Anonymous wrote:CLS costs about 2x as much as the other aftercare program at Murch -- what are they charging at Lafayette?
Anonymous wrote:CLS costs about 2x as much as the other aftercare program at Murch -- what are they charging at Lafayette?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the new provider CLS the Capital Language Services that currently operates out of St. Pauls and serves 50-100 Murch kids? No way are they equipped to run a 300 kid program especially with no oversight.
Yes, same provider. Who provides oversight at Murch?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the new provider CLS the Capital Language Services that currently operates out of St. Pauls and serves 50-100 Murch kids? No way are they equipped to run a 300 kid program especially with no oversight.
Yes, same provider. Who provides oversight at Murch?
Anonymous wrote:Is the new provider CLS the Capital Language Services that currently operates out of St. Pauls and serves 50-100 Murch kids? No way are they equipped to run a 300 kid program especially with no oversight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And I wouldn't want the existing LAP program to govern a contract on behalf of the school.
Agreed! Lack of oversight, and their last-minute punt to another company when they realized that Dr B was actually really serious about serving more students and families - it's really a shame, but definitely for the best. Even if it costs the families who have historically been part of the program more for aftercare then they're used to paying. It's a LOT less for families who've had to hire sitters/nannies/do other creative things.
Anonymous wrote:It generally is: assuming it's for an extended period of time and enforceable.
I guess use could be at her ongoing discretion but that would open the provider to a ton of risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. B just said that there's no contract at all, not with her, dcps, lap, or anyone else. That seems odd.
Why would anyone submit a proposal if there was no contract on the other end? Does she mean there is no contract YET?
No, that there won't be a contract. I guess there will be individual contracts between CLS and each individual family, but no contract with anyone representing the school.
Of course there would be for the individual aftercare services. There would presumably need to be a separate formal agreement with the school to secure the space.
Yes, a building use agreement. But that's not the same thing as a contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. B just said that there's no contract at all, not with her, dcps, lap, or anyone else. That seems odd.
Why would anyone submit a proposal if there was no contract on the other end? Does she mean there is no contract YET?
No, that there won't be a contract. I guess there will be individual contracts between CLS and each individual family, but no contract with anyone representing the school.
Of course there would be for the individual aftercare services. There would presumably need to be a separate formal agreement with the school to secure the space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. B just said that there's no contract at all, not with her, dcps, lap, or anyone else. That seems odd.
Why would anyone submit a proposal if there was no contract on the other end? Does she mean there is no contract YET?
No, that there won't be a contract. I guess there will be individual contracts between CLS and each individual family, but no contract with anyone representing the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. B just said that there's no contract at all, not with her, dcps, lap, or anyone else. That seems odd.
Why would anyone submit a proposal if there was no contract on the other end? Does she mean there is no contract YET?
No, that there won't be a contract. I guess there will be individual contracts between CLS and each individual family, but no contract with anyone representing the school.