those most directly affected (the staff and families at the school).
It's not apples or organges; it's pure sour grapes. And it is so odd.
What it comes down to is that some Chinese people want an edge in admissions since the language taught is Mandarin. They feel it's an entitlement.
Anonymous wrote:What's odd to me is how complacent parents who should know better can be. One of the most engaging threads on DCUM in the last few months was the one asking "Are We All Kidding Ourselves in DC?" Absent was the usual tiresome boosting.
Come on, well-meaning admins who can hardly speak any Chinese running a Mandarin immersion school? Chinese-speaking students welcome in name only? This is really the best YY can ever do? It can't be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You do not seem to understand the DC charter school system at all.
The problem is that I do understand it, all too well. I'm on the board of directors of a DC charter, resigning shortly because I'm not on board with their policy of celebrating Apartheid education (the franchise is happy supporting and creating schools that aren't diverse).
One-way immersion is too far from best practices for me to cheer about it, or claim that it's the best we can or should do in this city outside of Oyster. You cheer if that works for you, but I can't see how your kids will accrue the benefit. Why let MoCo and NoVa walk away with the local academic edge as far as the eye can see?
Are those MoCo and NoVa schools you reference Charter Schools? If not, they are not relevant. Like NoVa and MoCo, DCPS allows dual lotteries for their immersion schools.
I wish they weren't relevant. Kids learn immersion Chinese in those suburban schools and, one day, they will be taking the very same AP, SAT II and IB Diploma Chinese language exams as DCI Mandarin-track students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about these threads is that while some may be raising concerns truly because they just care about the quality of DC education, it's so incredibly obvious that those who commit time over and over again to slamming these specific aspects of a school like Yu Ying are doing so because they have something to prove, some personal "wrong" that they are trying to "right".
Because sane, level-headed people who truly don't have a dog in the fight understand the difference between arguing about best practice and what is preferable, and how that can be achieved under the current rules, or they talk about how to change the rules. They do not return to the same complaints thread after thread after thread and keep trying to "will into reality" rules or priorities that are either not available or not preferable to those most directly affected (the staff and families at the school).
It's not apples or organges; it's pure sour grapes. And it is so odd.
What it comes down to is that some Chinese people want an edge in admissions since the language taught is Mandarin. They feel it's an entitlement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You do not seem to understand the DC charter school system at all.
The problem is that I do understand it, all too well. I'm on the board of directors of a DC charter, resigning shortly because I'm not on board with their policy of celebrating Apartheid education (the franchise is happy supporting and creating schools that aren't diverse).
One-way immersion is too far from best practices for me to cheer about it, or claim that it's the best we can or should do in this city outside of Oyster. You cheer if that works for you, but I can't see how your kids will accrue the benefit. Why let MoCo and NoVa walk away with the local academic edge as far as the eye can see?
Are those MoCo and NoVa schools you reference Charter Schools? If not, they are not relevant. Like NoVa and MoCo, DCPS allows dual lotteries for their immersion schools.
Anonymous wrote:What's so interesting about these threads is that while some may be raising concerns truly because they just care about the quality of DC education, it's so incredibly obvious that those who commit time over and over again to slamming these specific aspects of a school like Yu Ying are doing so because they have something to prove, some personal "wrong" that they are trying to "right".
Because sane, level-headed people who truly don't have a dog in the fight understand the difference between arguing about best practice and what is preferable, and how that can be achieved under the current rules, or they talk about how to change the rules. They do not return to the same complaints thread after thread after thread and keep trying to "will into reality" rules or priorities that are either not available or not preferable to those most directly affected (the staff and families at the school).
It's not apples or organges; it's pure sour grapes. And it is so odd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You do not seem to understand the DC charter school system at all.
The problem is that I do understand it, all too well. I'm on the board of directors of a DC charter, resigning shortly because I'm not on board with their policy of celebrating Apartheid education (the franchise is happy supporting and creating schools that aren't diverse).
One-way immersion is too far from best practices for me to cheer about it, or claim that it's the best we can or should do in this city outside of Oyster. You cheer if that works for you, but I can't see how your kids will accrue the benefit. Why let MoCo and NoVa walk away with the local academic edge as far as the eye can see?